Environmental Science & Technology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
58(4), С. 1877 - 1881
Опубликована: Янв. 21, 2024
Environmental
risk
assessment
traditionally
relies
on
a
wide
range
of
in
vivo
testing
to
assess
the
potential
hazards
chemicals
environment.
These
tests
are
often
time-consuming
and
costly
can
cause
test
organisms'
suffering.
Recent
developments
reliable
low-cost
alternatives,
both
vivo-
silico-based,
opened
door
reconsider
current
toxicity
assessment.
However,
many
these
new
approach
methodologies
(NAMs)
rely
high-quality
annotated
genomes
for
surrogate
species
regulatory
Currently,
lack
genomic
information
slows
process
NAM
development.
Here,
we
present
phylogenetically
resolved
overview
missing
resources
within
ecotoxicological
We
call
an
organized
systematic
effort
(regulatory)
community
provide
resources.
Further,
discuss
standardized
landscape
enable
robust
nonanimal-reliant
systems
ecotoxicology
era.
Environmental Research,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
204, С. 112225 - 112225
Опубликована: Окт. 18, 2021
Globally,
regulatory
authorities
grapple
with
the
challenge
of
assessing
hazards
and
risks
to
human
ecosystem
health
that
may
result
from
exposure
chemicals
disrupt
normal
functioning
endocrine
systems.
Rapidly
increasing
number
in
commerce,
coupled
reliance
on
traditional,
costly
animal
experiments
for
hazard
characterization
-
often
limited
sensitivity
many
important
mechanisms
disruption
-,
presents
ongoing
challenges
chemical
regulation.
The
consequence
is
a
which
there
sufficient
data
assess
if
toxicity
hence
few
thorough
characterization.
To
address
this
challenge,
assessment
disrupting
(EDCs)
benefiting
revolution
toxicology
focuses
New
Approach
Methodologies
(NAMs)
more
rapidly
identify,
prioritize,
potential
using
novel,
efficient,
mechanistically
driven
methodologies
tools.
Incorporated
into
Integrated
Approaches
Testing
Assessment
(IATA)
guided
by
conceptual
frameworks
such
as
Adverse
Outcome
Pathways
(AOPs),
emerging
approaches
focus
initially
molecular
interactions
between
test
potentially
vulnerable
biological
systems
instead
need
data.
These
new
testing
methods
can
be
complemented
silico
computational
approaches,
including
those
predict
kinetics.
Coupled
data,
these
will
inform
risk-based
decision-making
approaches.
Canada
part
global
network
collaborating
building
confidence
use
NAMs
EDCs.
Herein,
we
review
current
EDC
regulation
globally
(mainly
perspective
health),
provide
how
advances
applied
discuss
promises
faced
adopting
novel
minimize
due
Canada,
our
world.
Environment International,
Год журнала:
2019,
Номер
133, С. 105275 - 105275
Опубликована: Окт. 29, 2019
After
reviewing
the
species-
and
community-level
ecological
risk
assessments
(ERAs)
of
chemicals
in
aquatic
environment,
present
study
attempted
to
propose
a
third
stage
ERA,
i.e.,
ecosystem-level
ERA.
Based
on
species
sensitivity
distribution
model
(SSD)
thermodynamic
theory,
exergy
biomass
indicators
communities
from
various
trophic
levels
(TLs)
were
introduced
improve
connotation
SSDs.
The
classified
into
three
TLs
based
algae
(TL1),
invertebrates
(TL2),
vertebrates
(TL3),
weight
each
TL
was
determined
relative
β
value,
which
indicated
holistic
contribution
or
community
ecosystem.
Then,
system-level
ERA
protocol
successfully
established,
community-
risks
10
typical
toxic
micro-organic
pollutants
western
area
Lake
Chaohu
its
inflowing
rivers
evaluated.
System-level
curves
(ExSSD)
mainly
affected
by
SSD
at
TL2
for
most
study.
uncertain
boundary
ExSSD
mostly
related
with
wider
boundary,
but
had
little
relation
TL.
results
ERAs
revealed
that
dibutyl
phthalate
highest
eco-risk,
whereas
γ-hexachlorocyclohexane
presented
lowest
eco-risk.
