A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Relithiation Techniques: Balancing Production Costs, Electrochemical Performance, and Environmental Impact DOI Creative Commons
Evgenii V. Beletskii, Alexey I. Volkov, Elizaveta Yu. Evschik

и другие.

Energy & environment materials, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 29, 2024

Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) has found many applications in the field of electric vehicles and energy storage systems. However, increasing volume end‐of‐life LFP batteries poses an urgent challenge terms environmental sustainability resource management. Therefore, development implementation efficient battery recycling methods are crucial to address these challenges. This article presents a novel, comprehensive evaluation framework for comparing different lithium relithiation techniques. The includes three main sets criteria: direct production cost, electrochemical performance, impact. Each criterion is scored on scale 0–100, with higher scores indicating better performance. cost rated based material costs, consumption, key equipment process duration space requirements. Electrochemical performance assessed by rate capability cycle stability. Environmental impact CO 2 emissions. provides standardized technique researchers industry professionals objectively compare methods, facilitating identification most promising approaches further scale‐up. total average score across groups electrochemical, chemical, hydrothermal was approximately 60 points, while sintering 39 making it least attractive technique. Combining outlined publications exceeding 60, scheme proposed achieve optimal minimal consumption results demonstrate framework's applicability highlight areas future research optimization cathode recycling.

Язык: Английский

Recycling of Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathodes: Challenges and Progress DOI
Hao Yao, Yuhui Zhang, Gaoliang Yang

и другие.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Сен. 16, 2024

The number of spent lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

7

Direct and Low‐Temperature Regeneration of Degraded LiFePO₄ Cathodes at Ambient Conditions Using Green and Sustainable Deep Eutectic Solvent DOI Creative Commons
Yi‐Xin Lin, Tiansheng Wang,

Chaochao Gao

и другие.

Advanced Science, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Май 20, 2025

Abstract The definite lifespan of lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 , LFP) batteries necessitates the advancement cost‐effective, nature‐friendly, and productive recycling techniques for spent LFP batteries. In this study, ethylene glycol (C 2 H 6 O ), a sustainable economical small organic molecule, is employed as multifunctional hydrogen‐bonding donor, along with chloride (LiCl), readily accessible Li source acceptor. Together, they form novel Li‐salt deep eutectic solvent (DES) through hydrogen bonding interactions. This DES directly repairs rejuvenates cathode material (S‐LFP) at 80 °C. not only replenishes depleted in S‐LFP reduces adverse effects Li–Fe antisite defects but also establishes reducing environment that facilitates reversion degraded Fe(III) species back to their original Fe(II) state. Consequently, regenerated exhibits remarkable electrochemical behavior, delivering an initial capacity 155.6 mAh g −1 0.1 C retaining 93% its after 300 cycles 1 C. approach can be scaled up treat large quantities recovered from fully retired batteries, presenting practical pathway toward large‐scale future.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Direct Recycling of Retired Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Emerging Methods for Sustainable Reuse DOI

Zhao-Yu Lai,

Jun Long, Yong Lü

и другие.

Advanced Energy Materials, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2025

Abstract Among various recycling lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) methods, direct consumes far less energy and fewer chemical agents. Most regeneration approaches become the specialized process of repairing individual materials due to different degraded levels spent materials. This review summarized solid‐state sintering, hydrothermal, eutectic salt, electrochemical, other emerging methods used for directly retired power batteries, with a particular focus on their universality when electrodes. Recent progress (LiFePO 4 , LiCoO 2 LiNi x Co y Mn z O ) are outlined, pretreatment removal impurities also summarized, emphasizing importance improving technical stability LIBs. A series challenges corresponding potential solutions proposed guiding development toward practical application. Developing technology that can adaptively replenish lithium (Li) resources in cathode might be an important target future. With recycling, economic, universal, advanced strategies will applied by fully understanding mechanism foreseeable

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Interfacial Metal‐Solvent Chelation for Direct Regeneration of LiFePO4 Cathode Black Mass DOI
Junfeng Li, Ruyu Shi, Junxiong Wang

и другие.

Advanced Materials, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 4, 2024

Abstract Direct regeneration of spent lithium‐ion batteries presents a promising approach to effectively reuse valuable resources and benefit the environment. Unlike controlled laboratory conditions that commonly facilitate impurity purification minimize structural damage, LiFePO 4 cathode black mass faces significant interfacial challenges, including structure deterioration, cathode‐electrolyte interphase residues, damage from storage procedures, which hinder lithium replenishment regeneration. Here, metal‐solvent chelation reaction using acetylacetonate solution is introduced address these challenges under ambient conditions. This method regulates near‐surface through strong between Acac ‒ anions Fe (III) elements, thus eliminating degraded amorphous phase residual fluorine compounds. By direct connection reducing diffusion barriers, reconstructed surface facilitates re‐lithiation process. The regenerated cathodes demonstrate capacity retention 88.5% after 400 cycles at 1 C, while also outperforming traditional recycling methods in terms environmental economic benefits. provides for regenerating actual dismantled mass, thereby accelerating practical application battery recycling.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Relithiation Techniques: Balancing Production Costs, Electrochemical Performance, and Environmental Impact DOI Creative Commons
Evgenii V. Beletskii, Alexey I. Volkov, Elizaveta Yu. Evschik

и другие.

Energy & environment materials, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 29, 2024

Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) has found many applications in the field of electric vehicles and energy storage systems. However, increasing volume end‐of‐life LFP batteries poses an urgent challenge terms environmental sustainability resource management. Therefore, development implementation efficient battery recycling methods are crucial to address these challenges. This article presents a novel, comprehensive evaluation framework for comparing different lithium relithiation techniques. The includes three main sets criteria: direct production cost, electrochemical performance, impact. Each criterion is scored on scale 0–100, with higher scores indicating better performance. cost rated based material costs, consumption, key equipment process duration space requirements. Electrochemical performance assessed by rate capability cycle stability. Environmental impact CO 2 emissions. provides standardized technique researchers industry professionals objectively compare methods, facilitating identification most promising approaches further scale‐up. total average score across groups electrochemical, chemical, hydrothermal was approximately 60 points, while sintering 39 making it least attractive technique. Combining outlined publications exceeding 60, scheme proposed achieve optimal minimal consumption results demonstrate framework's applicability highlight areas future research optimization cathode recycling.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0