A Comparative Science-Based Viability Assessment Among Current and Emerging Hydrogen Production Technologies DOI Creative Commons
Y.F. Khalil

Applied Sciences, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(2), С. 497 - 497

Опубликована: Янв. 7, 2025

This research undertakes a comparative analysis of current and emerging hydrogen (H2) production technologies, evaluating them based on quantitative qualitative decision criteria. The criteria include cost H2 (USD/kg H2), energy consumption (MJ/kg global warming potential (kg CO2-eq/kg technology efficiency (%). encompass readiness level (TRL) availability supply chain materials (classified as low, medium, or high). To achieve these objectives, an extensive literature review has been conducted, systematically assessing the selected technologies against aforementioned insights synthesized from provide foundation for informed, science-based evaluation potentials techno-economic challenges that face in achieving 1-1-1 goal set by U.S. Department Energy (DOE) 2021. target aims USD 1/kg within one decade (by 2031), including costs associated with production, delivery, dispensing at fueling stations (HRSs). Also, DOE established interim 2/kg 2026. concludes among examined water electrolysis biomass waste valorization emerge most promising near-term solutions to meet DOE’s goal.

Язык: Английский

Advancements in water electrolysis technologies and enhanced storage solutions for green hydrogen using renewable energy sources DOI

D. Christopher Selvam,

Yuvarajan Devarajan,

Thirumalaiswamy Raja

и другие.

Applied Energy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 390, С. 125849 - 125849

Опубликована: Апрель 6, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

A Comparative Science-Based Viability Assessment Among Current and Emerging Hydrogen Production Technologies DOI Creative Commons
Y.F. Khalil

Applied Sciences, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(2), С. 497 - 497

Опубликована: Янв. 7, 2025

This research undertakes a comparative analysis of current and emerging hydrogen (H2) production technologies, evaluating them based on quantitative qualitative decision criteria. The criteria include cost H2 (USD/kg H2), energy consumption (MJ/kg global warming potential (kg CO2-eq/kg technology efficiency (%). encompass readiness level (TRL) availability supply chain materials (classified as low, medium, or high). To achieve these objectives, an extensive literature review has been conducted, systematically assessing the selected technologies against aforementioned insights synthesized from provide foundation for informed, science-based evaluation potentials techno-economic challenges that face in achieving 1-1-1 goal set by U.S. Department Energy (DOE) 2021. target aims USD 1/kg within one decade (by 2031), including costs associated with production, delivery, dispensing at fueling stations (HRSs). Also, DOE established interim 2/kg 2026. concludes among examined water electrolysis biomass waste valorization emerge most promising near-term solutions to meet DOE’s goal.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0