Results
not
fully
consistent
those
owing
lack
sufficient
dataset,
type,
ecosystem
structure,
as
successful
application
signifies
start
system-level,
it
also
provides
scientific
basis
protection,
future
water
safety
management.
However,
there
some
limitations,
including
data
dependence,
neglect
interactions,
environmental
parameters
such
natural
organic
matter.
We
employ
toxicogenomics
enrich
toxicity
database,
simulate
interaction
using
dynamic
model,
introduce
chemical
fate
Environment International,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
169, С. 107458 - 107458
Опубликована: Авг. 6, 2022
Humans
are
potentially
exposed
to
a
large
amount
of
chemicals
present
in
the
environment
and
workplace.
In
European
Human
Biomonitoring
initiative
(Human
for
Union
=
HBM4EU),
acrylamide,
mycotoxins
(aflatoxin
B1,
deoxynivalenol,
fumonisin
B1),
diisocyanates
(4,4'-methylenediphenyl
diisocyanate,
2,4-
2,6-toluene
diisocyanate),
pyrethroids
were
included
among
prioritized
concern
human
health.
For
literature
review,
analytical
methods
used
worldwide
biomonitoring
studies
these
compounds
collected
presented
comprehensive
tables,
including
following
parameter:
determined
biomarker,
matrix,
sample
amount,
work-up
procedure,
available
laboratory
quality
assurance
assessment
information,
techniques,
limit
detection.
Based
on
data
most
suitable
recommended.
According
paradigm
biomonitoring,
information
about
two
different
biomarkers
exposure
was
evaluated:
a)
internal
dose
parent
metabolites
urine
blood;
b)
biologically
effective
measured
as
blood
protein
adducts.
Urine
preferred
matrix
(biomarkers
dose).
Markers
biological
hemoglobin
adducts
serum-albumin-adducts
aflatoxin
B1
diisocyanates.
The
analyses
quantitation
or
mostly
performed
with
LC-MS/MS
GC-MS
presence
isotope-labeled
standards.
This
review
also
addresses
critical
aspects
application,
use
selection
biomarkers.
future
studies,
more
approach
is
discussed
broaden
compounds.
Environmental Health Perspectives,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
128(10)
Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2020
Background:
Some
20
y
ago,
scientific
and
regulatory
communities
identified
the
potential
of
omics
sciences
(genomics,
transcriptomics,
proteomics,
metabolomics)
to
improve
chemical
risk
assessment
through
development
toxicogenomics.
Recognizing
that
regulators
adopt
new
methods
cautiously
given
accountability
diverse
stakeholders,
scope
pace
adoption
toxicogenomics
tools
data
have
nonetheless
not
met
ambitious,
early
expectations
proponents.
Objective:
Our
objective
was,
therefore,
inventory,
investigate,
derive
insights
into
drivers
obstacles
in
assessment.
By
invoking
established
social
science
frameworks
conceptualizing
innovation
adoption,
we
also
aimed
develop
recommendations
for
proponents
other
approach
methodologies
(NAMs).
Methods:
We
report
findings
from
an
analysis
56
publications
1998
2017
address
From
this
purposeful
sample
discourse,
major
categories
sets.
then
mapped
these
onto
generate
actionable
Discussion:
identify
most
salient
obstacles.
2017,
was
understood
be
helped
by
such
as
those
labeled
Superior
understanding,
New
applications,
Reduced
cost
&
increased
efficiency
but
hindered
Insufficient
validation,
Complexity
interpretation,
Lack
standardization.
Leveraging
frameworks,
find
arguments
draw
on
drivers,
which
emphasize
superior
novel
functionality
rationales,
overlook
adopters'
key
concerns:
simplicity
use
compatibility
with
existing
practices.
two
perspectives—innovation-centric
adopter-centric—on
explain
how
overreliance
former
may
undermining
efforts
promote
https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6500