Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
16(24), С. 10794 - 10794
Опубликована: Дек. 10, 2024
Urbanization
increases
the
number
of
impervious
surfaces
in
watersheds,
reducing
infiltration
and
evapotranspiration,
which
runoff
volumes
risks
flooding
pollution
water
resources.
Nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
mitigate
these
effects
by
managing
volume
quality,
restoring
hydrological
cycle,
creating
sustainable
livelihoods
that
can
promote
socioeconomic
equity
providing
green
space.
In
light
aforementioned
information,
this
study
analyzes
response
NBS
La
Guapil,
a
densely
populated
socioeconomically
vulnerable
area
Costa
Rica
with
approximately
80%
surfaces,
focusing
on
their
effectiveness
stormwater
management
improving
conditions.
Field
data
from
area’s
storm
drainage
system,
as
well
analyses,
were
collected
processed
to
evaluate
RCP8.5
climate
change
scenarios
using
Clausius–Clapeyron
(CC)
relationship.
Three
proposed:
(1)
“status
quo”,
reflecting
current
conditions,
(2)
roofs
improvements,
(3)
detention
ponds
evaluated
SWMM,
latter
scenario
also
Iber
model.
Simulations
showed
Scenario
2
achieved
greatest
reduction
peak
flow
(53.74%)
(57.60%)
compared
3
(peak:
28.37%;
volume:
56.42%).
Both
demonstrate
resilience
projections.
The
results
provide
foundation
for
further
research
into
other
comparable
regions.
Futures,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
159, С. 103362 - 103362
Опубликована: Март 22, 2024
Amidst
multiple
crises
and
calls
for
transformative
change,
the
demand
to
reassess
human-nature
relationships
has
increased.
Rethinking
future
of
cities
is
vital
in
this
process,
yet
positive
urban
visions
prioritizing
nature
beyond
human-centred
perspectives
are
lacking.
To
address
gap,
we
propose
a
"nature-based
desired
futures"
approach
envisaging
building
collective
discussion
around
change.
We
explore
four
concepts
underpinning
(i)
why
such
alternative
futures
needed
(human-nature
disconnect
changing
imaginaries)
(ii)
how
they
might
be
approached
(transformative
change
leverage,
'education
desire').
This
provides
basis
participatory
that
adapts
Three
Horizon
method
2050.
Six
workshops
involving
111
participants
linked
'Conexus',
project
on
nature-based
solutions
European
Latin
American
cities,
explored
emerging
futures,
evolving
ideas
nature,
relationships,
agency.
The
offers
space
reflection
creative
exploration,
weaving
together
new,
hopeful,
caring,
emancipatory
stories.
Its
effectiveness
hinges
mutually
reinforcing
power
deep
structural,
systemic
enabling
approaches,
give
purpose
direction
exploration
futures.
In
an
increasingly
urbanized
world,
urban
biodiversity
is
people's
primary
contact
with
nature.
However,
as
cities
expand
and
densify,
green
blue
spaces
their
are
under
pressure,
risking
declines
in
liveability.
This
Review
discusses
the
benefits
of
multiple
challenges
it
faces,
identifies
opportunities
pathways
towards
developing
sustainable,
biodiverse
for
both
humans
The
substantial
biological
richness
that
areas
can
harbour
helps
to
mitigate
environmental
pressures,
address
adapt
climate
change,
human
health
well-being.
challenged
by
competition
space,
pressures
declining
engagement
residents
Understanding
underlying
mechanisms
informs
efforts
create
maintain
high-quality
blue–green
infrastructure.
Biodiversity-sensitive
socially
inclusive
governance
planning
key
biodiverse,
cities.
Urban
policies
should
move
cross-sectional
approaches
coordinate
sectors
such
health,
education,
design.
Developing
shared
environments
nature
contributes
global
conservation
offers
solutions
social
faced
underpins
ecosystem
services
cities,
but
faces
from
activities,
nature,
inadequate
systems.
provided
biodiversity,
its
promotion
conservation.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
99(4), С. 1458 - 1480
Опубликована: Март 21, 2024
ABSTRACT
Accelerating
urbanisation
and
associated
lifestyle
changes
result
in
loss
of
biodiversity
diminished
wellbeing
people
through
fewer
direct
interactions
experiences
with
nature.
