Biochar Is Superior to Organic Substitution for Vegetable Production—A Revised Approach for Net Ecosystem Economic Benefit DOI Creative Commons

Ruiyu Bi,

Bingxue Wang, Xintong Xu

и другие.

Agronomy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(11), С. 2693 - 2693

Опубликована: Ноя. 15, 2024

Biochar amendment and substituting chemical fertilizers with organic manure (organic substitution) have been widely reported to improve intensive vegetable production. However, considering its high potential for reducing carbon reactive nitrogen (Nr) footprints, very few comprehensive evaluations performed on the environmental economic aspects of biochar or substitution. In this study, damage costs from Nr measured using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, followed a cradle-to-gate approach, storage benefits were incorporated into newly constructed net ecosystem benefit (NEEB) frame in addition conventional product income–input cost-benefit methods. One kilogram harvested vegetables carbon/Nr footprints one hectare cultivated land per crop cost adopted as functional units multi-cropping characteristics Five fertilization treatments included: no fertilizer (CK); synthetic application (SN); (NB); substitution (NM); combination (NMB). These investigated five consecutive years rotations typically intensified production region China. Adopting revised NEEB NB significantly reduced footprint by 73.0% compared treatment. Meanwhile, increased total 9.7% damages 52.7% NM, generating highest NEEB, making it most effective strategy among all treatments. It was 4.3% higher which not significant, but than SN NMB, 23.0% 13.6%, respectively. This finding highlights importance properly assessing is important developing agricultural management strategies promoting more sustainable approach.

Язык: Английский

Comparative Carbonization Study of Pyrolyzed Biomass: New Insights Into the Structure and Composition Evolution of Biochar DOI

Tao Wei,

Haoqun Hong,

Haiyan Zhang

и другие.

BioEnergy Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 18(1)

Опубликована: Янв. 20, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Bamboo-derived biochars: physicochemical properties and implications for soil fertility and sustainability DOI

Krisnna Sousa Alves,

Tiago Guimarães,

Ricardo de Carvalho Bittencout

и другие.

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 4, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Pyrolyzed Agro-Food By-Products: A Sustainable Alternative to Coal DOI Open Access
Lukáš Jeníček, Jan Malaťák, Jan Velebil

и другие.

Materials, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 18(7), С. 1495 - 1495

Опубликована: Март 27, 2025

This study investigates the potential use of biochar derived from residues-such as spruce wood, spent coffee grounds, tea waste, and nutshells-as a sustainable coal substitute-to enhance decarbonization European energetic systems decrease dependence on fossil fuels. The biomasses were pyrolyzed at 250-550 °C, analyzed for calorific value composition, evaluated energy retention mass loss. results show significant density improvements, with optimal temperatures varying by material (e.g., wood reached 31.56 MJ·kg-1 550 retaining 21.84% its mass; grounds peaked 31.26 350 37.53%). Economic analysis confirmed biomass cost-effective alternative to coal, especially considering emission allowance costs. Integrating pyrolysis into regional supports decarbonization, reduces emissions, advances us towards circular economy.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Biochar Is Superior to Organic Substitution for Vegetable Production—A Revised Approach for Net Ecosystem Economic Benefit DOI Creative Commons

Ruiyu Bi,

Bingxue Wang, Xintong Xu

и другие.

Agronomy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(11), С. 2693 - 2693

Опубликована: Ноя. 15, 2024

Biochar amendment and substituting chemical fertilizers with organic manure (organic substitution) have been widely reported to improve intensive vegetable production. However, considering its high potential for reducing carbon reactive nitrogen (Nr) footprints, very few comprehensive evaluations performed on the environmental economic aspects of biochar or substitution. In this study, damage costs from Nr measured using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, followed a cradle-to-gate approach, storage benefits were incorporated into newly constructed net ecosystem benefit (NEEB) frame in addition conventional product income–input cost-benefit methods. One kilogram harvested vegetables carbon/Nr footprints one hectare cultivated land per crop cost adopted as functional units multi-cropping characteristics Five fertilization treatments included: no fertilizer (CK); synthetic application (SN); (NB); substitution (NM); combination (NMB). These investigated five consecutive years rotations typically intensified production region China. Adopting revised NEEB NB significantly reduced footprint by 73.0% compared treatment. Meanwhile, increased total 9.7% damages 52.7% NM, generating highest NEEB, making it most effective strategy among all treatments. It was 4.3% higher which not significant, but than SN NMB, 23.0% 13.6%, respectively. This finding highlights importance properly assessing is important developing agricultural management strategies promoting more sustainable approach.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0