The Lancet Regional Health - Europe,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
6, С. 100102 - 100102
Опубликована: Апрель 29, 2021
Little
is
known
to
date
about
the
impact
of
COVID-19
pandemic
on
self-harm.The
number
hospitalizations
for
self-harm
(ICD-10
codes
X60-X84)
in
France
from
1st
January
31st
August
2020
(including
a
two-month
confinement)
was
compared
same
periods
2017-2019.
Statistical
methods
comprised
Poisson
regression,
Cox
regression
and
Student's
t-test,
plus
Spearman's
correlation
test
relating
spatial
analysis
hospitalizations.There
were
53,583
during
2020.
Compared
period
2019,
this
represents
an
overall
8·5%
decrease
(Relative
Risk
[95%
Confidence
Interval]
=
0·91
[0·90-0·93]).This
started
first
week
confinement
persisted
until
end
August.
Similarly,
found
both
women
(RR=0·90
[0·88-0·92])
men
(RR=0·94
[0·91-0·95]),
all
age
groups,
except
65
years
older.
Regarding
by
means
category,
increases
firearm
(RR=1·20
[1·03-1·40])
jumping
heights
(RR=1·10
[1·01-1·21]).
There
trend
more
intensive
care
(RR=1·03
[0·99-1·07]).
The
deaths
at
discharge
hospital
also
increased
(Hazard
Ratio
1·19
[1·09-1·31]).
Self-harm
weakly
correlated
with
rates
hospitalization
across
administrative
departments
(Spearman's
rho
=-0·21;
p
0·03),
but
not
hospitalizations.The
had
varied
effects
early
months
France.
Active
suicide
prevention
strategies
should
be
maintained.French
National
Research
Agency.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
17(4), С. 915 - 936
Опубликована: Янв. 19, 2022
COVID-19
has
infected
millions
of
people
and
upended
the
lives
most
humans
on
planet.
Researchers
from
across
psychological
sciences
have
sought
to
document
investigate
impact
in
myriad
ways,
causing
an
explosion
research
that
is
broad
scope,
varied
methods,
challenging
consolidate.
Because
policy
practice
aimed
at
helping
live
healthier
happier
requires
insight
robust
patterns
evidence,
this
article
provides
a
rapid
thorough
summary
high-quality
studies
available
through
early
2021
examining
mental-health
consequences
living
pandemic.
Our
review
evidence
indicates
anxiety,
depression,
distress
increased
months
Meanwhile,
suicide
rates,
life
satisfaction,
loneliness
remained
largely
stable
throughout
first
year
In
response
these
insights,
we
present
seven
recommendations
(one
urgent,
two
short-term,
four
ongoing)
support
mental
health
during
pandemic
beyond.
European Neuropsychopharmacology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
55, С. 22 - 83
Опубликована: Окт. 29, 2021
The
global
public
health
crisis
caused
by
COVID-19
has
lasted
longer
than
many
of
us
would
have
hoped
and
expected.
With
its
high
uncertainty
limited
control,
the
pandemic
undoubtedly
asked
a
lot
from
all
us.
One
important
central
question
is:
how
resilient
we
proved
in
face
unprecedented
prolonged
coronavirus
pandemic?
There
is
vast
rapidly
growing
literature
that
examined
impact
on
mental
both
shorter
(2020)
(2021)
term.
This
not
only
concerns
pandemic-related
effects
resilience
general
population,
but
also
challenged
stress
outcomes
across
more
specific
vulnerable
population
groups:
patients
with
psychiatric
disorder,
diagnosed
patients,
care
workers,
children
adolescents,
pregnant
women,
elderly
people.
It
challenging
to
keep
up
date
with,
interpret,
this
increasing
scientific
literature.
In
review,
provide
critical
overview
impacted
human
been
shaped
dominated
wealth
data
which
are,
however,
always
highest
quality
heavily
depend
online
self-report
surveys.
Nevertheless,
it
appears
proven
surprisingly
over
time,
fast
recovery
measures.
Still,
groups
such
as
adolescents
personnel
severely
do
exist.
Large
interindividual
differences
exist,
for
future
pandemics
there
clear
need
comprehensively
integratively
assess
start
personalized
help
interventions
tailored
needs
groups.
Elevated
rates
of
mental
health
concerns
have
been
identified
during
the
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
In
this
study,
we
sought
to
evaluate
whether
youth
reported
a
greater
frequency
suicide-related
behaviors
2020
COVID-19
pandemic
as
compared
with
2019.
We
hypothesized
that
would
be
elevated
between
months
March
and
July
2019,
corresponding
onset
pandemic.Routine
suicide-risk
screening
was
completed
aged
11
21
in
pediatric
emergency
department.
Electronic
records
data
for
screens
January
were
evaluated.
