Emerging Radiotherapy Technologies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Challenges and Opportunities in the Era of Immunotherapy DOI Open Access
Carmen Kut, Harry Quon, Xuguang Chen

и другие.

Cancers, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 16(24), С. 4150 - 4150

Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024

Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral component in the multidisciplinary management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Significant advances have been made toward optimizing tumor control toxicity profiles RT for HNSCC past two decades. The development intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrent chemotherapy established standard care most locally advanced around turn century. More recently, selective dose escalation to radioresistant part avoidance critical substructures organs at risk, often guided by functional imaging, allowed even further improvement therapeutic ratio IMRT. Other highly conformal modalities, including proton therapy (IMPT) stereotactic body (SBRT) are being increasingly utilized, although there gaps our understanding normal tissue complication probabilities their relative biological effectiveness. There renewed interest spatially fractionated (SFRT), such as GRID LATTICE radiotherapy, both palliative definitive settings. emergence immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized treatment recurrent metastatic HNSCC. Novel IMPT, SBRT, SFRT, potential reduce lymphopenia suppression, stimulate anti-tumor immunity, synergize ICIs. next frontier may lie exploration combined modality new technologies

Язык: Английский

Assessing proton plans with three different beam delivery systems versus photon plans for head and neck tumors DOI Creative Commons
T. Gray,

Chieh‐Wen Liu,

Saeed Ahmed

и другие.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Фев. 17, 2025

Abstract Purpose To compare plan quality among photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity‐modulated proton (IMPT) with robustness using three different beam delivery systems various spot size (σ) ranges: cyclotron‐generated beams (CPBs) (σ: 2.7–7.0 mm), linear accelerator (LPBs) 2.9–5.5 mini (LPMBs) 0.8–3.9 mm) for the treatment of head neck (HN) cancer bilateral irradiation. Methods Ten patients treated oropharynx irradiation were planned CPBs, LPBs, LPMBs, VMAT. The homogeneity index (HI), mean body dose, defined doses selected critical organs‐at‐risk (OARs) compared. Set‐up uncertainties ±3 mm ± 3.5% range included in robust evaluation V 95%Rx > 95% (Volume that covers target volume at prescription (Rx) dose) to high dose low CTV volumes (CTV_70 Gy CTV_56 Gy). VMAT plans compared terms OAR only. Homogeneity Indices IMPT addition doses. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used evaluate statistical differences between metrics all types. Results improved by 2% 30% from CPB LPB or LPMB plans. Compared plans, except mandible 53% also 7.5% 10.8% LPMB. In addition, 44% CPB, 48% LPB, 50% HI significantly better ( p < 0.05) considerably For both CTV_70 Gy, average across worst‐case scenarios slightly an 97.6% 1.22%, followed 97.2% 1.31% 1.35% respectively. Robustness showed comparable types, 97.4% 0.87% 1.21%, 97.5% 1.08% Conclusion With decreased size, are excellent alternatives can reduce normal tissue.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Comparing the oncologic outcomes of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma DOI
Chia‐Lun Chang, Kuan‐Chou Lin, Wan‐Ming Chen

и другие.

Radiotherapy and Oncology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 190, С. 109971 - 109971

Опубликована: Окт. 30, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

10

An Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography Maximum Standard Uptake Value Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Photon and Proton Radiation DOI
Irini Youssef, Nader Mohamed,

Daniel Kallini

и другие.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 120(5), С. 1326 - 1331

Опубликована: Март 16, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

Comparison of 3-year local control using DAHANCA radiotherapy guidelines before and after implementation of five millimetres geometrical GTV to high-dose CTV margin DOI
Ruta Zukauskaite, Morten Horsholt Kristensen, Jesper Grau Eriksen

и другие.

Radiotherapy and Oncology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 196, С. 110284 - 110284

Опубликована: Апрель 16, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

Osteoradionecrosis Rates Following Head and Neck Radiotherapy: Beyond the Numbers DOI
Fan Yang, Richard J. Wong, Kaveh Zakeri

и другие.

Practical Radiation Oncology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(4), С. e264 - e275

Опубликована: Апрель 21, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

The Potential and Challenges of Proton FLASH in Head and Neck Cancer Reirradiation DOI Open Access

Chingyun Cheng,

Liming Xu,

Hao Jing

и другие.

