Determination of High‐Temperature Float Charge Failure Mechanisms in Lithium‐Ion Batteries by Quantifying Active Lithium Loss DOI Creative Commons

Ya‐Lu Han,

Hao Wang,

Huifang Di

et al.

Carbon Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 22, 2025

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) suffer from float charge failure in the grid‐scale storage market. However, lack of a unified descriptor for diverse reasons behind poses challenge. Here, quantitative analysis active lithium loss is conducted across multiple temperatures into Li(Ni 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 )O 2 –graphite batteries. It proposed that can be used as to describe quantitatively. Approximately 6.88% and 0.96% are lost due solid electrolyte interphase thickening deposition, which primary secondary reasons, respectively. These findings confirmed by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiling, scanning electron microscope, accelerating rate calorimeter. Titration‐gas chromatography nuclear magnetic resonance utilized quantitatively analyze loss. Additionally, decomposition at high also contributes loss, determined Auger spectrum nondestructive ultrasound measurements. Notably, no detected cathode relatively low working voltage charge. suggest inhibiting an efficient way delaying during high‐temperature processes LIBs.

Language: Английский

Fabrication of Na0.67Li0.05Ni0.28Mn0.67O2 Cathode with Synergistic Engineering of Li-Doping and Mn-Precursor for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries DOI
Xiongfeng Lin, Junjun Zhang, Daxian Cao

et al.

Energy & Fuels, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 29, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Towards High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Comprehensive Review on NaxNiyFezMn1−(y+z)O2 Cathode Materials DOI Creative Commons

Alibi Namazbay,

Maksat Karlykan,

Lunara Rakhymbay

et al.

Energy storage materials, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 104212 - 104212

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Bridging Structure and Performance: Decoding Sodium Storage in Hard Carbon Anodes DOI
Laiqiang Xu, Yu Li,

Yinger Xiang

et al.

ACS Nano, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 9, 2025

Amorphous carbon, particularly hard carbon (HC), is widely considered as the most promising anode material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) due to its high reversible capacity and cost-effectiveness. However, complex poorly defined structural properties of HC present challenges in understanding underlying sodium storage mechanisms. To facilitate rational design high-performance anodes, a comprehensive correlation between microstructure behavior critical. This Review critically examines interplay features capabilities, focusing on two key factors: pore structure surface functional groups. It begins by outlining fundamental mechanisms HC, followed an in-depth discussion how chemistry influence storage. Finally, strategic insights are provided manipulate these factors optimize performance. aims drive development next-generation anodes support commercialization SIBs.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Insights and Applications of Electrochemical Techniques and Devices in Rechargeable Batteries DOI
Tian Chen, Yu Li,

Yuteng Gong

et al.

ACS Applied Energy Materials, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 10, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Determination of High‐Temperature Float Charge Failure Mechanisms in Lithium‐Ion Batteries by Quantifying Active Lithium Loss DOI Creative Commons

Ya‐Lu Han,

Hao Wang,

Huifang Di

et al.

Carbon Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 22, 2025

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) suffer from float charge failure in the grid‐scale storage market. However, lack of a unified descriptor for diverse reasons behind poses challenge. Here, quantitative analysis active lithium loss is conducted across multiple temperatures into Li(Ni 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 )O 2 –graphite batteries. It proposed that can be used as to describe quantitatively. Approximately 6.88% and 0.96% are lost due solid electrolyte interphase thickening deposition, which primary secondary reasons, respectively. These findings confirmed by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiling, scanning electron microscope, accelerating rate calorimeter. Titration‐gas chromatography nuclear magnetic resonance utilized quantitatively analyze loss. Additionally, decomposition at high also contributes loss, determined Auger spectrum nondestructive ultrasound measurements. Notably, no detected cathode relatively low working voltage charge. suggest inhibiting an efficient way delaying during high‐temperature processes LIBs.

Language: Английский

Citations

0