Insects,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
9(4), С. 186 - 186
Опубликована: Дек. 6, 2018
By
2030,
ten
percent
of
earth’s
landmass
will
be
occupied
by
cities.
Urban
environments
can
home
to
many
plants
and
animals,
but
surveying
estimating
biodiversity
in
these
spaces
is
complicated
a
heterogeneous
built
environment
where
access
landscaping
are
highly
variable
due
human
activity.
Citizen
science
approaches
may
the
best
way
assess
urban
biodiversity,
little
known
about
their
relative
effectiveness
efficiency.
Here,
we
compare
three
techniques
for
acquiring
data
on
butterfly
(Lepidoptera:
Rhopalocera)
species
richness:
trained
volunteer
Pollard
walks,
Malaise
trapping
with
expert
identification,
crowd-sourced
iNaturalist
observations.
A
total
30
were
observed;
27
(90%)
recorded
walk
observers,
18
(60%)
found
traps,
22
(73%)
reported
observers.
walks
highest
richness,
followed
then
traps
during
four-month
time
period.
also
had
significantly
higher
diversity
than
traps.
Applied Geography,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
153, С. 102916 - 102916
Опубликована: Фев. 24, 2023
Understanding
the
observation
process
is
key
to
effective
use
of
opportunistic
biodiversity
data
from
low-structure
citizen
science.
We
investigated
how
observer
characteristics,
including
activity
level
(enthusiastic,
moderate,
or
short-term)
and
primary
location
(resident
visitor),
influenced
spatial
taxonomic
patterns
iNaturalist
participation
in
Hawaiian
Islands
2008
2021.
found
that
visitors
represented
nearly
two-thirds
all
observers
96%
enthusiastic
group.
Sampling
bias
toward
developed
areas,
sites
near
roads
trails,
areas
with
fewer
protections
was
relatively
stronger
for
residents,
most
whom
were
short-term
participants.
However,
observations
by
residents
had
greatest
diversity.
Participation
grew
exponentially
through
2019,
then
decreased
spring
2020.
Though
resident
comparatively
steady
during
COVID-19
travel
restrictions,
it
did
not
compensate
decline
visitor
activity.
Once
restrictions
ended
2021,
recovered
quickly
among
but
continued
be
lower
than
expected
residents.
Our
results
indicate
majority
diversity
sampling
relies
on
a
small
group
highly
active
observers,
are
unlikely
live
region.
Fostering
sustained,
local
could
improve
consistency
quality
thus
their
utility
conservation.
Urban Ecosystems,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
27(6), С. 2179 - 2189
Опубликована: Июль 22, 2024
Abstract
Urban
areas
are
growing
rapidly
across
the
globe.
Such
environments
present
specific
challenges
to
wildlife.
Resources
can
be
highly
fragmented
in
space
and
time,
accompanied
by
risks
opportunities
that
emerge
from
proximity
with
humans.
Overall,
these
have
been
shown
lead
activity
patterns
wildlife,
which
tend
restrict
their
use
accordingly
avoid
encounters
Yet,
some
foraging
supplied
humans
also
attract
Urban-dwelling
species
would
therefore
benefit
learning
when
where
exploit
human
derived
food.
Here,
we
investigate
how
birds
of
different
degrees
urbanization
if
they
do
so
time
patterns.
We
used
example
feeding
sulphur-crested
cockatoos
(
Cacatua
galerita
)
Sydney,
Australia.
combined
tracking
identify
key
resources,
a
citizen
science
approach
human-wildlife
interactions
urban
landscape.
Our
data
suggest
SCC
not
all
parts
home
range
equally,
but
green
spaces
as
roosting
areas,
while
facultatively
using
more
urbanized
at
times
most
rewarding.
This
implies
role
for
sophisticated
place
learning,
matching
study
builds
on
literature
investigating
human-animal
interactions,
expanding
our
understanding
animals’
exploitation
behavior.
results
highlight
unique
opportunity
studies
wildlife
biodiversity
establishment,
maintenance,
cognitive
ecology.
Insects,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
9(4), С. 186 - 186
Опубликована: Дек. 6, 2018
By
2030,
ten
percent
of
earth’s
landmass
will
be
occupied
by
cities.
Urban
environments
can
home
to
many
plants
and
animals,
but
surveying
estimating
biodiversity
in
these
spaces
is
complicated
a
heterogeneous
built
environment
where
access
landscaping
are
highly
variable
due
human
activity.
Citizen
science
approaches
may
the
best
way
assess
urban
biodiversity,
little
known
about
their
relative
effectiveness
efficiency.
Here,
we
compare
three
techniques
for
acquiring
data
on
butterfly
(Lepidoptera:
Rhopalocera)
species
richness:
trained
volunteer
Pollard
walks,
Malaise
trapping
with
expert
identification,
crowd-sourced
iNaturalist
observations.
A
total
30
were
observed;
27
(90%)
recorded
walk
observers,
18
(60%)
found
traps,
22
(73%)
reported
observers.
walks
highest
richness,
followed
then
traps
during
four-month
time
period.
also
had
significantly
higher
diversity
than
traps.