bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 27, 2020
O_LIIn
many
species
that
fight
over
resources,
individuals
use
specialized
structures
to
overpower
their
rivals
(i.e.
weapons).
Despite
similar
roles
for
contest
settlement
affecting
the
winning
chances),
weapons
are
highly
diverse
morphological
across
species.
However,
comprehension
on
how
this
diversity
evolved
is
still
open
debate.
C_LIO_LIUnfortunately,
most
studies
used
during
contests
focus
size
asymmetries
between
winners
and
losers.
Although
such
information
important
understand,
it
does
not
provide
much
regarding
mechanisms
promoting
weapon
diversification.
In
addition,
in
situations,
effect
of
resolution
may
be
confounded
with
body
due
allometric
correlations.
C_LIO_LIOne
way
decompose
relative
importance
outcome
functional
role
weapons.
That
is,
investigate
function
contests,
should
affect
its
function.
C_LIO_LIWe
propose
two
hypotheses
explicitly
associate
determine
contests.
One
based
internal
morphology
-
whether
muscles
within
or
other
fighting
style
injure
rival
not.
C_LIO_LITo
test
our
hypotheses,
we
developed
a
meta-analysis
spamming
31
genera
animal
kingdom.
found
resolution.
Weapons
do
have
them
(e.g.,
horns)
more
chance
than
claws).
Similarly,
throw/push
away
oversized
mandibles)
those
make
flee
jaws).
C_LIO_LIOverall,
shown
usage
function)
evolution
predictable
ways:
without
using
pushing
selected
size,
while
muscled
injuring
strength.
C_LI
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
97(5), С. 1948 - 1966
Опубликована: Июль 4, 2022
ABSTRACT
In
many
species
that
fight
over
resources,
individuals
use
specialized
structures
to
gain
a
mechanical
advantage
their
rivals
during
contests
(i.e.
weapons).
Although
weapons
are
widespread
across
animals,
how
they
affect
the
probability
of
winning
is
still
debated.
According
theory,
understanding
weapon
function
essential
to:
(
i
)
its
importance
in
determining
winner,
and
ii
identifying
what
traits
(e.g.
length
versus
shape
performance)
most
relevant
for
contest
success.
However,
quantitative
evaluations
affects
extent
which
influence
success
lacking.
Here,
we
first
develop
an
individual‐based
model
evaluate
increasing
winner
translates
differences
between
winners
losers.
Then,
meta‐analysis
identify:
whether
different
measures
outcome
differently;
animals
fights
–
i.e.
function;
iii
if
correlates
outcome.
Our
showed
that,
as
increased
chance
mean
difference
losers
also
increased.
Therefore,
our
used
trait
proxy
The
literature
search
identified
49
suitable
studies,
containing
information
52
species,
totalling
107
effect
sizes.
Four
main
patterns
emerged.
First,
focuses
on
linear
weapons,
while
performance
concentrated
Crustacea
Squamata;
other
types
were
rare.
Second,
measurements
greater
than
when
all
combined
(and
only
subset).
Third,
bear
almost
always
perform
visual/tactile
displays
before
engaging
physical
contact.
And
fourth,
way
display
did
not
size
outcomes,
fighting
style
predicted
would
be
higher.
Species
push
or
lift
(even
with
functions)
compared
impact,
pierce,
pull
squeeze.
Overall,
results
show
have
incomplete
animal
built
mostly
few
select
taxa.
Thus,
should
start
focusing
measuring
according
wider
diversity
species.
One
forward
conduct
studies
integrate
morphology
ensure
ecologically
variables.
ABSTRACT
While
the
recognised
influence
of
resource
competition
on
structure
aquatic
ecosystems
is
well‐established,
its
effects
allochthonous
matter
dynamics
in
streams,
particularly
regarding
interspecific
and
intraspecific
indirect
competition,
remain
understudied
inadequately
understood.
In
this
investigation,
we
explored
impacts
leaf
litter
consumption
by
shredder
organisms
Phylloicus
spp.
Aegla
The
were
evaluated
through
a
microcosm
experimental
setup,
comprised
two
controls
three
treatments:
(i)
control
competition‐free;
(ii)
(iii)
within
;
(iv)
(v)
competition.
competition‐free
controls,
single
organism
occupied
2
L
microcosm,
whereas
competitive
pressure
treatments,
introduced
into
4
with
0.05‐mm
mesh
partition.
Our
findings
revealed
that
had
disproportionately
higher
impact
,
more
pronounced
effect
.
demonstrated
superior
shredding
efficiency
compared
to
possibly
due
's
broader
feeding
range
distinctive
utilisation
strategies.
presence
potential
competitors
led
reduced
rates
highlighting
sensitivity
Furthermore,
predatory
behaviour
cannibalism
likely
intensified
species.
These
results
underscore
pivotal
role
shaping
banks,
ultimately
influencing
plant
fragmentation
ecosystems.
Integrative and Comparative Biology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
61(2), С. 643 - 654
Опубликована: Май 9, 2021
In
the
spirit
of
this
symposium
on
physical
mechanisms
behavior,
we
review
mantis
shrimp
ritualized
fighting,
from
telson
to
attack,
as
an
inspiring
example
how
integration
biomechanics
and
behavioral
research
can
yield
a
penetrating
narrative
for
animals
accomplish
important
activities,
including
agonistic
actions.
