
International Journal of STEM Education, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 12(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 11, 2025
Язык: Английский
International Journal of STEM Education, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 12(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 11, 2025
Язык: Английский
TechTrends, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 19, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Data & Metadata, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 4, С. 203 - 203
Опубликована: Фев. 10, 2025
This study aims to examine the factors that motivate, attract, and anchor students adopt AI tools during writing process in context of push-pull-mooring (PPM) theory. Utilizing a narrative inquiry research approach, this employed observation, in-depth interviews, document analysis for data collection. The identified key through reflexive thematic methods. Key pull include generation credit authorship contributions integration into academic writing. encompass topic selection, dynamic literature review, questions, proposal conceptualization, designing methods, analysis, revising drafts, managing references. incorporates active learning, self-regulated learning (SRL), inquiry-based overcoming linguistic challenges. push reference inaccuracies, confidentiality research, overreliance on AI. Three anchoring principles guide ethical incorporation thesis writing: institutional policies, augmentation, comprehensive contextual approach. But study's limitations small sample size ten from single university, which affects generalizability results.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Education and Information Technologies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 26, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Education and Information Technologies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 26, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Cogent Education, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 12(1)
Опубликована: Март 6, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Education and Information Technologies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 12, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Salud Ciencia y Tecnología, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 5, С. 1636 - 1636
Опубликована: Март 4, 2025
This study examines the relevance and impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in design instructional materials for vocational education through a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. The draws from reputable databases, including Scopus, Web Science (WoS), ERIC, to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 2024. After applying inclusion exclusion criteria, 28 eligible were analyzed. findings highlight that GenAI significantly enhances material by supporting personalized learning, automating content creation, improving accessibility. It enables development adaptive high-quality resources tailored diverse learner needs education. Furthermore, visualizes research trends using bibliometric analysis, providing insights into evolution distribution GenAI-related across time, regions, themes. However, challenges such as need digital competency among educators, ethical concerns regarding bias quality, potential over-reliance on AI tools are identified. underscores importance balancing AI-driven innovation with human-centered ensure effective sustainable educational practices. Practical recommendations include targeted professional programs frameworks guide integration
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Encontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 30, С. 1 - 20
Опубликована: Март 17, 2025
Objetivo: Realizar uma análise sobre como os principais periódicos, considerando a Área Interdisciplinar da CAPES, tratam em suas diretrizes de preparação artigos e revisão o uso ferramentas Inteligência Artificial (IA) generativa. Método: Trata-se pesquisa descritiva quantitativa, que analisa portais web dos periódicos selecionados com base na quantidade trabalhos publicados programas pós-graduação envolvidos entre anos 2017 2022. Os dados usados seleção foram obtidos nos abertos plataforma Sucupira resultados gerados partir das informações disponibilizadas pelos periódicos. Resultado: Apenas 20,5% analisados mencionam IA generativa nas para elaboração trabalhos, apenas 7,5% no processo submetidos 6% ambos processos. Foi observado relação menção ao impacto as métricas Qualis, CiteScore, JIF H5, assim custo publicação. Conclusões: Observou-se direta Periódicos orientações mais rigorosas tendem apresentar maiores valores nessas custos elevados, sugerindo maior prestígio adotam posturas restritivas quanto dessas tecnologias.
Процитировано
0Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 26, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Language and Semiotic Studies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 4, 2025
Abstract AI-mediated academic writing calls for new pedagogical approaches to the application of prompt engineering courses. Whereas previous studies mainly inform students techniques, little is known about how functions from perspective meaning negotiation between human and generative AI. This paper explores integration Pan-indexical process linguistic signs into a prompt-based teaching model (PBTM), emphasizing its potential facilitate in during early stage writing. The PBTM consists four key components: encyclopedic knowledge, contextual information, evaluative critical thinking, iterative design. lies idea development organized around major steps: crafting initial prompt; refining with information; engaging thinking; progression toward desired response. suggests that linguistics can be employed enhance students’ ability optimization prompts through deeper understanding AI support their process.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0