Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
16(6), С. 719 - 726
Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2018
Background:
Palliative
care
aims
to
improve
suffering
and
quality
of
life
for
patients
with
life-limiting
disease.
This
study
evaluated
an
interdisciplinary
palliative
consultation
team
outpatients
advanced
cancer
at
the
Tom
Baker
Cancer
Centre.
traditionally
offered
medicine
recently
integrated
a
specialized
psychosocial
clinician.
Historic
patient-reported
clinical
outcomes
were
reviewed.
There
no
priori
hypotheses.
Methods:
A
total
180
chart
reviews
performed
in
8
sample
months
2015
2016;
114
included.
All
referred
management
complex
symptomatology
by
oncology
or
clinicians.
Patients
attended
initial
interviews
person;
follow-ups
largely
telephone,
appointments
conducted
person
those
who
interested
had
concerns.
Chart
review
included
collection
demographics,
medical
information,
screening
distress
measures
referral,
consult,
discharge.
Results:
51%
patient
men,
81%
living
partner,
87%
diagnosis.
grouped
based
on
high,
moderate,
low
scores
5
symptoms
(pain,
fatigue,
depression,
anxiety,
well-being).
High
all
decreased
from
referral
Pain
anxiety
moderate
group.
increased
significantly.
Sleep,
frustration/anger,
sense
burdening
others,
sensitivity
cold
less
frequently
endorsed
Conclusions:
completed
this
consult
service
appeared
experience
reduction
their
most
severe
symptoms.
Visits
during
existing
having
them
attend
half-day
clinic
appears
have
reached
referred.
With
integration,
clinicians
are
able
collaborate
address
needs.
Considerations
include
how
further
integrate
achieve
additional
benefits
ongoing
monitoring
changes
symptom
burden.
Cancer,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
124(20), С. 4072 - 4079
Опубликована: Окт. 15, 2018
Cancer
survivors
face
psychosocial
issues
that
increase
their
risk
of
suicide.
This
study
examined
the
suicide
across
cancer
sites,
with
a
focus
on
head
and
neck
(HNC).The
Surveillance,
Epidemiology,
End
Results
18-registry
database
(from
2000
to
2014)
was
queried
for
top
20
sites
in
database,
including
HNC.
The
outcome
interest
as
cause
death.
mortality
rate
from
estimated
HNC
compared
rates
19
other
were
included
study.
Poisson
regression
used
estimate
adjusted
ratios
(aRRs)
95%
confidence
intervals
(CIs)
1)
versus
non-HNC
(the
combined),
2)
each
individual
site.
Models
stratified
by
sex,
controlling
race,
marital
status,
age,
year,
stage
at
diagnosis.There
404
suicides
among
151,167
2014,
yielding
63.4
per
100,000
person-years.
In
this
timeframe,
there
4493
observed
4219,097
sample,
an
incidence
23.6
Compared
cancers,
almost
2
times
more
likely
die
(aRR,
1.97;
CI,
1.77-2.19).
There
27%
during
period
2010
2014
1.27;
1.16-1.38)
2004.Although
survival
have
improved
because
treatments,
death
remains
problem
survivors,
particularly
those
Otolaryngology,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
159(5), С. 843 - 852
Опубликована: Июнь 5, 2018
Objectives
(1)
Determine
1‐year
period
prevalence
of
suicidal
ideation,
suicide
attempt,
and
completed
among
patients
newly
diagnosed
with
a
first
occurrence
head
neck
cancer
(HNC).
(2)
Characterize
stability
trajectory
ideation
over
the
year
following
diagnosis.
(3)
Identify
at
risk
ideation.
Study
Design
Prospective
longitudinal
study
follow‐up.
Setting
Three
university‐affiliated
outpatient
departments
otolaryngology–head
surgery.
Subjects
Methods
The
comprised
representative
sample
223
consecutive
who
were
(<2
weeks)
primary
HNC,
≥18
years
old
able
to
consent,
had
Karnofsky
Performance
Scale
score
≥60.
Patients
Beck
for
Suicidal
Ideation
Structured
Clinical
Interview
DSM‐IV‐TR
Axis
I
Disorders.
Results
Sixteen
percent
(15.7%)
HNC
<1
from
diagnosis,
point
prevalences
8.1%
<2
weeks,
14.8%
3
months,
9.4%
6
10.4%
12
months;
0.4%
committed
within
0.9%
attempted
suicide.
An
priori
comprehensive
conceptual
model
revealed
2
predictors
in
HNC:
psychiatric
history
(
P
=.
