Abstract
In
recent
years,
so-called
organizational
accounts
(OA)
have
emerged
in
theoretical
biology
as
a
powerful,
viable
strategy
for
naturalizing
teleology
and
normativity.
the
wake
of
tradition
autopoiesis
biological
autonomy,
OA
notably
propose
new
meaning
notion
“organization,”
which
they
claim
to
be
capable,
among
other
things,
grounding
objective
observer-independent
normative
teleological
ascriptions.
this
paper,
I
focus
on
last
claim,
asking
“How
are
‘organization’
‘normativity’
conceptually
connected?”
The
basic
insight
mobilized
by
framework
answer
question
is
most
often
expressed
counterfactual
argument
regarding
“conditions
existence”
organized
entities.
show
that
careful
scrutiny
core
reveals
substantial
shortcoming.
To
make
point,
first
analyze
how
positions
idea
via
notions
“dependence”,
“constraint,”
“closure.”
Second,
consider
various
possible
interpretations
norms.
conclude
implications
do
not
enable
deliver
what
promise,
i.e.,
straightforward
link
between
organization
argue
different
needed
capture
intuition
about
normativitiy
suggest
stipulative
route
might
better
suitable
end.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 153 - 193
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Abstract
This
chapter
applies
the
framework
from
Part
I
to
interdisciplinary
explanation
(IDE),
continuing
argument
Chapter
4.
first
reprise
social
action
framework,
then
apply
it
late-stage
low-degree
IDE
(Section
5.1).
Section
5.2
explicates
three-layer
structure
of
collective
intention
for
this
case.
The
result
is
a
set
coherence
requirements
IDE,
analogous
norms
collaborating
agents.
titular
bridge
affords
mutual
relation
between
models
contributed
by
different
specializations.
New
elements
comprising
bridge,
spanning
near
and
far
sides,
reciprocally
connect
in
opposite
directions.
5.3
illustrates
these
with
detailed
example:
array
life
science
concerning
hemoglobin.
example
extends
bridging
account
more
complex,
realistic
projects.
5.4
begins
articulate
epistemic
significance
models,
task
continued
6.
5.5
concludes
summary
results
so
far.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 280 - 321
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Abstract
This
case
study
illustrates
the
EP
approach
for
an
unsuccessful
IDE:
systems
biology
and
cell
reprogramming
explanations
of
stem
cells.
Section
8.1
sketches
social
epistemic
organization
each
community—systems
(inherently
interdisciplinary)
(organized
around
key
experiments).
8.2
examines
explanatory
model
from
community
in
more
detail.
Both
are
models;
one
mathematical,
other
grounded
on
experiments.
8.3
shows
that
IDE
requirements
a
bridging
connection
between
these
models
unsatisfied,
two
possible
points
contact.
8.4
diagnoses
failure
as
due
to
specialized
values
both
sides,
field’s
organization.
These
results
show
how
biology’s
style
effective
community-building
undercuts
this
case,
while
has
little
incentive
connect
with
despite
general
openness
IDR
connections.
8.5
concludes.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 8
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Abstract
This
introductory
chapter
sets
out
the
book’s
guiding
themes
and
aims.
Guiding
are:
explanation
as
collaborative
activity;
diversity
an
epistemic
resource;
engaging
scientific
practice.
Associated
aims
are
to
explore
idea
that
is
collaborative;
show
benefits
of
understanding
through
difference;
offer
inclusive,
open-ended
way
for
philosophers
study
in
The
rest
introduction
previews
overall
argument
results,
concluding
with
overview
chapters
follow.
three
parts,
which
structure
book.
Part
I
introduces
motivates
basic
ideas
explanatory
particularism,
then
develops
framework
using
resources
from
philosophy
science
social
action.
II
applies
interdisciplinary
research
indicates
key
results.
III
illustrates
those
results
specific
sciences
projects.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 54 - 80
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Abstract
This
chapter
adapts
insights
from
philosophical
studies
of
scientific
models
and
modeling
into
epistemic
conditions
for
EP-explanations.
Section
2.1
clarifies
the
sense
“model”
appropriate
to
author’s
purposes,
positioning
this
in
relation
existing
philosophy
science
literature.
2.2
shows
that
meaning
dovetails
with
explanatory
particularist
approach.
