Few
coastal
ecosystems
remain
untouched
by
direct
human
activities,
and
none
are
unimpacted
anthropogenic
climate
change.
These
drivers
interact
with
exacerbate
each
other
in
complex
ways,
yielding
a
mosaic
of
ecological
consequences
that
range
from
adaptive
responses,
such
as
geographic
shifts
changes
phenology,
to
severe
impacts,
mass
mortalities,
regime
loss
biodiversity.
Identifying
the
role
change
these
phenomena
requires
corroborating
evidence
multiple
lines
evidence,
including
laboratory
experiments,
field
observations,
numerical
models
palaeorecords.
Yet
few
studies
can
confidently
quantify
magnitude
effect
attributable
solely
change,
because
seldom
acts
alone
ecosystems.
Projections
future
risk
further
complicated
scenario
uncertainty
–
is,
our
lack
knowledge
about
degree
which
humanity
will
mitigate
greenhouse-gas
emissions,
or
make
ways
we
impact
Irrespective,
ocean
warming
would
be
impossible
reverse
before
end
century,
sea
levels
likely
continue
rise
for
centuries
elevated
millennia.
Therefore,
risks
projected
mirror
impacts
already
observed,
severity
escalating
cumulative
emissions.
Promising
avenues
progress
beyond
qualitative
assessments
include
collaborative
modelling
initiatives,
model
intercomparison
projects,
use
broader
systems.
But
reduce
rapidly
reducing
emissions
greenhouse
gases,
restoring
damaged
habitats,
regulating
non-climate
stressors
using
climate-smart
conservation
actions,
implementing
inclusive
coastal-zone
management
approaches,
especially
those
involving
nature-based
solutions.
Conservation Biology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Сен. 13, 2024
Abstract
Plans
for
expanding
protected
area
systems
(prioritizations)
need
to
fulfill
conservation
objectives.
They
also
account
other
factors,
such
as
economic
feasibility
and
anthropogenic
land‐use
requirements.
Although
prioritizations
are
often
generated
with
decision
support
tools,
most
tools
have
limitations
that
hinder
their
use
decision‐making.
We
outlined
how
the
prioritizr
R
package
(
https://prioritizr.net
)
can
be
used
systematic
prioritization.
This
tool
provides
a
flexible
interface
build
planning
problems.
It
leverage
variety
of
commercial
(e.g.,
Gurobi)
open‐source
CBC
SYMPHONY)
exact
algorithm
solvers
identify
optimal
solutions
in
short
period.
is
compatible
spatially
explicit
ESRI
Shapefile,
GeoTIFF)
nonspatial
tabular
Microsoft
Excel
Spreadsheet)
data
formats.
Additionally,
it
functionality
evaluating
prioritizations,
assessing
relative
importance
different
places
selected
by
To
showcase
package,
we
applied
case
study
based
Washington
state
(United
States)
which
developed
prioritization
improve
coverage
native
avifauna.
accounted
land
acquisition
costs,
existing
areas,
might
not
suitable
establishment,
spatial
fragmentation.
conducted
benchmark
analysis
examine
performance
solvers.
The
identified
12,400
km
2
priority
areas
increasing
percentage
species’
distributions
covered
areas.
open
source
were
able
quickly
solve
large‐scale
problems,
required
complex,
problems..
available
on
Comprehensive
Archive
Network
(CRAN).
In
addition
reserve
selection,
inform
habitat
restoration,
connectivity
enhancement,
ecosystem
service
provisioning.
has
been
numerous
exercises
best
practices
aid
real‐world
Integrative Conservation,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
2(3), С. 140 - 155
Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2023
Abstract
As
part
of
the
Kunming‐Montreal
Global
Biodiversity
Framework
(K‐M
GBF),
signatory
nations
Convention
on
Biological
Diversity
(CBD)
aim
to
protect
at
least
30%
planet
by
2030
(Target
3).
This
bold
ambition
has
been
widely
celebrated
and
its
implementation
seen
as
pivotal
for
overall
success
K‐M
GBF.
However,
given
that
many
CBD
prioritised
quantity
(e.g.,
area)
over
quality
important
areas
biodiversity)
when
attempting
meet
their
2010
Aichi
protected
area
commitments,
it
is
critical
focus
protecting
those
terrestrial,
inland
waters
marine
have
best
chance
halting
reversing
biodiversity
loss
thus
contribute
Goal
A
Here
we
provide
a
review
type
need
prioritise
implementing
Target
3
relates
‘quality’:
particular
importance
ecosystem
functions
services,
are
effectively
conserved
managed
through
ecologically
representative,
well‐connected
equitably
governed
systems
.
We
show
data
available
12
distinct
conservation
service
elements
can
be
mapped
and,
if
conserved,
will
(with
appropriate
management)
help
broad
intention
3.
highlight
examples
planning
methods
utilized
so
these
targeted
protection.
discuss
issues
related
trade‐offs
regarding
how
amongst
them
well
operationalise
some
vaguer
concepts
like
‘representation’
‘ecosystem
services’
they
achieve
outcomes
biodiversity.
