Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
34(9)
Опубликована: Авг. 30, 2024
ABSTRACT
The
use
of
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
as
a
tool
for
monitoring
represents
major
innovative
advance
in
science,
one
that
enables
the
detection
species
without
need
to
observe
or
capture
them.
This
article
assesses
state
play
eDNA
research
targeting
crayfish.
We
found
total
41
peer‐reviewed
articles
published
between
2014
and
2023
on
both
native
invasive
species.
Most
studies
focused
(or
native/invasive
co‐detection
assessment)
(65.8%).
There
was
also
clear
geographical
bias
across
studies,
with
more
than
half
conducted
Europe
(51.2%)
quarter
United
States
(26.8%).
In
contrast,
there
were
none
Africa.
relatively
large
number
has
led
an
interesting
diversity
protocols
designed
utilized,
most
favouring
development
their
own
assays
(69.33%).
That
said,
filtration
(as
method)
common
(80.5%),
along
commercially
available
extraction
kits
(69.8%).
COI
gene
appeared
be
preferred
target
region
(89.33%).
Such
range
is
interesting,
but
it
optimal?
Are
best
always
being
utilized?
Or
chance
novel
application
hampering
our
ability
explore
larger
trends
studies?
ABSTRACT
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
sampling
is
a
powerful
method
for
detecting
aquatic
species
at
low
densities.
However,
eDNA
may
remain
close
to
the
source
in
lentic
systems,
decreasing
effectiveness
of
surveys.
We
conducted
cage
experiments
with
salamanders
and
simultaneous
detailed
hydrologic
wind
measurements
investigate
influence
physical
environment
on
detection
patterns
ponds.
found
much
higher
rates
surface
layer
than
depth,
that
vegetation
reduced
produced
open
water
by
80%–94%.
Within
mixed
layer,
were
highest
direction
flow
bottom
half
detections
farthest
from
occurred
when
velocities
this
sublayer
high.
Detections
near
zero
even
was
flowing
fast
away
point.
The
lower
negatively
correlated
most
study.
These
spatial
temporal
dynamics
indicate
transport
processes
ponds
are
highly
complex.
Sampling
vegetation,
upwind
potential
sources,
addition
many
locations
within
pond
considering
patterns,
improve
rare
species.
This
work
contributes
growing
body
literature
characterizing
variability
systems.
Journal of Wildlife Management,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
87(7)
Опубликована: Июль 5, 2023
Abstract
Environmental
DNA
analysis
of
water
samples
has
recently
emerged
as
a
powerful
tool
for
studying
the
distribution,
ecology,
and
conservation
many
amphibian
species.
Validating
efficacy
through
comparison
with
established
methods
detection
is
important
any
new
method.
We
used
multi‐method
single‐method
occupancy
models
to
explore
effectiveness
3
techniques
detecting
northern
leopard
frogs
(
Lithobates
pipiens
)
boreal
chorus
Pseudacris
maculata
).
conducted
surveys
using
automated
recording
units,
environmental
sampling,
visual
encounter
in
spring
(30
Apr–3
Jun)
summer
(23
Jul–27
Aug)
2014
at
68
sites
southern
Alberta,
Canada.
The
incorporated
data
from
all
survey
while
accounting
lack
independence
detections
within
sampling
occasion,
we
compared
this
analyses
biases
associated
each
method
differences
method‐specific
probability.
Occupancy
probabilities
estimated
were
biased
frogs,
overestimating
probability
underestimating
occupancy.
could
not
assess
bias
because
overdispersion
present
models.
Although
no
single
covariate
explained
bias,
it
was
ameliorated
(albeit
by
reducing
precision)
including
raw
count
individuals
proxy
abundance
during
breeding
but
post‐metamorphic
season.
These
results
emphasize
need
careful
consideration
temporal
spatial
aspects
design,
conducting
pilot
studies,
external
validation
eDNA‐only
monitoring
schemes
prior
widespread
implementation.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
33(12), С. 1401 - 1412
Опубликована: Окт. 30, 2023
Abstract
Wildlife
surveys
are
central
to
the
conservation
and
restoration
management
of
wetland
habitats;
however,
often
laborious
costly
nature
traditional
survey
methods
can
constrain
spatial
temporal
extent
replication
efforts.
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
technologies
now
provide
opportunity
reduce
some
these
limitations,
but
applications
in
temporary
permanent
freshwater
marshes
meadows
(herein
referred
as
‘wetland
habitats’)
remain
limited.
This
study
investigates
performance
single‐time‐point
eDNA
for
characterizing
fish,
amphibian
bird
assemblages
habitats
south‐eastern
Australia.
Comparisons
were
made
between
coastal
inland
wetlands,
wetlands
varying
condition
surveys.
Findings
show
that
comprehensive
descriptions
faunal
associated
with
habitats,
resolution
similar
provided
by
approaches.
Analyses
also
revealed
significant
differences
patterns
biodiversity
types
(coastal
vs.
inland)
not
condition.
Overall,
this
confirms
a
reliable
option
undertaking
assessments
aimed
at
improving
data
coverage
otherwise
deficient
wetlands.
Abstract
Moor
frogs
(
Rana
arvalis
)
are
protected
by
the
European
Union's
Habitats
Directive,
often
making
them
a
target
for
environmental
impact
assessments.
However,
moor
frog
detection
with
traditional
method
using
their
mating
calls
is
difficult,
time‐consuming,
and
limited
to
short
season.
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)‐based
methods
could
be
beneficial
in
since
shy
co‐occurring
common
R.
temporaria
morphologically
similar.
Additionally,
eDNA‐based
even
extend
period
of
frogs.
We
tested
two
different
isolation
eDNA
methods,
Sanger
sequencing
quantitative
PCR
(qPCR),
compared
results
call
survey
method.
In
addition,
we
whether
linear
polyacrylamide
treatment
would
improve
detection.
sampled
27
sites
Finland,
which
were
detected
17
acoustic
method,
20
sequencing‐based
21
qPCR‐based
water
bodies
during
3–4
weeks
after
end
Our
show
that
both
(Sanger
qPCR)
can
used
detect
at
least
weeks,
but
qPCR
slightly
outperforms
sequencing.
Linear
did
not
results.
Detection
probabilities
similar
or
higher
than
as
also
heard.
Based
on
our
results,
highly
monitoring
presence
complement
surveys.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
34(9)
Опубликована: Авг. 30, 2024
ABSTRACT
The
use
of
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
as
a
tool
for
monitoring
represents
major
innovative
advance
in
science,
one
that
enables
the
detection
species
without
need
to
observe
or
capture
them.
This
article
assesses
state
play
eDNA
research
targeting
crayfish.
We
found
total
41
peer‐reviewed
articles
published
between
2014
and
2023
on
both
native
invasive
species.
Most
studies
focused
(or
native/invasive
co‐detection
assessment)
(65.8%).
There
was
also
clear
geographical
bias
across
studies,
with
more
than
half
conducted
Europe
(51.2%)
quarter
United
States
(26.8%).
In
contrast,
there
were
none
Africa.
relatively
large
number
has
led
an
interesting
diversity
protocols
designed
utilized,
most
favouring
development
their
own
assays
(69.33%).
That
said,
filtration
(as
method)
common
(80.5%),
along
commercially
available
extraction
kits
(69.8%).
COI
gene
appeared
be
preferred
target
region
(89.33%).
Such
range
is
interesting,
but
it
optimal?
Are
best
always
being
utilized?
Or
chance
novel
application
hampering
our
ability
explore
larger
trends
studies?