Physiological outcomes from mind-body resiliency programs in healthcare workers: A scoping review DOI Creative Commons

Jamie Kronenberg,

Justin J. Merrigan, Catherine Quatman‐Yates

и другие.

PLOS mental health., Год журнала: 2025, Номер 2(5), С. e0000332 - e0000332

Опубликована: Май 23, 2025

Mind-body resiliency programs have improved perceived and stress in healthcare workers but less is known about physiological impacts. This scoping review aims to evaluate current methodologies outcomes of different mind-body settings. The initial literature search revealed 19457 studies across seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web Science, Scopus, PsychInfo, CINAHL) from inception through 8/6/2024. Forty-one met the inclusion criteria peer-reviewed original research studying effects (i.e., Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction, yoga, meditation, breathwork, biofeedback) on measures blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate variability, sleep) workers. Two reviewers independently extracted data each included study into condensed tables assessed trends design, methodological processes, outcomes. Conflicts exist balancing high cost validity clinical apparatuses with more effective user-friendly means assessing within real-world Most session investigations found positive impacts immediate outcomes, which expected considering common theme induce parasympathetic states. Programs ≤6 weeks appeared at inducing improvements currently experiencing or impaired resting physiology. Longer (8–12 weeks) generally pressure while having inconsistent variability. Some identified engagement activities resulted greater improvements. Discrepancies findings may pertain variations population descriptions, intervention requirements, methodology recordings. Future work should recruit multiple groups varying levels controls, implement interventions geared towards time requirements workers, utilize validated recordings adequate points throughout beyond determine trajectory long-term adaptations.

Язык: Английский

Eating Pathology and Interoceptive Sensibility Using the Brief Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2: Can There be Too Much of a Good Thing? DOI Creative Commons
Janell L. Mensinger,

A. Reese,

Alan Johnston

и другие.

Journal of Personality Assessment, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 13

Опубликована: Янв. 9, 2025

This study evaluated the factorial structure and invariance of Multidimensional Assessment Interoceptive Awareness-v2 (MAIA-2). We also investigated incremental validity MAIA-2 factors for predicting eating pathology beyond appetite-based interoception. US-based online respondents (N = 1294; Mage=48.7 ± 18.4; 63% cis women; 78% White) were sampled. conducted hierarchical stepwise regressions, dominance analysis, multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses across age, gender, disorder symptoms. An 8-factor, 24-item Brief (BMAIA-2) model showed optimal fit. Using strict criteria (Δ CFI > 0.002), configural, metric, scalar supported. After controlling interoception, higher scores on body listening, noticing, emotional awareness unexpectedly predicted worse pathology, while not worrying, distracting, trusting less as hypothesized. Dominance analysis no subscales contributed >2% unique variance to global disordered For loss control eating, however, worrying was dominant BMAIA-2 predictor, explaining 5% Research supported relevance multiple interoceptive sensibility dimensions captured by understanding eating-based pathology. Future studies should consider assessing its using behavioral tasks autonomic biomarkers interoception better understand complex interplay among skills behavior.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Preliminary feasibility of mindfulness in motion to improve physiological biomarkers of wellbeing in healthcare providers during dayshift hours DOI Creative Commons
Justin J. Merrigan, Maryanna Klatt, Catherine Quatman‐Yates

и другие.

Deleted Journal, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 22(1)

Опубликована: Май 21, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Physiological outcomes from mind-body resiliency programs in healthcare workers: A scoping review DOI Creative Commons

Jamie Kronenberg,

Justin J. Merrigan, Catherine Quatman‐Yates

и другие.

PLOS mental health., Год журнала: 2025, Номер 2(5), С. e0000332 - e0000332

Опубликована: Май 23, 2025

Mind-body resiliency programs have improved perceived and stress in healthcare workers but less is known about physiological impacts. This scoping review aims to evaluate current methodologies outcomes of different mind-body settings. The initial literature search revealed 19457 studies across seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web Science, Scopus, PsychInfo, CINAHL) from inception through 8/6/2024. Forty-one met the inclusion criteria peer-reviewed original research studying effects (i.e., Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction, yoga, meditation, breathwork, biofeedback) on measures blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate variability, sleep) workers. Two reviewers independently extracted data each included study into condensed tables assessed trends design, methodological processes, outcomes. Conflicts exist balancing high cost validity clinical apparatuses with more effective user-friendly means assessing within real-world Most session investigations found positive impacts immediate outcomes, which expected considering common theme induce parasympathetic states. Programs ≤6 weeks appeared at inducing improvements currently experiencing or impaired resting physiology. Longer (8–12 weeks) generally pressure while having inconsistent variability. Some identified engagement activities resulted greater improvements. Discrepancies findings may pertain variations population descriptions, intervention requirements, methodology recordings. Future work should recruit multiple groups varying levels controls, implement interventions geared towards time requirements workers, utilize validated recordings adequate points throughout beyond determine trajectory long-term adaptations.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0