Resolving
conflicts
with
conspecifics
over
valuable
resources
is
essential
task
animals,
takes
unusual
form
in
due
their
powerful
raptorial
appendages.
Decades
field
laboratory
have
provided
key
insights
into
natural
interactions
diverse
species,
they
use
weapons
against
one
another
sparring
matches
cavities.
These
foundation
functional
morphologists,
biomechanists,
engineers
work
through
different
levels
organization:
kinematics
appendages
move
elastic
that
power
strike,
down
structure,
composition,
material
properties
transmit
protect
high-impact
forces.
Completing
are
studies
defensive
structure
biomechanically
matched
weapon
role
it
plays
fighting.
The
biomechanical
understanding
defense
has,
turn,
enabled
better
whether
assess
during
contests
encouraged
questions
evolutionary
drivers
both
arsenal
behavior.
Altogether,
body
focused
has
presented
perhaps
most
comprehensive
weapons,
defenses
among
crustaceans,
morphology
behavior
evolution.
While
multi-level
analysis
fighting
comprehensive,
implore
need
include
additional
obtain
truly
holistic
other
crustacean
interactions.
Specifically,
molting
environmental
conditions
often
missing
narrative,
yet
greatly
affect
defenses,
Applying
approach
more
broadly
would
generate
similarly
profound
crustaceans
carry
out
variety
tasks
habitats.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
136(1), С. 173 - 186
Опубликована: Фев. 26, 2022
Abstract
Animal
weapons
are
generally
complex
systems
composed
of
more
than
one
structure.
A
crab’s
claw,
for
instance,
is
a
dactyl
(a
movable
finger)
and
propodus
(where
the
muscle
resides).
Any
weapon
feature
that
increases
winning
probability
also
an
individual’s
fitness,
meaning
all
moving
parts
will
be
under
same
selective
force—increasing
their
integration.
By
comparing
to
homologous
structures
not
used
fighting,
we
can
test
whether
fighting
morphological
Here,
tested
hypothesis
by
right
(non-fighting)
left
(fighting)
claws
males
Aegla.
First,
if
shape
size
differed
between
claws.
Then,
compared
degree
We
showed
in
size,
but
both
similarly
high
levels
This
pattern
occur
selection
favours
adequate
squeeze
on
claws,
even
though
squeezing
performance
might
differ
Nevertheless,
important
determining
integration
claw
it
has
been
greatly
ignored
crustacean
studies
its
study
increase
our
knowledge
evolution.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
139(1), С. 57 - 69
Опубликована: Март 31, 2023
Abstract
Animal
weapons
are
diverse
and
often
exaggerated
structures
associated
with
sexual
selection
male–male
combat.
Despite
their
diversity,
our
knowledge
of
these
comes
primarily
from
studies
that
focus
on
the
size
neglect
other
components,
such
as
shape
or
performance.
Furthermore,
can
exhibit
species-level
plasticity
based
nutrition
ecological
variables,
but
few
have
documented
seasonal
variation
in
weapon
plasticity.
Here,
we
investigate
how
size,
performance
differ
across
adult
male
reproductive
non-reproductive
Allegheny
crayfish,
Faxonius
obscurus.
Given
F.
obscurus
cambarid
crayfishes
cyclical
moulting
between
states,
they
provide
an
ideal
system
which
to
questions.
We
found
claws
all
three
components
investigated;
males
were
longer,
stronger
different
compared
males.
Wielding
longer
is
likely
confer
greater
competitive
success
during
mating
season,
demonstrates
unexplored
pattern
discuss
results
considering
seasonality
phenotypes
propose
several
avenues
future
research
using
crayfish
a
model
system.
Journal of Morphology,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
281(9), С. 1098 - 1109
Опубликована: Июль 18, 2020
Abstract
Sexual
selection
influences
the
evolution
of
morphological
traits
that
increase
likelihood
monopolizing
scarce
resources.
When
such
are
used
during
contests,
they
termed
weapons.
Given
resources
typically
linked
to
mating
partners,
theory
expects
only
males
bear
In
some
species,
however,
females
also
weapons,
although
smaller
than
male
Understanding
why
weapons
can
thus
help
us
understand
selective
pressures
behind
weapon
evolution.
However,
most
our
knowledge
comes
from
studies
on
size,
while
biomechanics
as
size
muscles,
efficiency,
and
shape
seldom
studied.
Our
goal
was
test
if
theoretical
expectations
for
sexual
dimorphism
occur
using
two
aeglid
crab
species.
Males
both
species
had
larger
claws
which
were
stronger
female
claws.
Male
more
efficient
females'
(although
we
one
in
this
analysis).
For
shape,
though,
differed
mean
claw
shape.
Regarding
scaling
differences,
higher
females,
a
scaling.
did
not
have
regarding
strength
efficiency
females.
Thus,
apparently
allocate
but
once
allocated,
muscle
follow
similar
developmental
pathway
sexes.
Taken
together,
results
show
involves
differences
size.
Shape
especially
intriguing
because
cannot
fully
its
causes.
Yet,
highlight
subtle
be
detected
by
measuring
analysing
biomechanical
components.
Only
then
might
better
how
forged.