Ecological Modelling,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
496, P. 110844 - 110844
Published: Aug. 29, 2024
Agricultural
intensification
is
widely
recognised
as
a
primary
driver
of
pollinator
loss,
but
the
success
land-management
actions
designed
to
remediate
its
impact
often
mixed.
Payments
farmers
increase
habitat
connectivity
or
availability
floral
and
nesting
resources
may
only
result
in
short-term
gains
even
unintended
consequences.
The
reasons
lie
changes
interaction
networks
competition
intensity
that
remain
poorly
understood.
Models
pollination
service
typically
implicitly
assume
population
dynamics
are
regulated
by
nest-site
availability,
though
empirical
evidence
suggests
occupancy
likely
at
least
part
dependent
on
resource
availability.
To
investigate
consequences
for
coarse-grained
agricultural
landscapes
we
extended
an
established
model
bees
combining
optimal
foraging
dynamics,
include
new
functions
depletion
realistic
colony
dynamics.
We
find
intra-specific
occurs
late
season
forcing
forage
underutilised
sites
situated
further
towards
their
range
limits.
A
lower
rate
energy
acquisition
ultimately
limits
size
peak
delays
timing.
Consequently,
can
limit
distribution
while
same
time
contributing
more
stable
efficacious
service.
Although
was
not
found
be
important
establishment
success,
effect
hunger
gap
early
indirectly
influences
later
leading
complex
outcomes.
Agricultural
intensification
is
widely
recognised
as
a
primary
driver
of
pollinator
loss,
but
the
success
land-management
actions
designed
to
remediate
its
impact
often
mixed.
Payments
farmers
increase
habitat
connectivity
or
availability
floral
and
nesting
resources
may
only
result
in
short-term
gains
even
unintended
consequences.
The
reasons
lie
changes
interaction
networks
competition
intensity
that
remain
poorly
understood.
Models
pollination
service
typically
implicitly
assume
population
dynamics
are
regulated
by
nest-site
availability,
though
empirical
evidence
suggests
occupancy
likely
at
least
part
dependent
on
resource
availability.
To
investigate
consequences
for
coarse-grained
agricultural
landscapes
we
extended
an
established
model
bees
combining
optimal
foraging
dynamics,
include
new
functions
depletion
realistic
colony
dynamics.
We
find
intra-specific
occurs
late
season
forcing
forage
underutilised
sites
situated
further
towards
their
range
limits.
A
lower
rate
energy
acquisition
ultimately
limits
size
peak
delays
timing.
Consequently,
can
limit
distribution
while
same
time
contributing
more
stable
efficacious
service.
Although
was
not
found
be
important
establishment
success,
effect
hunger
gap
early
indirectly
influences
later
leading
complex
outcomes.
Ecological Modelling,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
496, P. 110844 - 110844
Published: Aug. 29, 2024
Agricultural
intensification
is
widely
recognised
as
a
primary
driver
of
pollinator
loss,
but
the
success
land-management
actions
designed
to
remediate
its
impact
often
mixed.
Payments
farmers
increase
habitat
connectivity
or
availability
floral
and
nesting
resources
may
only
result
in
short-term
gains
even
unintended
consequences.
The
reasons
lie
changes
interaction
networks
competition
intensity
that
remain
poorly
understood.
Models
pollination
service
typically
implicitly
assume
population
dynamics
are
regulated
by
nest-site
availability,
though
empirical
evidence
suggests
occupancy
likely
at
least
part
dependent
on
resource
availability.
To
investigate
consequences
for
coarse-grained
agricultural
landscapes
we
extended
an
established
model
bees
combining
optimal
foraging
dynamics,
include
new
functions
depletion
realistic
colony
dynamics.
We
find
intra-specific
occurs
late
season
forcing
forage
underutilised
sites
situated
further
towards
their
range
limits.
A
lower
rate
energy
acquisition
ultimately
limits
size
peak
delays
timing.
Consequently,
can
limit
distribution
while
same
time
contributing
more
stable
efficacious
service.
Although
was
not
found
be
important
establishment
success,
effect
hunger
gap
early
indirectly
influences
later
leading
complex
outcomes.