How could the United Nations Global Digital Compact prevent cultural imposition and hermeneutical injustice? DOI Creative Commons
Arthur Gwagwa, Warmhold Jan Thomas Mollema

Patterns, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 5(11), С. 101078 - 101078

Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2024

The bigger pictureThis paper is a contribution to the discourse surrounding United Nations' Global Digital Compact (GDC) be agreed at Summit of Future in September 2024 that has come forth out Secretary-General's report "Our Common Agenda." Its critical note GDC should not merely reflect digital regulatory superpowers' interests, goals, and problems with respect AI technologies but also incorporate accommodated those global South—geographical regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa Latin America are currently subverted on stage for regulation. Based firstly conception what regulation is, secondly accounts States', European Union's, China's diverse directions, thirdly forms domination arise when realm imposed, this proposes two aspirational principles GDC. first "recognitive consensus key substantive benefits harms," second "procedural coordination essential standards." Our formulation both emphasizes how current discussion skewed few dominant approaches governance We show compact can prevent, one hand, cultural imposition frameworks values domain South and, other disqualification experience citizens from understanding risks deployment. As increasingly being defined, we think it essence shed light its lack inclusion perspectives periphery.SummaryAs geopolitical superpowers race regulate realm, their divergent rights-centered, market-driven, social-control-based require If jurisdictions remain, entailed by hermeneutical injustice related legislation systems will follow. argue consensual shared issues, accompanied proper standardization coordination. Failure attain fragment regulation, enable capture authoritarian powers or bad corporate actors, deepen historical power asymmetries between North. To prevent an unjust landscape where South's hermeneutic resources absent, counter these prospective harms proposed discussed: (1) harms" (2)

Язык: Английский

INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL NA GESTÃO DE CUSTOS: AVANÇOS, DESAFIOS E OPORTUNIDADES DOI Creative Commons
Telma Regina Stroparo,

José Henrique Krokoch de Araújo,

Mônica Aparecida Bortolotti

и другие.

Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 10(6), С. 1446 - 1456

Опубликована: Июнь 10, 2024

O presente estudo tem como objetivo investigar a efetiva utilização da inteligência artificial (IA) na gestão de custos, explorando vasta literatura relacionada ao tema. A pesquisa discute os principais avanços tecnológicos aplicados à bem desafios inerentes implementação IA, que incluem questões segurança dados, cultura organizacional e retorno sobre o investimento (ROI). metodologia empregada é uma revisão integrativa literatura, com abordagem qualitativa. Os resultados indicam que, apesar dos significativos, adoção IA custos enfrenta obstáculos substanciais. dados um ponto crítico, dado frequentemente envolve processamento grandes volumes informações sensíveis. Além disso, resistência mudança dentro das organizações pode dificultar integração novas tecnologias. também se apresenta desafio, visto benefícios financeiros podem não ser imediatos exigem análise detalhada custo-benefício. estudo, portanto, reitera relevância do tema para empresarial, especialmente no tange controle busca pela partir estratégica, considere tanto quanto fatores humanos organizacionais.

Процитировано

1
Keeping an AI on the mental health of vulnerable populations: reflections on the potential for participatory injustice DOI Creative Commons
Giorgia Pozzi, Michiel De Proost

AI and Ethics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 5(3), С. 2281 - 2291

Опубликована: Авг. 20, 2024

Abstract Considering the overall shortage of therapists to meet psychological needs vulnerable populations, AI-based technologies are often seen as a possible remedy. Particularly smartphone apps or chatbots increasingly used offer mental health support, mostly through cognitive behavioral therapy. The assumption underlying deployment these systems is their ability make support accessible generally underserved populations. Hence, this seems be aligned with fundamental biomedical principle justice understood in its distributive meaning. However, considerations epistemic significance still infancy debates revolving around ethical issues connected use chatbots. This paper aims fill research gap, focusing on less familiar kind harm that can cause, namely users capacities knowing subjects. More specifically, we frame our discussion terms one form injustice such practices especially prone bring about, i.e., participatory . To theoretical analysis more graspable and show urgency, discuss case Chatbot, Karim, deployed deliver Syrian refugees. substantiates epistemo-ethical concerns arising from applications among Finally, argue conceptualizing participation capability within framework Capability Sensitive Design first step toward ameliorating discussed paper.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1
Blockchain in Agroecological Certifications: Innovation and the Challenges of Socio-Environmental Autonomy in the Face of Technological Colonization DOI
Telma Regina Stroparo, Nicolas Floriani

Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 18(11), С. e010016 - e010016

Опубликована: Ноя. 26, 2024

Objective: This article explores the application of blockchain in agroecological certifications, through theoretical framework Socially Disruptive Technologies (SDTs), focusing particularly on technosocial disruption, examining how these innovations transform technical processes and social cultural dynamics involved. Theoretical Framework: The foundation relies Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network Theory (ANT), which considers technology as an active actor socio-technical networks. In this context, is analyzed a tool that can modify interactions among farmers, consumers, certifiers. perspective incorporates discussions proposed by Jürgen Habermas Herbert Marcuse to explain risks technological colonization instrumental rationality, may occur when technologies like are implemented without regard for traditional knowledge local practices. Method: Using qualitative approach integrative literature review, research addresses governance observation rural communities. Results Discussion: results suggest disruptive promote greater transparency traceability, yet it also presents challenges socio-environmental autonomy context communities needs be respected, implementation should participatory values knowledge. Research Implications: study discusses applied or influence practices field agroecology, highlighting consequences autonomy. These implications span areas such governance, management agricultural practices, preservation certification systems. proposes hybrid model socially technologies, ensuring they used support tools rather than replacements Originality/Value: contributes essential reflections transformations occurring agroecology exploring interaction between (SDTs) their interconnections with environmental takes critical impacts SDTs Additionally, offers balances innovation sustainable thereby promoting ethical inclusive use emerging production, serving reference future policies sustainability

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1
How could the United Nations Global Digital Compact prevent cultural imposition and hermeneutical injustice? DOI Creative Commons
Arthur Gwagwa, Warmhold Jan Thomas Mollema

Patterns, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 5(11), С. 101078 - 101078

Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2024

The bigger pictureThis paper is a contribution to the discourse surrounding United Nations' Global Digital Compact (GDC) be agreed at Summit of Future in September 2024 that has come forth out Secretary-General's report "Our Common Agenda." Its critical note GDC should not merely reflect digital regulatory superpowers' interests, goals, and problems with respect AI technologies but also incorporate accommodated those global South—geographical regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa Latin America are currently subverted on stage for regulation. Based firstly conception what regulation is, secondly accounts States', European Union's, China's diverse directions, thirdly forms domination arise when realm imposed, this proposes two aspirational principles GDC. first "recognitive consensus key substantive benefits harms," second "procedural coordination essential standards." Our formulation both emphasizes how current discussion skewed few dominant approaches governance We show compact can prevent, one hand, cultural imposition frameworks values domain South and, other disqualification experience citizens from understanding risks deployment. As increasingly being defined, we think it essence shed light its lack inclusion perspectives periphery.SummaryAs geopolitical superpowers race regulate realm, their divergent rights-centered, market-driven, social-control-based require If jurisdictions remain, entailed by hermeneutical injustice related legislation systems will follow. argue consensual shared issues, accompanied proper standardization coordination. Failure attain fragment regulation, enable capture authoritarian powers or bad corporate actors, deepen historical power asymmetries between North. To prevent an unjust landscape where South's hermeneutic resources absent, counter these prospective harms proposed discussed: (1) harms" (2)

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0