The
result
is
a
thesis
(EPM)
interpreting
EP
terms
models.
2.3
illustrates
elaboration
EP,
its
analytic
inclusiveness,
an
extended
case
study:
embryo
stem
cell
research.
complexity
model–model
relations
diverse
community.
2.4
builds
on
result,
proposing
general
framework
characterizing
such
relations.
Later
chapters
put
use.
2.5
concludes.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 243 - 279
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Abstract
This
case
study
illustrates
the
EP
approach
for
successful
IDE.
The
two
scientific
communities
involved
are
immunology
and
epidemiology.
I
show
that,
late-stage
work-in-progress
models
of
COVID-19,
coherence
requirements
bridging
satisfied,
while
participants
also
tend
to
have
associated
pro-social
attitudes.
Section
7.1
describes
each
community’s
social
epistemic
organization,
using
EP/EPM
framework
from
Part
I.
7.2
presents
an
explanatory
model
each:
SARS-CoV-2
infection
immune
response,
epidemiology
guide
COVID-19
vaccine
distribution
policy.
7.3
works
through
a
relation
between
these
models,
arguing
that
all
likely
satisfied
in
this
case.
IDE
yields
insights
interest
philosophers,
scientists,
(potentially)
general
public
(Section
7.4).
7.5
concludes,
recapping
method
results
study.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 11 - 53
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Abstract
This
chapter
introduces
the
basic
ideas
and
background
commitments
of
explanatory
particularism
(Section
1.1),
indicates
contrasts
with
established
philosophical
tradition
1.2),
motivates
particularist
approach
relative
to
that
1.3).
The
last
part
sets
stage
for
rest
Part
I
(Chapters
2
3).
are
epitomized
in
thesis
(EP).
states
a
scientific
explanation
is
product
particular
community
significant,
specialized,
advances
understanding
community.
entails
new
studying
explanation,
which
prioritizes
practice
over
theory,
taking
both
diversity
social
aspects
science
as
central.
includes
monist
assumptions.
A
brief
survey
long-running
debate
about
shows
centrality
monism
tradition.
latter,
however,
not
well-motivated
philosophy
today.
Journal of Applied Philosophy,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
41(1), С. 41 - 55
Опубликована: Янв. 3, 2024
ABSTRACT
Focusing
on
the
recent
work
of
Michael
Bratman
as
emblematic
several
important
developments
in
philosophy
action,
I
raise
four
questions
that
engage
with
a
set
interlocking
concerns
about
systemic
functionalism
action.
These
are:
(i)
Are
individual
and
institutional
intentions
same
kind
thing?
(ii)
Can
risk
proliferation
functional
explanations
be
managed?
(iii)
Is
there
an
appealing
basis
for
apparent
methodological
individualism
our
theories
action
agency?
(iv)
Why
not,
instead,
pursue
methodologically
anti‐individualist
ecological
approach
to
The
latter
alternative,
suggest,
offers
promising
way
retain
many
core
insights
Bratmanian
project
while
avoiding
difficulties
inherent
some
presumptions
strands
contemporary
Living
systems
are
complex
made
of
components
that
tend
to
degrade,
but
nonetheless
they
maintain
themselves
far
from
equilibrium.
This
requires
living
extract
energy
and
materials
the
environment
use
them
build
repair
their
parts
by
regulating
activities
based
on
internal
external
conditions
in
ways
allow
keep
living.
The
philosophical
theoretical
approach
discussed
this
Element
aims
explain
these
features
biological
appealing
organization.
It
addresses
classical
more
recent
issues
philosophy
biology,
fromorigins
definitions
life
teleology
functions,
an
original
perspective
mainly
focused
system,
its
physiology
behavior,
rather
than
evolution.
discusses
revises
conceptual
foundations
presents
updated
version
it.
title
is
also
available
as
Open
Access
Cambridge
Core.
Models
of
consciousness
need
to
explain
both
objective
correlates
conscious
experience
as
well
its
subjective
structure.
However,
such
an
explanation
would
not
entail
a
reduction
exclusively
in
terms
physical
or
neural
systems.
We
briefly
sketch
few
points
contention
with
recent
work
on
integrated
information
theory
and
some
common
assumptions
made
the
neuroscience
more
generally.