Characteristics of KRAS gene mutations in real clinical practice for pancreatic cancer DOI Creative Commons
Mariam Sh. Manukian, I. Bazin, А. А. Tryakin

и другие.

Surgery and Oncology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(1), С. 28 - 35

Опубликована: Март 20, 2025

Background . Pancreatic cancer (PC) has long been a disease with limited treatment options, where the foundation of therapy was primarily based on cytostatics. However, advent first KRAS G12C inhibitors, new prospects have emerged for advanced PC, highlighting importance studying mutations, which occur in 80–95 % cases. In this context, it is relevant to analyze frequency various mutations among Russian population patients could help personalize further diagnostics and therapy. Aim. To study features status younger older than 65 years pancreatic adenocarcinoma real clinical practice. Materials methods. We retrospectively analyzed data 590 who underwent molecular genetic research at N. Blokhin from 2022 2024. Patients primary multiple malignancies were excluded study. Inclusion criteria presence histological verification diagnosis known KRAS, NRAS, BRCA 1/2, CHEK2, PALB2, ATM status. divided into two age groups, years. The endpoint comparative assessment mutation rate both groups. Results. 129 included analysis. detection wild-type general 24.8 %. most common groups p.G12V p.G12D , accounting 79.2 all gene. p.G12C detected (2 %). Five clinically significant 1/2 genes identified; patient mBRCA1 had wild type remaining 4 BRCA2 also mutation. Conclusion. Given increasing number drugs that affect ability detect other alterations wtKRAS integration testing routine practice evaluation necessary.

Язык: Английский

Mutant KRAS and GATA6 Stratify Survival in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study DOI Open Access
Jung Won Chun, Dong-eun Lee, Nayoung Han

и другие.

Cancers, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 17(5), С. 896 - 896

Опубликована: Март 5, 2025

Several pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) biomarkers beyond the traditional carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 have been identified but are lacking large-scale prospective validation. This cohort study evaluated prognostic impact of potential PA biomarkers. We enrolled 238 288 patients with histologically proven PA. assessed candidate biomarkers, including CA19-9, germline BRCA1/2, and ATM mutations, as well mutant KRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood samples. Additionally, we expression SLC29A1 (hENT1), DCK, CES2, GATA6. examined association progression-free survival (PFS) overall (OS). analyzed biomarker efficacy 200 (median age 65 years; 55% male) who received chemotherapy. A high ctDNA concentration (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.508 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.052-2.161 for PFS; HR: 1.796 CI: 1.203-2.681 OS) CA19-9 level (HR: 1.647 1.177-2.306 1.803 1.248-2.605 were associated poor prognosis. High GATA6 RNA was linked to longer PFS 0.336 0.195-0.582) OS 0.304 0.165-0.560). Plasma concentrations could serve significant PA, potentially guiding therapeutic decisions prognostication.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Characteristics of KRAS gene mutations in real clinical practice for pancreatic cancer DOI Creative Commons
Mariam Sh. Manukian, I. Bazin, А. А. Tryakin

и другие.

Surgery and Oncology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(1), С. 28 - 35

Опубликована: Март 20, 2025

Background . Pancreatic cancer (PC) has long been a disease with limited treatment options, where the foundation of therapy was primarily based on cytostatics. However, advent first KRAS G12C inhibitors, new prospects have emerged for advanced PC, highlighting importance studying mutations, which occur in 80–95 % cases. In this context, it is relevant to analyze frequency various mutations among Russian population patients could help personalize further diagnostics and therapy. Aim. To study features status younger older than 65 years pancreatic adenocarcinoma real clinical practice. Materials methods. We retrospectively analyzed data 590 who underwent molecular genetic research at N. Blokhin from 2022 2024. Patients primary multiple malignancies were excluded study. Inclusion criteria presence histological verification diagnosis known KRAS, NRAS, BRCA 1/2, CHEK2, PALB2, ATM status. divided into two age groups, years. The endpoint comparative assessment mutation rate both groups. Results. 129 included analysis. detection wild-type general 24.8 %. most common groups p.G12V p.G12D , accounting 79.2 all gene. p.G12C detected (2 %). Five clinically significant 1/2 genes identified; patient mBRCA1 had wild type remaining 4 BRCA2 also mutation. Conclusion. Given increasing number drugs that affect ability detect other alterations wtKRAS integration testing routine practice evaluation necessary.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0