Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss

People and Nature, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 2(3), С. 619 - 642

Опубликована: Авг. 5, 2020

Abstract Within a generation, children's lives have largely moved indoors, with the loss of free‐ranging exploration nearby natural world, even as research indicates that direct experiences nature in childhood contribute to care for across life span. In response, many conservation organizations advocate connecting children nature, and there has been rising interest measuring young people's connectedness understanding how it relates their well‐being stewardship behaviour creating programs increase connection. This article reviews literature on these topics, covering both quantitative qualitative studies. It notes this emphasizes positive emotions, global environmental changes biodiversity accelerate. Young emotions worry, frustration sadness they learn about degradation also express are connected biosphere. Therefore review includes people cope information large‐scale problems, identifies practices sustain hope. The concludes by suggesting connection coping change can benefit from integration. A free Plain Language Summary be found within Supporting Information article.

Язык: Английский

---

A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations

Ecosystems and People, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 16(1), С. 304 - 325

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2020

In sustainability science, revising the paradigms that separate humans from nature is considered a powerful 'leverage point' in pursuit of transformations. The coupled social-ecological and human-environment systems perspectives at heart science have, many ways, enhanced recognition across academic, civil, policy business spheres are inextricably connected. However, retaining substantialist assumptions where 'social' 'ecological' refer to different classes entity interact, insist on inextricability theory, while requiring researchers extricate them practice – thus inadvertently reproducing separation they seek repair. Consequently, increasingly drawing scholarship 'relational turn' humanities social sciences propose paradigm shift for science: away focusing interactions between entities, towards emphasizing continually unfolding processes relations. Yet there remains widespread uncertainty about origins, promises challenges using relational approaches. this paper, we identify four themes thinking processes; embodied experience; reconstructing language concepts; ethics/practices care highlight ways which these being drawn science. We conclude by critically discussing how approaches might contribute (i) (ii) transformations sustainability. Relational foster more dynamic, holistic accounts human-nature connectedness; situated diverse knowledges decision-making; new domains methods intervention nurture relationships place practice.

Язык: Английский

---

Making the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration a Social-Ecological Endeavour

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 36(1), С. 20 - 28

Опубликована: Сен. 18, 2020

The United Nations (UN) recently declared 2021 to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Against this background, we review recent social-ecological systems research and summarize key themes that could help improve ecosystem restoration in dynamic social contexts. relate resilience adaptability, stewardship navigation of change, relational values, coevolution human ecological systems, long-range connections, leverage points for transformation. We recommend two cross-cutting new foci; namely: (i) post hoc cross-sectional assessments projects; (ii) transdisciplinary 'living labs' accompany projects as they unfold. With global agendas increasingly taking a perspective, recasting endeavor offers exciting opportunities both practice.

Язык: Английский

---

A leverage points perspective on sustainability

People and Nature, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 1(1), С. 115 - 120

Опубликована: Янв. 31, 2019

Abstract Drawing on seminal work by the late Donella Meadows, we propose a leverage points perspective as hitherto under‐recognized heuristic and practical tool for sustainability science. A focuses places to intervene in complex systems bring about transformative change. recognizes increasingly influential relating changes parameters, feedbacks, system design intent encapsulated given system. We discuss four key advantages of perspective. First advantage : can bridge causal teleological explanations change – that is, is seen arise from variables influencing one another, but also how human shapes trajectory Second explicitly influential, ‘deep’ at which interventions are difficult likely yield truly Third enables examination interactions between shallow deep sometimes, relatively superficial may pave way deeper changes, while other times, be required work. Fourth function methodological boundary object providing common entry point academics different disciplines societal stakeholders together. these strengths could initiate new stream studies, both theoretical advances. plain language summary available this article.

Язык: Английский

---

Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review

Frontiers of Architectural Research, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 11(1), С. 114 - 141

Опубликована: Авг. 31, 2021

In the last ten years, 'nature' and biophilic design have received widespread attention in architecture, especially response to growing environmental challenges. However, open questions controversies remain regarding conceptualizing addressing practice research. This study conducts a literature review discuss as theoretical framework interpret architecture. The following are answered: (1) How has concept of emerged, how can it be defined? (2) what ways contribute goals sustainable architecture? (3) What key strategies design? identifies compares frameworks explains their major elements. We then analyse benefits (e.g., enhance health, well-being, productivity, biodiversity, circularity) achieving sustainability, framed through UN Sustainable Development Goals. results indicate that is more complex richer than mere application vegetation buildings; broadens variety encompassing different types nature from physical, sensory, metaphorical, morphological, material spiritual. Moreover, knowledge gaps identified motivate future research critical reflections on practices.

