Diagnosis,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 326 - 327
Published: Feb. 17, 2023
Diagnosis
2023;
aop
collected
from
the
left
and
right
naris
(22.2
vs.
22.7,
p=0.346).To
this
end,
results
of
our
study
confirm
that
collection
a
nasopharyngeal
swab
single
nostril
may
be
reliable
less
invasive
alternative
for
diagnosing
SARS-CoV-2
infection
than
collecting
standard
double-nostril
NOS,
thus
contributing
to
reduce
discomfort
potentially
enhance
testing
compliance.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
61(2), P. 323 - 331
Published: Oct. 25, 2022
The
rapid,
accurate
and
safe
detection
of
SARS-CoV-2
is
the
key
to
improving
surveillance
infection
containment.
aim
present
study
was
ascertain
whether,
after
heat/chemical
inactivation,
N
antigen
chemiluminescence
(CLEIA)
assay
in
saliva
remains
a
valid
alternative
molecular
testing.In
2022,
139
COVID-19
inpatients
467
healthcare
workers
were
enrolled.
In
606
self-collected
samples
(Salivette),
detected
by
(TaqPath
rRT-PCR)
chemiluminescent
Ag
assays
(Lumipulse
G).
effect
sample
pre-treatment
(extraction
solution-ES
or
heating)
on
recovery
verified.Salivary
highly
(AUC=0.959,
95%
CI:
0.943-0.974),
with
90%
sensitivity
92%
specificity.
Of
254
positive
samples,
29
false
positives.
We
demonstrated
that
heterophilic
antibodies
could
be
cause
results.
A
significant
concentration
decrease
observed
ES
treatment
(p=0.0026),
misclassification
43
samples.
Heat
had
minimal
impact,
correct
classification
cases
maintained.CLEIA
salivary
provides
accurate,
timely
high-throughput
results
remain
also
heat
thus
ensuring
safer
work
environment.
This
supports
use
CLEIA
programs.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
61(9), P. 1661 - 1669
Published: March 22, 2023
Abstract
Objectives
Laboratory
testing
for
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
has
played
an
important
role
in
the
effort
to
prevent
and
contain
local
outbreaks.
The
aim
of
this
study
was
assess
diagnostic
accuracy
a
new
fully
automated
SARS-CoV-2
laboratory-based
antigen
assay
(CoV2Ag)
explore
efficiency
algorithm
combining
conventional
high-throughput
molecular
assays
address
potential
future
challenges
pandemic.
Methods
One
thousand
two
hundred
twenty
four
consecutive
nasopharyngeal
swabs
were
tested
using
RT-PCR
CoV2Ag
assay.
Results
overall
sensitivity
specificity
79.1
97.8%,
respectively.
When
analysis
restricted
cases
with
Ct
values
≤30,
improved
98.1%.
Acceptable
found
when
limited
patients
presenting
within
one
or
days
symptom
onset
(80.5
84.8%,
respectively).
A
retrospective
use
two-step
approach
during
pandemic
phase
97
showed
reduction
number
tests
by
36.1%,
corresponding
savings
reagent
costs
technician
workload
approximately
€8,000
10.5
h
per
day,
Conclusions
Our
data
show
that
proposed
represents
valid
alternative
increase
phases
high
positivity
rates
(>20%)
elevated
numbers
test
requests.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 29, 2023
Abstract
Background
.
This
article
presents
a
critical
literature
review
and
meta-analysis
of
diagnostic
performance
Quidel
Sofia
SARS
antigen
Fluorescent
Immunoassay
(FIA),
rapid
test
(RDT-Ag)
adapted
for
automatic
reading
with
portable
instruments,
thus
potentially
combining
the
advantages
point-of-care
testing
those
laboratory-based
immunoassay.
Methods:
We
conduced
an
electronic
search
in
PubMed
Scopus
keywords
"Quidel"
OR
“SOFIA”
AND
“Antigen”
"SARS-CoV-2"
“COVID-19”
up
to
March
24,
2023,
identifying
articles
containing
data
on
accuracy
FIA
diagnosing
acute
SARS-CoV-2
infections.
selected
where
was
compared
that
reference
molecular
assay,
sufficient
information
constructing
2×2
table.
Results:
A
total
number
18
(48165
samples;
9.8%
positive
at
testing)
were
included
this
meta-analysis,
averaging
24
sample
cohorts.
The
(summary
area
under
curve),
sensitivity
specificity
0.980,
0.76
1.00
all
samples,
0.981,
0.81
0.99
samples
collected
from
symptomatic
patients,
0.931,
0.55
taken
asymptomatic
0.960,
0.77
mixed
cohorts
respectively.
Minor
clinically
negligible
differences
could
be
found
by
comparing
results
nasal
nasopharyngeal
swabs.
Conclusion:
Ag
meets
minimum
criteria
antigenic
testing,
satisfactory
being
used
as
device.
Diagnosis,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(2), P. 187 - 192
Published: Jan. 20, 2023
Since
the
external
validation
of
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
antigen
rapid
diagnostic
tests
(SARS-CoV-2
RDT-Ags)
is
a
necessary
requisite
before
they
can
be
introduced
into
routine
clinical
practice,
this
study
reports
results
real-world
assessment
performance
new
COVID-VIRO
ALL
IN
device.The
population
consisted
in
165
outpatients
(median
age:
43
years,
range:
14-68
years;
66.1%
females)
who
had
paired
nasal
and
nasopharyngeal
samples
collected
upon
hospital
presentation.
The
were
concomitantly
tested
with
AAZ-LMB
SARS-CoV-2
RDT-Ag
Cepheid
Xpert
Xpress
real-time
reverse
transcription
polymerase
chain
reaction
(RT-PCR).The
number
subjects
positive
RT-PCR
(i.e.,
mean
Ct
value
<45)
was
116
(70.3%),
109
(66.1%)
86
(52.1%)
values
<37
<30,
respectively.
In
all
samples,
displayed
78.8%
agreement,
0.698
sensitivity,
1.000
specificity,
0.583
negative
predictive
(NPV)
(PPV)
compared
to
RT-PCR.
median
testing
significantly
lower
than
those
(22.8
vs.
32.2;
p<0.001).
high
viral
load
<30),
92.1%
0.895
0.949
0.983
NPV
0.951
PPV
RT-PCR.Although
do
not
exactly
match
manufacturer,
its
would
enable
fast-track
identification
highly
contagious
subjects.
Diagnosis,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 326 - 327
Published: Feb. 17, 2023
Diagnosis
2023;
aop
collected
from
the
left
and
right
naris
(22.2
vs.
22.7,
p=0.346).To
this
end,
results
of
our
study
confirm
that
collection
a
nasopharyngeal
swab
single
nostril
may
be
reliable
less
invasive
alternative
for
diagnosing
SARS-CoV-2
infection
than
collecting
standard
double-nostril
NOS,
thus
contributing
to
reduce
discomfort
potentially
enhance
testing
compliance.