017,
β
=
2.1,
95%
CI
0.4‐3.8)
coping
diagnosis
by
using
substances
(alcohol/drugs;
008,
0.61,
0.16‐1.06).
All
other
predictors,
including
medical
nonsignificant.
A
clinical
assessment
low
71.4%
medium
high
28.6%.
Conclusion
Suicide
prevention
strategies
are
clearly
needed
as
part
routine
care
oncology,
well
their
integration
into
practice
guidelines
HNC.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
17(5), С. e0267887 - e0267887
Опубликована: Май 10, 2022
Background
and
aim
Head
neck
cancer
patients
are
vulnerable
to
various
psychological
complications
due
the
effects
of
both
itself
treatment
on
patients’
appearance
physical
well-being.
Nevertheless,
few
data
have
been
obtained
effective
psychosocial
interventions
that
could
protect
this
group
Therefore,
three-armed,
parallel-group,
double-blind,
randomized
control
trial
(RCT)
aims
evaluate
compare
acceptance
commitment
therapy
(ACT)
mindfulness-based
stress
reduction
(MBSR)
positive
psychology
(such
as
posttraumatic
growth
[PTG],
hope,
optimism),
quality
life
(QoL),
(depression,
anxiety,
experiential
avoidance)
among
newly
diagnosed
head
patients.
Methods
analysis
This
RCT
will
target
who
treated
only
with
surgery
or
not
yet
received
any
treatment.
In
total,
120
meet
all
study’s
inclusion
criteria
none
its
exclusion
be
randomly
assigned
into
three
groups—an
ACT
group,
an
MBSR
a
treatment-as-usual
group—at
1:1:1
allocation
ratio.
Participants
in
two
intervention
groups
(the
groups)
undergo
eight-week
program.
During
program,
each
comprise
eight
modules
based
MBSR,
respectively.
Outcome
assessments
performed
across
three-point
timeline,
including
before
(t
0
),
immediately
after
at
weeks
1
six
months
2
).
The
primary
outcome
assessed
during
is
PTG.
Meanwhile,
secondary
outcomes
evaluated
study
such
QoL,
optimism,
depression,
avoidance.
Trial
registration
number
NCT04800419
(ClinicalTrials.gov).
Registered
March
16,
2021.
Cancer Medicine,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
14(1), С. 1 - 12
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Background
Expressive
writing
(EW)
has
emerged
as
an
innovative
strategy
for
improving
mood
and
quality
of
life.
Nevertheless,
insufficient
research
been
conducted
on
the
impact
offering
EW
to
patients
with
HNC.
Therefore,
purpose
this
study
was
investigate
effects
two
forms
anxiety,
depression,
nutrition,
sleep
in
HNC
undergoing
radiotherapy.
Methods
We
a
single‐blind,
pretest,
posttest,
three‐group
randomized
controlled
trial.
A
total
147
were
randomly
assigned
benefit‐finding
group,
neutral
or
control
group.
The
intervention
group
performed
during
radiotherapy,
each
session
lasting
20
min,
once
week
4
consecutive
weeks.
Patient
nutritional
status,
measured
at
baseline
(T0)
end
radiotherapy
(T1).
Results
After
weeks
intervention,
BF
NW
groups
experienced
improvements
(
p
<
0.05)
compared
those
CG
but
did
not
significantly
affect
patients'
status
>
0.05).
Compared
CG,
anxiety
slowed
down
trend
increasing
repeated
measures
analysis
revealed
significant
×
time
interaction
=
0.017,
F
4.205,
η
2
0.059).
depression
levels
lower
than
baseline,
measurement
that
effect
between
0.000,
16.262,
0.194).
progressively
worsened
from
T0
T1
0.01),
whereas
BF,
it
improved
0.01).
Conclusions
This
provides
preliminary
evidence
are
effective
alleviating
their
status.
Trial
Registration:
ChiCTR2400084964
This
study
aims
to
identify
factors
associated
with
increased
decision
regret
(DR)
12
months
following
treatment
among
head
and
neck
cancer
(HNC)
patients.
A
retrospective
observational
cohort
study.
Patients
newly
diagnosed
HNC
at
an
academic
tertiary
care
center
from
2018
2023.
Data
a
patient
registry
assessing
quality
of
life
(QOL),
DR,
social
support,
anxiety
initial
diagnosis
post-treatment
were
analyzed.
Only
patients
who
completed
the
questionnaire
included.
Among
225
participants,
60%
experienced
mild
DR
28%
reported
moderate
severe
regret.
Stronger
was
advanced
disease
presentation,
free
flap
reconstructive
surgery,
chemoradiation,
recurrence.
more
had
lower
QOL
baseline
months,
higher
support
months.
