Symbol or substance? Scrutinizing the ‘risk transparency premise’ in marketized sustainable finance: The case of TCFD reporting DOI Creative Commons

Roberta Di Marco,

Ting Dong,

Ria Malatincová

и другие.

Business Strategy and the Environment, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 32(6), С. 3027 - 3052

Опубликована: Дек. 23, 2022

Abstract Contemporary forms of “marketized” sustainable finance rely on the production, dissemination, and consumption financialized ESG risk information. In this paper, we scrutinize “risk transparency premise” in context TCFD's climate reporting framework. Adopting lens institutional theory a mixed methods approach, pursue two interrelated aims. First, examine to which extent disclosures TCFD “supporters” from European financial sector adhere information requirements spelled out Second, seek uncover organization level impediments that underlie substantive implementation framework and, turn, production dissemination required Based our findings, argue TCFD/climate is prone become ‘ceremonial’ practice that, at least as now, ‘institutional myth’ might rather serve safeguard ideals market opposed facilitate transformative change towards more environmentally economy. Our findings complement research has problematized contemporary marketized well literature specifically.

Язык: Английский

Sustainable Financing and Financial Risk Management of Financial Institutions—Case Study on Chinese Banks DOI Open Access
Hao Liu, Weilun Huang

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 14(15), С. 9786 - 9786

Опубликована: Авг. 8, 2022

This study examines the relationship between sustainable financing and financial risk management of Chinese institutions, using data from banks. Financial is a comprehensive measure operating performance, asset quality capital adequacy ratio. The structural vector auto-regression model determines two variables. positive shock business negatively impacts In contrast, banks’ positively affects financing. Further subdivision sample revealed that does not always impact large state-owned However, reduces urban green credit proportions. results are consistent whenever compared empirical outcome entire consisting national joint stock bank accounts. comparison helps eliminate possibility biased as major portion joint-stock account. Apart limitations, sub-sample test influenced due to difference in deposit loan interest rates, well different ownership structures

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

22

Evaluating the influence of financial technology (FinTech) on sustainable finance: a comprehensive global analysis DOI
Muhammad Kashif, Chen Pinglu, Saif Ullah

и другие.

Financial markets and portfolio management, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 38(1), С. 123 - 155

Опубликована: Дек. 25, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

13

What you see is what you get? Building confidence in ESG disclosures for sustainable finance through external assurance DOI Creative Commons
Olivier Boiral, Marie‐Christine Brotherton, David Talbot

и другие.

Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 33(4), С. 617 - 632

Опубликована: Ноя. 20, 2023

Abstract The main objective of this study is to understand the value environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure assurance in context development sustainable finance standards laws. This based on an analysis 188 comment letters submitted by such actors public consultations three new initiatives (the CFA Institute, Financial Conduct Authority UK, New Zealand parliament). shows these actors' nuanced often quite critical perceptions effectiveness external preventing greenwashing their reservations about its mandatory nature. These have raised various criticisms, including concerns vagueness surrounding verification practices; lack expertise available conduct a new, specialized, complex field; costs process, particularly for small players; control over reliability ESG data used. article contributes several emerging trends literature—in particular, research practices prevent greenwashing, institutionalization laws, role rational myths process disclosures.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

12

Predictive and prescriptive analytics for ESG performance evaluation: A case of Fortune 500 companies DOI Creative Commons
Görkem Sarıyer, Sachin Kumar Mangla, Soumyadeb Chowdhury

и другие.

Journal of Business Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 181, С. 114742 - 114742

Опубликована: Июнь 5, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5

Symbol or substance? Scrutinizing the ‘risk transparency premise’ in marketized sustainable finance: The case of TCFD reporting DOI Creative Commons

Roberta Di Marco,

Ting Dong,

Ria Malatincová

и другие.

Business Strategy and the Environment, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 32(6), С. 3027 - 3052

Опубликована: Дек. 23, 2022

Abstract Contemporary forms of “marketized” sustainable finance rely on the production, dissemination, and consumption financialized ESG risk information. In this paper, we scrutinize “risk transparency premise” in context TCFD's climate reporting framework. Adopting lens institutional theory a mixed methods approach, pursue two interrelated aims. First, examine to which extent disclosures TCFD “supporters” from European financial sector adhere information requirements spelled out Second, seek uncover organization level impediments that underlie substantive implementation framework and, turn, production dissemination required Based our findings, argue TCFD/climate is prone become ‘ceremonial’ practice that, at least as now, ‘institutional myth’ might rather serve safeguard ideals market opposed facilitate transformative change towards more environmentally economy. Our findings complement research has problematized contemporary marketized well literature specifically.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

18