Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic preoperative patients DOI Open Access
Gül BAYRAM, Harun Gülbudak, Taylan Bozok

и другие.

International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 10(11), С. 3979 - 3983

Опубликована: Окт. 6, 2023

Background: Surgeries were performed on emergency and trauma patients as well oncology in many centres during the pandemic period. Screening of asymptomatic preoperative is very important not only protecting healthcare personnel but also preventing nosocomial infections with deficient or suppressed immune systems. The aim current study was to retrospectively evaluate prevalence SARS-CoV-2 infection Methods: A total 3773 among 23385 evaluated Rt-qPCR test. DS CORONEX COVID-19 PCR test (Ver.2.0, Bio nano technology, Turkiye) kit used for RT-qPCR. targets N Orf1ab gene region specific SARS-CoV-2. Results: positivity significantly lower patient group than positive whose routine results other reasons (2.3% vs 23.1%; p<0.0005). Distribution according clinics 7.1% thoracic surgery, 3.7% neurosurgery, 3.5% otolaryngology, 2.6% general surgery 2.4% urology clinic, respectively. Conclusions: this rate never excludes pre-screening patients. Applying tests significant systems infections.

Язык: Английский

Preoperative assessment of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery DOI Open Access
Massimo Lamperti, Carolina S. Romero, Fabio Guarracino

и другие.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2024

BACKGROUND When considering whether a patient is fit for surgery, comprehensive assessment represents the first step an anaesthetist to evaluate risks associated with procedure and patient's underlying diseases, optimise (whenever possible) perioperative surgical journey. These guidelines from European Society of Anaesthesiology Intensive Care Medicine (ESAIC) update previous provide new evidence on existing emerging topics that consider different aspects path. DESIGN A literature review focused organisation, clinical facets, optimisation planning. The methodological quality studies included was evaluated using GRADE (Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, Evaluation) methodology. Delphi process agreed wording recommendations, practice statements (CPS) supported by minimal evidence. draft version published ESAIC website 4 weeks, link distributed all members, both individual national, encompassing most national anaesthesia societies. Feedback gathered incorporated into accordingly. Following finalisation draft, Guidelines Committee Board officially approved guidelines. RESULTS In phase update, 17 668 titles were initially identified. After removing duplicates restricting search period 1 January 2018 3 May 2023, number reduced 16 774, which then screened, yielding 414 abstracts. Among these, 267 relevant abstracts identified 204 appropriate selected analysis. Additionally, study considered reviews, meta-analyses, 9 previously guidelines, 58 prospective cohort 83 retrospective studies. guideline provides 55 evidence-based recommendations voted process, reaching solid consensus (>90% agreement). DISCUSSION This has covered organisational preoperative more objective evaluation patients high risk postoperative complications requiring intensive care. Telemedicine predictive scores biomarkers should guide in selecting blood tests, x-rays, so forth each patient, allowing assess suggest anaesthetic plan. CONCLUSION Each have tailored their fitness undergo procedures involvement anaesthetist. anaesthetist's role essential this obtain broad vision conditions, coordinate care help reach informed decision.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

39

Gender-Specific Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopedic and Traumatology Care: An Analysis of Hospital Admissions and Length of Stay DOI Open Access

Karoly Bancsik,

L. Daina, László Lorenzovici

и другие.

Healthcare, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12(20), С. 2031 - 2031

Опубликована: Окт. 12, 2024

Background: Understanding gender disparities in healthcare outcomes is crucial, especially during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. The absence of gender-specific data on hospital admissions and lengths stay for orthopedic traumatology patients limits precision current analyses, making conclusions speculative. Objective: This study aims to highlight potential insights that could be gained from gender-disaggregated data, illustrating how a more precise gender-based analysis reveal trauma care Materials Methods: A robust would require including variables such as admission rates, stay, injury types, access care, along with factors age socioeconomic status. In hypothetical framework was developed based known disparities, using general trends project possible impacts. Results: Without it remains challenging identify specific differences accurately. Hypothetical scenarios suggest durations, influenced by increased caregiving responsibilities women or differential Conclusions: To accurately assess pandemic, future studies must prioritize collection use data. approach essential drawing reliable developing targeted interventions address inequities effectively.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic preoperative patients DOI Open Access
Gül BAYRAM, Harun Gülbudak, Taylan Bozok

и другие.

International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 10(11), С. 3979 - 3983

Опубликована: Окт. 6, 2023

Background: Surgeries were performed on emergency and trauma patients as well oncology in many centres during the pandemic period. Screening of asymptomatic preoperative is very important not only protecting healthcare personnel but also preventing nosocomial infections with deficient or suppressed immune systems. The aim current study was to retrospectively evaluate prevalence SARS-CoV-2 infection Methods: A total 3773 among 23385 evaluated Rt-qPCR test. DS CORONEX COVID-19 PCR test (Ver.2.0, Bio nano technology, Turkiye) kit used for RT-qPCR. targets N Orf1ab gene region specific SARS-CoV-2. Results: positivity significantly lower patient group than positive whose routine results other reasons (2.3% vs 23.1%; p<0.0005). Distribution according clinics 7.1% thoracic surgery, 3.7% neurosurgery, 3.5% otolaryngology, 2.6% general surgery 2.4% urology clinic, respectively. Conclusions: this rate never excludes pre-screening patients. Applying tests significant systems infections.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1