Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: a systematic review DOI Creative Commons
Yue Zhang, Yuxi Li, Dongling Zhong

и другие.

BMJ Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(9), С. e086301 - e086301

Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2024

Objectives To appraise the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19, summarise recommendations assessments interventions evaluate heterogeneity recommendations. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed Embase databases five online guideline repositories: The National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Institute Health Clinical Excellence WHO were searched from their inception to August 2024. In addition, we reviewed reference lists eligible citations grey literature relevant websites. Eligibility criteria selecting studies We included CPGs which provided information about COVID-19. be eligible, issued in English by a nationally or internationally recognised government authority, medical/academic society organisation. If there multiple versions guidelines, latest one. translations, interpretations abstracts excluded. extraction synthesis All COVID-19 extracted summarised. Two reviewers independently evaluated methodological Appraisal Research Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, two other assessed reporting using Reporting Items Practice Healthcare (RIGHT) statement statements. used Measurement Scale Rate Agreement different Results A total 31 included. 14 assessments. At early, development, critical recovery stages most frequently recommended exercise therapy (25.8%, 35.5%, 25.8% 58.1%, respectively). According AGREE II, 17 as low (35%–56%), 10 rated moderate (46%– 62%) four had high (69%–79%). Among rate 22 items RIGHT checklist ranged 10% 100%. consistent (80%–100%). Only one existed minor (60%–80%) disagreements respiratory muscle training relative guideline. Conclusions Rehabilitation should implemented consistently throughout entire process tailored each stage qualities several remain suboptimal. Therefore, developers adhere strictly standard formulate publish quality. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190761.

Язык: Английский

Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: a systematic review DOI Creative Commons
Yue Zhang, Yuxi Li, Dongling Zhong

и другие.

BMJ Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(9), С. e086301 - e086301

Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2024

Objectives To appraise the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19, summarise recommendations assessments interventions evaluate heterogeneity recommendations. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed Embase databases five online guideline repositories: The National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Institute Health Clinical Excellence WHO were searched from their inception to August 2024. In addition, we reviewed reference lists eligible citations grey literature relevant websites. Eligibility criteria selecting studies We included CPGs which provided information about COVID-19. be eligible, issued in English by a nationally or internationally recognised government authority, medical/academic society organisation. If there multiple versions guidelines, latest one. translations, interpretations abstracts excluded. extraction synthesis All COVID-19 extracted summarised. Two reviewers independently evaluated methodological Appraisal Research Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, two other assessed reporting using Reporting Items Practice Healthcare (RIGHT) statement statements. used Measurement Scale Rate Agreement different Results A total 31 included. 14 assessments. At early, development, critical recovery stages most frequently recommended exercise therapy (25.8%, 35.5%, 25.8% 58.1%, respectively). According AGREE II, 17 as low (35%–56%), 10 rated moderate (46%– 62%) four had high (69%–79%). Among rate 22 items RIGHT checklist ranged 10% 100%. consistent (80%–100%). Only one existed minor (60%–80%) disagreements respiratory muscle training relative guideline. Conclusions Rehabilitation should implemented consistently throughout entire process tailored each stage qualities several remain suboptimal. Therefore, developers adhere strictly standard formulate publish quality. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190761.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1