Developing and evaluating the extended epistemic vigilance framework DOI Creative Commons
Tom Bielik, Moritz Krell

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2024

Abstract In science education, epistemic vigilance plays a key role in the development of students' critical thinking by supporting abilities to evaluate expertise level source and claim itself, using rigorous scientific standards appropriate argumentation heuristics. Based on previous studies, which suggested two aspects vigilance—reflecting information that is made—we developed Extended Epistemic Vigilance Framework (EEVF) includes an additional aspect evaluating receiver. empirical exploratory pilot study, we evaluated reliability validity EEVF‐based category system investigated what extent EEVF can be used characterize changes biology graduate after participating course. Results show reliable valid categories for identifying vigilance. A statistically significant increase with small effect size was found regarding references support following their participation However, decrease awareness one‐sidedness claim, context cognitive biases socioemotional influences general, these findings indicate offers improved framework analyze more comprehensively.

Язык: Английский

Effective Strategies for Learning and Teaching in Times of Science Denial and Disinformation DOI Open Access
K. C. Busch, Doug Lombardi

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 6, 2025

ABSTRACT The modern information landscape offers an abundance of options to learn about science topics, but it is also ripe for the spread mis‐ and disinformation denial. Science education can play a pivotal role in mitigating harm from untruthful information, strengthening trust science, fostering more informed critically engaged public. Across articles this special issue, 10 pedagogical strategies address classroom were synthesized. These include: acknowledging social nature knowledge building epistemic networks, addressing directly, Nature (NOS) knowledge, ensuring topics are socially relevant meaningful, modeling critical evaluation how power privilege influence offering multiple sources opportunities students reflect, providing explicit instruction on evaluate supporting development scientific reasoning skills, student perspective‐taking. In addition, areas future research identified. particular, foundational needed understand complex interactions between identities processing. From base, applied create effective educational interventions disinformation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

People who have more science education rely less on misinformation—Even if they do not necessarily follow the health recommendations DOI Creative Commons
Yael Rozenblum, Keren Dalyot, Ayelet Baram‐Tsabari

и другие.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Сен. 2, 2024

Abstract Recent research has highlighted the role of science education in reducing beliefs science‐related misinformation and stressed its potential positive impact on decision‐making behavior. This study implemented Elaboration Likelihood Model to explore how individuals' abilities motivation interact with type processing scientific information peripheral vs. central persuasion routes. A representative sample adults ( N = 500) completed an online questionnaire during second wave COVID‐19 (November 2020) focused two COVID‐19‐related dilemmas involving social distancing recommendations. First, we examined whether relying was associated participants' stances complexity their arguments found that intention reject recommendations use simple arguments. Second, explored motivation, operationalized as personal relevance, abilities, highest level education, knowledge, strategies identify misinformation, were viewpoints justifications. We relevance but also more complex arguments, suggesting people did not intend knowledge rather tended contextualize it. Abilities stance positively correlated argument complexity. Finally, are when making decisions. Respondents higher levels relied less even if they necessarily follow health implies directs greater usage route, resulting deliberative information. Science it appears, impacts evaluation process than outcome.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Narratives of change: how climate change narratives have evolved since the 1970s DOI Creative Commons

Zarina Kulaeva

International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 11, 2024

Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we map the emerging climate narratives from 1970s. Second, examine how these have shaped governance in addressing consequences change. Our analysis based on a set 12 interviews with change experts various fields, including science, environmental policy, and sustainability. theoretical framework primarily draws narrative (Bruner, 1991; Riessman, 2005; Freeman, 2015), specific emphasis its application within studies (Bottici, 2010; Bushell et al ., 2015; Fløttum Gjerstad, 2017). Design/methodology/approach period starts A marked by growing concern creation national global organizations to address effects Semistructured were conducted sample field using analysis. We adopted an inductive approach, allowing emerge organically interview data, facilitating emergence new topics perspectives. Findings Through experts, study identifies three key critical shortcomings related governance. dominant identified are apocalyptic environmentalism, greening capitalism degrowth. Notably, degrowth as dichotomous for understanding interpreting By exploring narratives, highlight five governance: increasing citizen participation through bottom-up model, reforming subsidy framework, strengthening science-policy interface, decoupling economic growth energy dependence developing innovative technological models beyond traditional green approaches. As result, remains confined binary frameworks, challenges that promised be addressed decades ago largely remain unresolved. Originality/value value lies fact that, one hand, it uses investigate governance, other does so different actors. All facilitates holistic 50-year historical perspective, traces evolutionary line points

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Developing and evaluating the extended epistemic vigilance framework DOI Creative Commons
Tom Bielik, Moritz Krell

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2024

Abstract In science education, epistemic vigilance plays a key role in the development of students' critical thinking by supporting abilities to evaluate expertise level source and claim itself, using rigorous scientific standards appropriate argumentation heuristics. Based on previous studies, which suggested two aspects vigilance—reflecting information that is made—we developed Extended Epistemic Vigilance Framework (EEVF) includes an additional aspect evaluating receiver. empirical exploratory pilot study, we evaluated reliability validity EEVF‐based category system investigated what extent EEVF can be used characterize changes biology graduate after participating course. Results show reliable valid categories for identifying vigilance. A statistically significant increase with small effect size was found regarding references support following their participation However, decrease awareness one‐sidedness claim, context cognitive biases socioemotional influences general, these findings indicate offers improved framework analyze more comprehensively.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0