Cancers, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 16(19), С. 3249 - 3249

Опубликована: Сен. 24, 2024

Ultrahigh-dose-rate therapy, also known as FLASH radiotherapy (RT), is an emerging technique that garnering significant interest in cancer treatment due to its potential revolutionize therapy. This method can achieve comparable tumor control conventional-dose-rate RT while offering the enhanced protection of normal tissue through FLASH-sparing effect. innovative has demonstrated promising results preclinical studies involving animals and cell lines. Particularly noteworthy application treating head neck (HN) cancers, especially patients with challenging recurrent tumors reirradiation cases, where toxicity rates conventional are high. Such applications aim enhance minimizing side effects preserving patients’ quality life. In comparison electron or photon modalities, proton therapy superior dosimetric delivery characteristics a safe effective for human malignancies. Compared transmission FLASH, single-energy Bragg peak novel allows highly conformal doses targets minimal radiation crucial OARs. Proton HN still not been well studied. review highlights significance enhancing by examining advantages challenges using it reirradiation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

Impact of Relative Biologic Effectiveness for Proton Therapy for Head and Neck and Skull-Base Tumors: A Technical and Clinical Review DOI Open Access
Adam L. Holtzman, Homan Mohammadi, Keith M. Furutani

и другие.

Cancers, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 16(11), С. 1947 - 1947

Опубликована: Май 21, 2024

Proton therapy has emerged as a crucial tool in the treatment of head and neck skull-base cancers, offering advantages over photon terms decreasing integral dose reducing acute late toxicities, such dysgeusia, feeding tube dependence, xerostomia, secondary malignancies, neurocognitive dysfunction. Despite its benefits distribution biological effectiveness, application proton is challenged by uncertainties relative effectiveness (RBE). Overcoming challenges related to RBE key fully realizing therapy's potential, which extends beyond physical dosimetric properties when compared with photon-based therapies. In this paper, we discuss clinical significance within volumes adjacent serial organs at risk management tumors. We review modeling explore outcomes. Additionally, highlight technological advancements innovations plan optimization delivery, including linear energy transfer/RBE optimizations development spot-scanning arc therapy. These show promise harnessing full capabilities from an academic standpoint, further outcome studies, however, are needed for their integration into routine practice.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

A systematic review and meta-analysis of osteoradionecrosis following proton therapy in patients with head and neck cancer DOI
Kun-Wei Chiu, Tzu‐Ping Yu, Yung‐Shuo Kao

и другие.

Oral Oncology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 148, С. 106649 - 106649

Опубликована: Ноя. 29, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Toxicity with proton therapy for oral and/or oropharyngeal cancers: A scoping review DOI Creative Commons
Sneha Sethi,

Mitchel O'Neil,

Emilija D. Jensen

и другие.

Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 52(7), С. 567 - 574

Опубликована: Март 5, 2023

Abstract Background Oral and/or oropharyngeal cancers account for approximately 2% of all malignancies, with variation across age groups, genders, and geographic locations. Treatments oral usually consist a combination surgical excision most commonly followed by radiotherapy ± chemotherapy immunotherapy/biotherapy depending on the nature malignancy. The significant morbidity caused high‐dose to head neck region is widely observed. Proton therapy promising treatment option that localises proton beam direct radiation at specific target, reduced irradiation adjacent structures. Method objective was explore toxicity associated adults cancer. Eligibility criteria included full‐text articles, English published between up till 7 January 2023. Databases PubMed, Scopus, Web Science, Embase, Scopus. Results systematic search identified 345 studies total 18 were after two independent reviewers completed title, abstract, screening. Included from four countries, median participant range 53.3 66 years. reported acute toxic effects dysphagia, dermatitis, mucositis, dysgeusia, alopecia. Conclusion an evolving cancer technique has diverse advantages over conventional chemotherapy. This review provides evidence supports improved profile compared treat individuals.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

Hadrontherapy in the context of cancer care in Italy DOI
Marco Krengli, Stefano Pergolizzi, C. Iotti

и другие.

Health and Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(5), С. 841 - 845

Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1