In
this
review,
we
propose
the
notion
urban
wilding
(the
promotion
autonomous
ecological
processes
that
are
independent
historical
land‐use
conditions,
minimal
human
maintenance
planting
interventions)
investigate
its
propensity
to
improve
people–nature
connections
cities.
Through
a
large
interdisciplinary
synthesis,
explore
mechanisms
which
can
promote
cities,
attitudes
relations
city
dwellers
towards
wild
spaces,
discuss
integration
into
fabric
cities
governance.
We
show
favouring
assembly
spontaneity
by
reducing
interventions,
functional
limiting
practices,
plant
diversity
provide
resources
for
numerous
organisms
at
habitat
scales.
These
could
reverse
biotic
homogenisation,
but
further
studies
needed
understand
effects
on
invasive
species
their
consequences.
From
socio‐ecological
perspective,
spontaneous
vegetation
modulated
successional
stages,
grassland
woodland
stages
preferred,
dense
shrubby
disliked.
Wild
spaces
diversify
physical
nature,
enrich
multi‐sensory,
affective
cognitive
nature
However,
some
aspects
cause
anxiety,
feeling
unsafe,
perception
abandonment.
negative
be
mitigated
subtle
design
interventions.
While
has
long
been
thought
as
ornamental
instrumental
help
develop
relational
intrinsic
values
Wildness
singular
aesthetics
should
combined
cultural
norms,
resident
uses
functions
plan
spatial
configurations
promoting
human–non‐human
cohabitation.
For
socially
just
adapted
needs
residents,
implementation
backed
inclusive
governance
opening
up
discussion
forums
residents
workers.
Scientists
support
these
collaborating
actors
experiment
new
Socio-Ecological Practice Research,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2025
Abstract
While
there
is
substantial
research
connecting
urban
green
infrastructure
(UGI)
with
human
health
and
well-being
(HH&W),
less
known
about
how
responsible
actors
address
this
relationship
in
practice.
Based
on
interviews
four
Nordic
cities,
study
examines
UGI
planning,
management,
public
practitioners’
perceptions
of
their
work,
as
well
perceived
barriers
support
for
working
the
UGI-HH&W
nexus.
The
revealed
that
HH&W
was
not
addressed
in-depth
by
either
planners
or
managers,
but
instead
seen
one
many
general
arguments
safeguarding
from
development.
Public
strategists
conversely
had
a
broader
view
presented
examples
strategic
approach
to
cross-sectorial
collaboration.
Planners
managers
face
similar
challenges,
more
positive
among
development
within
organisation.
In
contrast,
are
primarily
deeply
concerned
challenges
results
further
present
range
coordination
efforts,
including
both
formal
groups
experimental
approaches.
However,
policy
implementation
mismatch
development,
accompanied
lack
long-term
perspectives.
These
two
can
be
understood
together,
where
understanding
management
would
provide
an
opportunity
increase
sustainability
current
planning
investment
practices.
A
aligned
offers
path
future
well-being.
AMBIO,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
53(8), С. 1136 - 1151
Опубликована: Март 15, 2024
This
paper
assesses
how
strategic
planning
for
nature
can
be
improved
England's
built
and
natural
environment
using
mainstreaming
landscape-scale
concepts.
Whilst
both
concepts
feature
in
academic
literature,
there
has
been
limited
attention
on
their
role
as
catalytic
agents
planning.
Addressing
this
gap,
evidence
is
used
from
two
stakeholder
workshops
involving
62
senior
policy
experts
managing
a
range
of
operational
hypothetical
spatial
challenges.
The
results
reveal
significantly
weakened
arena
characterised
by
disintegration,
short
termism
uncertainty.
Key
findings
highlight
the
fallacy
pursuing
isolation
wider
integration
fusing
environmental,
economic
social
components
outset.
Current
barriers
to
progress
include
institutional
inertia,
technocratic
vocabularies
neoliberalist
priorities
exacerbated
weak
underlying
theory.
Conversely
opportunities
processes
may
help
knowledge
generation
exchange
within
transdisciplinary
partnerships,
whilst
landscape
scale
thinking
improve
understanding
issues
natures
inherent
geometry
transforming
outcomes.
recommends
adoption
pathways
approaches
working
tandem.
focused
English
context,
our
are
transferable
other
systems
Global
North,
especially
those
championing
neoliberal
market
led
policies.