Ecology,
Год журнала:
2006,
Номер
87(12), С. 3186 - 3199
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2006
Spatial
heterogeneity
may
have
differential
effects
on
the
distribution
of
native
and
nonnative
plant
species
richness.
We
examined
spatial
richness
distributions
in
central
part
Rocky
Mountain
National
Park,
Colorado,
USA.
around
vegetation
plots
was
characterized
using
landscape
metrics,
environmental/topographic
variables
(slope,
aspect,
elevation,
distance
from
stream
or
river),
soil
(nitrogen,
clay,
sand).
The
metrics
represented
five
components
were
measured
at
four
extents
(within
varying
radii
120,
240,
480,
960
m)
FRAGSTATS
pattern
analysis
program.
Akaike's
Information
Criterion
adjusted
for
small
sample
size
(AICc)
used
to
select
best
models
a
set
multiple
linear
regression
developed
three
levels
ecological
hierarchy
(i.e.,
landscape,
land
cover,
community).
Both
positively
correlated
with
edge
density,
Simpson's
diversity
index
interspersion/juxtaposition
index,
negatively
mean
patch
size.
amount
variation
explained
hierarchical
ranged
30%
70%.
At
level,
43%
70%
(240-m
extent).
In
general,
always
higher
richness,
inclusion
significantly
improved
models.
66%
both
conifer
cover
type
lodgepole
pine
community.
relative
influence
differed
varied
extent
hierarchy.
study
offers
an
approach
quantify
improve
biodiversity.
results
demonstrate
that
ecologists
must
recognize
importance
managing
species.
The Quarterly Review of Biology,
Год журнала:
1995,
Номер
70(4), С. 439 - 466
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 1995
A
common
assumption
historically
in
ecology
is
evident
the
term
"balance
of
nature."
The
phrase
usually
implies
that
undisturbed
nature
ordered
and
harmonius,
ecological
systems
return
to
a
previous
equilibrium
after
disturbances.
more
recent
concepts
point
static
stability,
which
characterize
classical
paradigm
ecology,
are
traceable
assumptions
implicit
view,
however,
has
failed
not
only
because
conditions
rare
nature,
but
also
our
past
inability
incorporate
heterogeneity
scale
multiplicity
into
quantitative
expresssions
for
stability.
theories
models
built
around
these
equlibrium
stability
principles
have
misrepresented
foundations
resource
management,
conservation,
environemtnal
protection.
In
this
paper,
we
sysntesize
developments
advance
understandings
vs.
nonequilibrium,
homogeneity
heterogeneity,
determinism
stochasticity,
single-sclae
phenomenon
hierarchical
linkages
systems.
integration
patch
dynamics
with
hierarchy
theory
led
new
perspectives
spatial
temporal
dynamics,
explicit
linkage
between
heterogeneity.
major
elements
include
idea
nested
hirarchies
mosaics,
ecosystem
as
composite
changes
time
space,
pattern-process-scale
perspecitve,
nonequilibrium
perspective,
incorporation
metastability.
Both
enviromental
stochasticities
biotic
feedback
interactions
can
cause
instability
contribute
dynamcis
observed
various
scales.
Stabilizing
mechanisms
dampen
destabilizing
forces
incorporation,
environmental
disturbances,
biological
compensatory
mechanisms,
absorpion.
Hierarchical
incorporates
certain
"emergent
properties"
system,
such
metastabilityor
persistence
at
meta-scale,
opposed
transient
local
phenomena.
contrast
derives
from
an
assumed
self-regulation
closed
metastability
deal
explicity
multiple-scale
processes
consequences
most
imporatant
contribution
lies
framework
provided
explicitly
incorporating
scale,
integrating
equilibrium,
multiple
perspectives.
Oikos,
Год журнала:
1993,
Номер
66(3), С. 369 - 369
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 1993
Landscape
ecology
deals
with
the
effects
of
spatial
configuration
mosaics
on
a
wide
variety
ecological
phenomena.
Because
problems
in
many
areas
conservation
biology
and
resource
management
are
related
to
landscape
use,
development
rigorous
theoretical
empirical
foundation
for
is
essential.
We
present
an
approach
research
that
focuses
how
individual-level
mechanisms
operating
heterogeneous
mosaic
produce
patterns
spatially
dependent.
The
framework
we
develop
considers
density
distribution
population
among
patches
as
function
(a)
within-patch
movement
individuals;
(b)
emigration
from
density,
patch
configuration,
context,
movement;
(c)
loss
individuals
they
disperse
through
elements
Ecoscience,
Год журнала:
2009,
Номер
16(2), С. 238 - 247
Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2009
Habitat
selection
is
the
disproportionate
use
of
available
conditions
and
resources,
involves
responses
in
space
time
to
perceived
risks
rewards.
It
frequently
depends
on
scale
measurement,
often
non-linear
ways
that
preclude
simple
extrapolation
across
scales.
More
critically,
animals
select
different
habitat
components
at
scales,
species
vary
their
scales
selection.
Although
multi-scaled
research
has
proliferated,
synthesis
this
work
been
impeded
by
imprecise
terminology
arbitrarily
defined
analytical
Here,
we
review
key
concepts
findings
evaluate
future
prospects
opened
up
part
new
technologies
enable
novel
more
efficient
data
collection.
Innovative
combined
with
approaches,
permits
be
investigated
a
broad
continuum
By
linking
fitness
as
function
scale,
use-of-habitat
assessments
can
effective.
The
costs
benefits
change
scale;
may
inform
us
limiting
factors.
We
outline
how
reward/risk
ratios
used
assess
implications
BioScience,
Год журнала:
1994,
Номер
44(10), С. 690 - 697
Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 1994
Journal
Article
Biological
Integrity
versus
Diversity
as
Policy
Directives:
Protecting
biotic
resources
Get
access
Paul
L.
Angermeier,
Angermeier
Search
for
other
works
by
this
author
on:
Oxford
Academic
Google
Scholar
James
R.
Karr
BioScience,
Volume
44,
Issue
10,
November
1994,
Pages
690–697,
https://doi.org/10.2307/1312512
Published:
01
1994
BioScience,
Год журнала:
1993,
Номер
43(8), С. 545 - 555
Опубликована: Сен. 1, 1993
Journal
Article
Modeling
Complex
Ecological
Economic
Systems:
Toward
an
evolutionary,
dynamic
understanding
of
people
and
nature
Get
access
Robert
Costanza,
Costanza
Search
for
other
works
by
this
author
on:
Oxford
Academic
Google
Scholar
Lisa
Wainger,
Wainger
Carl
Folke,
Folke
Karl-Göran
Mäler
BioScience,
Volume
43,
Issue
8,
September
1993,
Pages
545–555,
https://doi.org/10.2307/1311949
Published:
01
1993