Philosophy & Technology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
37(3)
Опубликована: Июль 2, 2024
Abstract
In
this
reply,
I
respond
to
Joshua
C.
Gellers’
commentary
on
my
article
“Not
Relational
Enough?
Towards
an
Eco-Relational
Approach
in
Robot
Ethics”
(Puzio,
2024a),
which
present
a
deeply
relational,
“eco-relational
approach”.
This
approach
asserts
that
it
is
necessary
consider
the
relationality
with
non-human
entities
such
as
animals
and
technology
deeper
level
than
has
been
done
robot
ethics
so
far.
disrupts
traditional
ethical
concepts.
his
Ecological
Enough:
A
Commentary
(2024),
Gellers
raises
criticisms
of
method
consequences
eco-relational
approach.
address
these
focus
especially
ecological
responsibility
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Март 19, 2025
Abstract
The
new
avatars
and
bots
modeled
after
humans,
the
large
language
models
(LLMs)
with
a
“persona,”
seemingly
autonomously
acting
robots
raise
question
of
whether
AI
technologies
can
also
possess
personhood
or
at
least
be
part
our
personhood.
Do
we
extend
through
living
death
in
digital
realm?
This
article
explores
application
moral
concept
to
technologies.
It
presents
twofold
thesis:
first,
it
illustrates,
various
examples,
how
is
being
disrupted
context
Second,
discusses
potential
evolution
argues
for
abandoning
ethics,
based
on
reasons
such
as
its
vagueness,
harmful
discriminatory
character,
disconnection
from
society.
Finally,
outlines
future
perspectives
approaches
moving
forward,
emphasizing
need
conceptual
justice
concepts.
Abstract
Technological
advancements
raise
anthropological
questions:
How
do
humans
differ
from
technology?
Which
human
capabilities
are
unique?
Is
it
possible
for
robots
to
exhibit
consciousness
or
intelligence,
capacities
once
taken
be
exclusively
human?
Despite
the
evident
need
an
lens
in
both
societal
and
research
contexts,
philosophical
anthropology
of
technology
has
not
been
established
as
a
set
discipline
with
defined
theories,
especially
concerning
emerging
technologies.
In
this
paper,
I
will
utilize
New
Materialist
approach,
focusing
particularly
on
theories
Donna
Haraway
Karen
Barad,
explore
their
potential
technology.
aim
develop
techno-anthropological
approach
that
is
informed
enriched
by
Materialism.
This
characterized
its
relational
perspective,
dynamic
open
conception
being,
attention
diversity
dynamics
power
knowledge
production
ontology,
emphasis
non-human.
outline
centered
Materialism,
wherein
focus,
paradoxically,
but
equally
non-human
entities
entanglement
As
become
clear,
way
we
understand
relationship
fundamental
our
concepts
ethics