Cambridge Prisms Coastal Futures,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
1
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2023
Abstract
Few
coastal
ecosystems
remain
untouched
by
direct
human
activities,
and
none
are
unimpacted
anthropogenic
climate
change.
These
drivers
interact
with
exacerbate
each
other
in
complex
ways,
yielding
a
mosaic
of
ecological
consequences
that
range
from
adaptive
responses,
such
as
geographic
shifts
changes
phenology,
to
severe
impacts,
mass
mortalities,
regime
loss
biodiversity.
Identifying
the
role
change
these
phenomena
requires
corroborating
evidence
multiple
lines
evidence,
including
laboratory
experiments,
field
observations,
numerical
models
palaeorecords.
Yet
few
studies
can
confidently
quantify
magnitude
effect
attributable
solely
change,
because
seldom
acts
alone
ecosystems.
Projections
future
risk
further
complicated
scenario
uncertainty
–
is,
our
lack
knowledge
about
degree
which
humanity
will
mitigate
greenhouse-gas
emissions,
or
make
ways
we
impact
Irrespective,
ocean
warming
would
be
impossible
reverse
before
end
century,
sea
levels
likely
continue
rise
for
centuries
elevated
millennia.
Therefore,
risks
projected
mirror
impacts
already
observed,
severity
escalating
cumulative
emissions.
Promising
avenues
progress
beyond
qualitative
assessments
include
collaborative
modelling
initiatives,
model
intercomparison
projects,
use
broader
systems.
But
reduce
rapidly
reducing
emissions
greenhouse
gases,
restoring
damaged
habitats,
regulating
non-climate
stressors
using
climate-smart
conservation
actions,
implementing
inclusive
coastal-zone
management
approaches,
especially
those
involving
nature-based
solutions.
Marine
protected
area
(MPAs)
networks
can
buffer
marine
ecosystems
from
the
impacts
of
climate
change
by
allowing
species
to
redistribute
as
conditions
and
reducing
other
stressors.
There
are,
however,
few
examples
where
has
been
considered
in
MPA
network
design.
In
this
paper,
we
assess
how
considerations
were
integrated
into
design
a
newly
released
Northern
Shelf
Bioregion
British
Columbia,
Canada,
then
evaluate
resulting
against
projected
physical
biogeochemical
changes
biological
responses.
We
found
that
representation,
replication,
size
spacing
recommendations
phase
met
most
cases.
Furthermore,
despite
varying
degrees
temperature,
dissolved
oxygen,
aragonite
saturation
across
network,
suitable
habitat
for
demersal
fish
is
remain
some
redistribution
among
sites.
also
mid-depth
MPAs
are
particularly
important
persistence,
move
deeper
avoid
warming
shallower
areas.
Our
results
highlight
representative
with
adequate
incorporates
areas
trajectory,
should
change.
Abstract
Climate
change
is
a
multidimensional
phenomenon.
As
such,
no
single
metric
can
capture
all
trajectories
of
and
associated
impacts.
While
numerous
metrics
exist
to
measure
climate
change,
they
tend
focus
on
central
tendencies
neglect
the
multidimensionality
extreme
weather
events
(EWEs).
EWEs
differ
in
their
frequency,
duration,
intensity,
be
described
for
temperature,
precipitation,
wind
speed,
while
considering
different
thresholds
defining
“extremeness.”
We
review
existing
EWE
outline
framework
classifying
interpreting
them
light
foreseeable
impacts
biodiversity.
Using
an
example
drawn
from
Caribbean
Central
America,
we
show
that
reflect
unequal
spatial
patterns
exposure
across
region.
Based
available
evidence,
discuss
how
such
relate
threats
biological
populations,
empirically
demonstrating
ecologically
informed
help
processes
as
mangrove
recovery.
Unveiling
complexity
affecting
biodiversity
only
possible
through
mobilisation
plethora
metrics.
The
proposed
represents
step
forward
over
assessments
using
dimensions
or
averages
highly
variable
time
series.
Research Square (Research Square),
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 20, 2025
Abstract
Climate
change
and
anthropogenic
activities
threaten
biodiversity
ecosystem
services.
Climate-smart
conservation
plans
address
these
challenges
by
focusing
protection
in
climate-resilient
areas.
However,
integrating
climate
the
design
of
is
often
deemed
too
expensive,
as
it
may
require
larger
networks
or
protecting
more
costly
sites.
Using
mangroves
a
case
study,
we
evaluated
efficiency
climate-smart
versus
climate-naïve
reserve
networks.
We
found
that
could
provide
sizable
benefits
for
relatively
small
increases
protected
area.
Moreover,
transboundary
plans,
involving
cooperation
among
countries,
less
area
protect
than
nation-by-nation
plans.
Implementing
strategies
would
improve
current
network
areas
mangroves,
which
currently
has
poor
resilience.
These
findings
also
be
applied
other
ecosystems.