A
total
9092
examined
(mean
age
14.72
years,
47.7%
Hispanic
and/or
Latinx,
26.7%
non-Hispanic
white,
18.7%
Black).Rates
positive
screen
results
from
Results
indicated
significantly
higher
rate
suicide
ideation
attempts
February,
March,
April,
same
2019.Rates
some
but
not
universally
across
period.
Months
appear
correspond
times
when
COVID-19-related
stressors
community
responses
heightened,
indicating
experienced
distress
these
periods.
Healthcare,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
9(2), С. 222 - 222
Опубликована: Фев. 17, 2021
Mental
health
issues
among
college
students
is
a
leading
public
concern,
which
seems
to
have
been
exacerbating
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
While
previous
estimates
related
psychological
burden
are
available,
quantitative
synthesis
of
available
data
still
needs
be
performed.
Therefore,
this
meta-analysis
endeavors
present
collective
evidence
discussing
impact
students.
Bibliographical
library
databases,
including
Embase,
Medline,
CINAHL,
Scopus,
and
PsycINFO,
were
systematically
searched
for
relevant
studies.
Titles,
abstracts,
full
articles
screened,
two
reviewers
extracted
data.
Heterogeneity
was
assessed
by
I2
statistic.
The
random-effects
model
utilized
obtain
pooled
indicators
Location,
gender,
level
severity,
quality
scores
used
as
moderator
variables
subgroup
analyses.
Funnel
plot
Egger
linear
regression
test
assess
publication
bias.
Twenty-seven
studies
constituting
90,879
met
inclusion
criteria.
results
indicated
39.4%
anxiety
(95%
CI:
28.6,
51.3;
=
99.8%;
p-value
<
0.0001)
31.2%
depression
19.7,
45.6;
I2=
99.8%,
p
prevalence
stress
(26.0%),
post-traumatic
disorder
(29.8%),
impaired
sleep
(50.5%)
also
reported.
College
bear
disproportionate
mental
problems
worldwide,
with
females
having
higher
levels
than
males.
This
study‘’s
findings
underscore
need
develop
appropriate
interventions
address
students’
emotional
psychosocial
needs.
policies
should
reflective
demographic
socioeconomic
differentials.
Journal of Affective Disorders,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
321, С. 167 - 181
Опубликована: Окт. 28, 2022
This
meta-analysis
and
systematic
review
aimed
to
evaluate
the
global
prevalence
risk
factors
of
mental
problems
(i.e.,
depression,
anxiety,
stress,
sleep
disorder,
posttraumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD),
burnout,
psychological
distress,
suicidal
ideation)
among
medical
students
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
We
searched
PubMed,
Embase,
Web
Science,
psycARTICLES,
PsycINFO,
CNKI,
Wan
Fang
for
studies
on
from
January
1,
2020,
April
2022.
The
pooled
was
calculated
by
random-effect
models.
performed
a
narrative
identify
factors.
included
201
(N
=
198,000).
depression
(41
%,
95
%
CI,
37–45
%,),
anxiety
(38
%,95
34
%–42
%),
(34
27
(52
44
%–60
distress
(58
51
%–65
PTSD
22
%–46
ideation
(15
11
%–18
%)
burnout
25
%–50
high.
major
were
being
female,
junior
or
preclinical
students,
exposure
COVID-19,
academic
psychiatric
physical
disorders
history,
economic
trouble,
fear
education
impairment,
online
learning
infection,
loneliness,
low
activity,
social
support,
problematic
internet
smartphone
use,
young
age.
Most
cross-sectional.
Few
provided
reasonable
response
rate,
suggesting
potential
selection
bias.
study
demonstrated
high
calling
health
services.
Our
findings
are
valuable
college
authorities
high-risk
provide
targeted
intervention.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
18(4), С. 1836 - 1836
Опубликована: Фев. 13, 2021
The
COVID-19
virus
has
become
a
fearful
epidemic
for
people
all
over
the
world.
In
Turkey,
long
quarantine
periods
and
curfews
have
increased
both
physical
psychological
problems.
Due
to
rapid
spread
substantial
impact
of
virus,
different
effects
were
observed
among
segments
society,
such
as
young
people,
elderly
active
workers.
Because
fear
caused
by
it
is
thought
that
depression,
stress,
anxiety
levels
increased.
It
estimated
there
are
more
issues
with
poor
health
others
whose
friends
or
family
became
ill
died
because
COVID-19.
To
explore
test
situation
mentioned
above,
we
conducted
cross-sectional
study
in
Turkey
3287
participants
above
16
years
old.
We
measured
fear,
along
anxiety,
depression
(DASS21)
demographics.
Firstly,
tested
whether
predicts
depression.
Secondly,
investigated
if
effect
stronger
those
who
underlying
illness
results
showed
women
16–25
old
youths
higher
COVID-19-related
stress.
Furthermore,
found
significant
relationship
between
well
moderation
having
an
infected
died.
These
show
importance
implementing
specific
implementations,
particularly
vulnerable
groups,
minimize
problems
may
arise
pandemic.