Multivariable
analysis
identified
multimodal
including
radiation
(adjusted
odds
ratio
[aOR]
3.67,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
[1.25-10.78],
P
=
.018),
12-month
(aOR
1.03,
CI
[1.00-1.05],
.039),
decreases
in
[1.00-1.06],
.024)
as
independent
predictors
DR.
Treatment
involving
radiation,
concurrent
diminished
are
after
treatment.
highlights
potential
interventions
aimed
enhancing
addressing
treatment-related
sequelae,
strengthening
shared
decision-making
prevent
Further
studies
needed
elucidate
driving
subgroups
assess
efficacy
proposed
mitigative
interventions.
Supportive Care in Cancer,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
29(2), С. 1035 - 1045
Опубликована: Июнь 22, 2020
Abstract
Background
Head
and
neck
cancer
(HNC)
patients
often
suffer
from
distress
attributed
to
their
diagnosis
which
may
disturb
sleep.
However,
there
is
lack
of
research
about
poor
sleep
quality
among
newly
diagnosed
HNC
patients.
Therefore,
our
aim
was
investigate
the
prevalence
associated
factors
before
starting
treatment.
Materials
methods
A
cross-sectional
study
conducted
using
baseline
data
NET-QUBIC
study,
an
ongoing
multi-center
cohort
in
Netherlands.
Poor
defined
as
a
Pittsburgh
Sleep
Quality
Index
(PSQI)
total
score
>
5.
Risk
examined
were
sociodemographic
(age,
sex,
education
level,
living
situation),
clinical
characteristics
(HNC
subsite,
tumor
stage,
comorbidity,
performance
status),
lifestyle
factors,
coping
styles,
symptoms.
Results
Among
560
patients,
246
(44%)
had
start
Several
found
be
significantly
with
sleep:
younger
age
(odds
ratio
[OR]
for
each
additional
year
0.98,
95%
CI
0.96–1.00),
being
female
(OR
2.6,
1.7–4.1),
higher
passive
style
1.18,
1.09–1.28),
more
oral
pain
1.10,
1.01–1.19),
less
sexual
interest
enjoyment
1.13,
1.06–1.20).
Conclusion
highly
prevalent
Early
evaluation
tailored
intervention
improve
are
necessary
prepare
these
treatment
its
consequences.
Supportive Care in Cancer,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
32(4)
Опубликована: Март 7, 2024
Abstract
Purpose
The
study
aimed
at
evaluating
the
Effectiveness
of
Comprehensive
Intervention
Programme
(CIP)
on
Quality
life
(QOL),
fatigue,
self-efficacy,
and
psychosocial
distress
among
Head
Neck
Cancer
(HNC)
patients
receiving
radiotherapy
treatment.
Methods
Single-centre
non-RCT
time
series
was
conducted
134
HNC
(67
observed,
followed
by
67
subjected
to
CIP).
FACT-
H&N,
FACT-F,
Behavior
Inventory
scales
were
used
assess
QOL,
respectively.
CIP
provided
intervention
arm
twice
a
week
during
course
radiation
therapy
along
with
standard
care;
control
received
only
care.
Data
collected
before
commencing
radiotherapy,
post-test
assessments
carried
out
end
treatment,
3
6
months
after
completion
radiotherapy.
Results
Repeated
measures
ANOVA
revealed
statistically
significant
improvement
in
QOL
(
F
(1.917)
=
454.103,
p
0.001),
fatigue
(2.106)
183.775,
self-efficacy
(2.429)
190.861,
(2.288)
290.105,
0.001)
arm.
Conclusion
implemented
address
multitude
issues
proved
be
effective
reducing
impact
treatment
The
associations
between
head
and
neck
cancer
(HNC)
anxiety
depression
are
well-known,
but
knowledge
regarding
the
association
demographic
factors
rates
of
diagnosis
treatment
for
these
disorders
among
HNC
survivors
is
incomplete.
This
retrospective
study
utilized
propensity
score
matching
to
compare
selected
new
and/or
depressive
disorder
diagnoses
those
by
sex,
race,
ethnicity,
language.
Results
suggested
lower
likelihood
individuals
male
any
minority,
African
American,
Asian,
Other
while
were
higher
native
Hawaiian/Pacific
Islanders.
Treatment
with
pharmacotherapy
was
less
likely
minority
American
Asian
Hispanic
Spanish
suggests
that
mental
health
may
be
inequitable,
although
further
research
necessary
confirm
understand
underlying
mechanisms.