Язык: Английский

---

Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: Linking care, knowledge and agency

Landscape and Urban Planning, Год журнала: 2018, Номер 179, С. 17 - 37

Опубликована: Июль 25, 2018

Current sustainability challenges – including biodiversity loss, pollution and land-use change require new ways of understanding, acting in caring for the landscapes we live in. The concept stewardship is increasingly used research, policy practice to articulate describe responses these challenges. However, there are multiple meanings framings across this wide user base that reflect different disciplinary purposes, assumptions expertise, as well a long history use both academic lay contexts. Stewardship may therefore be considered 'boundary object'; is, conceptual tool enables collaboration dialogue between actors whilst allowing differences perception. This paper seeks map out literature help researchers practitioners navigate opportunities come with using term. We provide first qualitative systematic review stewardship, identify four distinct literature: Ethic, Motivation, Action Outcome. then develop novel framework thinking through connecting meanings, centered around three dimensions: care, knowledge agency. care dimension relational approaches important areas future research. In efforts scholars engaging more broadly can act helpful 'centering device', practitioners, policy-makers from disciplines pursuit sustainability.

Язык: Английский

---

Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection

Sustainability Science, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 16(3), С. 841 - 858

Опубликована: Янв. 19, 2021

Abstract This article provides a rationale for inner transformation as key and hitherto underresearched dimension of sustainability transformations. Inner relates to various aspects human existence interactions such consciousness, mindsets, values, worldviews, beliefs, spirituality human–nature connectedness. The draws on Meadows’ leverage points approach, places intervene in system, reveal the relevance system change towards sustainability. Based insights from series dialogue reflection workshops literature review, this three important contributions transformations research: first, it increases our conceptual understanding its sustainability; second, outlines concrete elements transformation-sustainability nexus relation points; third, presents practical examples illustrating how work with supporting transformation. In sum, paper develops systematized structured approach transformation, including identification deep, i.e., highly influential, points. addition, critically discusses often contentious divergent perspectives shows related challenges. Finally, current developments research well further needs are identified.

Язык: Английский

---

Linking internal and external transformation for sustainability and climate action: Towards a new research and policy agenda

Global Environmental Change, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 71, С. 102373 - 102373

Опубликована: Окт. 9, 2021

Climate change is an increasing threat to sustainable development worldwide. However, the dominant incremental policy approaches have not generated action at anywhere near rate, scale or depth that needed. This largely due fact climate has historically been framed as a purely external, technical challenge. There urgent need for more integral understanding links internal and external (collective systems) support transformation. related knowledge scarce fragmented across disciplines. study addresses this gap. Through systematic literature review, we analyse how linkages between are portrayed understood in current research. We assess scope, perspectives used understand why, how, relates sustainability. Our results highlight patterns gaps regarding foci, conceptualisation, methods, epistemology, ontology ethics hamper emergent solutions progress. Starting from status quo, propose integrated model of agenda roadmap future research, practice.

Язык: Английский

---

Disconnection from nature: Expanding our understanding of human–nature relations

People and Nature, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 5(2), С. 470 - 488

Опубликована: Фев. 22, 2023

Abstract The human relationship with nature is a topic that has been explored throughout history. More recently, the idea of connection to merged as an important transdisciplinary field study. Despite increased scholarly attention nature, notion disconnection from remains undertheorized and understudied. In this perspective article, we argue for more comprehensive understanding strengthen theories human‐nature relationships goes beyond individual considers social collective factors disconnection, including institutional, socio‐cultural power dimensions. Drawing on case insights, present ‘wheel disconnection’ illustrate how disconnections manifest across or societal meaning‐making processes, thereby problematizing existing research seeks create dualisms between positive negative impacts environment in isolation cultural political contexts. We do not seek discount practical efforts foster individual's by elevating disconnection. Instead, hope creating greater awareness will be able guide opportunities going forward strengthening along continuum social. Read free Plain Language Summary article Journal blog.

Язык: Английский

---

Linking the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem services

Science Advances, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 8(31)

Опубликована: Авг. 5, 2022

Nature contributes substantially to human well-being through its diverse material and nonmaterial contributions. However, despite the growing literature on dimensions of human-nature relations, we lack a systematic understanding how they are linked with well-being. Here, use concept cultural ecosystem services (CESs) as lens explore this interface. Through review peer-reviewed literature, elicit unique pathways mechanisms linking individual CESs constituents well-being, well their relative effects. Subsequently, identify complex interactions latent class analysis multiple correspondence analysis, which delineate five major assemblages that reflect synergies trade-offs at interface We critically discuss key research trends gaps propose directions for future practice leverage potential contributions nature sustainability more broadly.

Язык: Английский

---