Lysimeter Deep N Fertilizer Placement Reduced Leaching and Improved N Use Efficiency DOI Creative Commons
Katrin Rychel, Katharina Meurer, Gizachew Tarekegn Getahun

и другие.

Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2022, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 13, 2022

Abstract Deep fertilization has been tested widely for nitrogen (N) use efficiency but there is little evidence of its impact on N leaching and the interplay between climate factors crop use. In this study, we effect three fertilizer placements greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leaching, growth in a lysimeter experiment over 33-month period comprised years with spring-sown cereals (S1, S2, S3) preceding 11-month (F1) subsequent 15-month (F2) fallow period. addition to control no (Control), 100 kg ha − 1 year ammonium nitrate was placed at 0.2 m (Deep), 0.07 (Shallow), or halved (Mixed). reduced leachate amount each except F1, significant reductions (p < 0.05) drought (S2) cumulatively S1-S3. Overall, water flow by 22, 25 34% compared Shallow, Mixed Control, respectively. across S1-S3 further loads 15% significantly lowest among fertilized treatments S1 S2. S3, increased grain yields 28 22% Shallow Mixed, respectively, while maintaining high content nearly doubling agronomic (AE ) recovery (RE ). placement promising mitigation practice that should be investigated.

Язык: Английский

Deep Fertilization Is More Beneficial than Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizer on Crop Productivity and Environmental Cost: Evidence from a Global Meta-Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Qi Wu, Hua Huang,

Qinhe Wang

и другие.

Agronomy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(5), С. 1103 - 1103

Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2025

It is unclear whether enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF) or deep fertilization strategies (DF) can simultaneously improve crop productivity and reduce gaseous nitrogen losses. The DF strategy’s investment cost lower than that of EEF’s, with more potential for large-scale promotion. However, there still a need comprehensive comparison evaluation EEF’s effects on Here, we examine the EEF yield, use (NUE), nitrous oxide (N2O) ammonia (NH3) emissions by meta-analysis published studies. We collected peer-reviewed articles in recent decades conducted global meta-analysis, explored their responses to different climatic, field management practices, environmental factors. results showed compared urea application surface, significantly increased yields 7.52% 13.88% NUE 25.84% 36.27% reduced N2O 37.98% 34.18% NH3 42.37% 69.68%, respectively. strategy superior EEF. Due differences climatic factors, soil properties, improving loss vary. most cases, beneficial Compared EEF, yield 84.63% volatilization 64.47%, yield-scaled emission 13.32%, 60.23%. Therefore, emphasize achieve higher yields, utilization efficiency, nitrogen, which sustainable development agricultural ecosystems. research provide valuable information costs under an effective type management.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Deep placement of controlled-release and common urea achieves the win–win of enhancing maize productivity and decreasing environmental pollution DOI
Peng Wu, Jinyu Yu,

Qinhe Wang

и другие.

European Journal of Agronomy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 164, С. 127484 - 127484

Опубликована: Дек. 19, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Changing Drip Fertigation Strategy to Decrease Greenhouse Agroecosystem Soil Nitrate Residue and Improve Tomato Production in Northwest of China DOI
You Wu, Jiale Zhang, Shicheng Yan

и другие.

Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 24(3), С. 4565 - 4580

Опубликована: Июнь 20, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Impact of fertilization depth on sunflower yield and nitrogen utilization: a perspective on soil nutrient and root system compatibility DOI Creative Commons

Wenhao Ren,

Xianyue Li, Tingxi Liu

и другие.

Frontiers in Plant Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 15

Опубликована: Авг. 14, 2024

Introduction The depth of fertilizer application significantly influences soil nitrate concentration (SNC), sunflower root length density (RLD), nitrogen uptake (SNU), and yield. However, current studies cannot precisely capture subtle nutrient variations between layers their complex relationships with growth. They also struggle to assess the impact different depths on development distribution as well response spatial temporal nutrients. Methods Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) model was employed explore patterns in at three controlled-release (CRF) placement depths: 5, 15, 25 cm. This study investigated characteristics system regarding absorption utilization analyzed correlation yield formation. Furthermore, this introduced modified Jaccard index (considering compatibility density) analyze soil-root interactions, providing a deeper insight into how changes CRF affect crop growth efficiency. Results results indicated that fertilization 15 cm improved by 6.60% 7.34% compared 5 depths, respectively, maximizing (an increase 9.44%) rate 5.40%). promoted greater Root Length Density an increases 11.95% 16.42% those cm, enhancing improving uptake. In contrast, shallow led higher concentrations topsoil, whereas increased layers. Discussion These provide valuable insights for precision agriculture sustainable management, highlighting importance optimizing through tailored strategies enhance production efficiency minimize environmental impact.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

In-Season Nitrogen Management in the Root Zone of Wheat in a Calcareous Soil Using the Response Index DOI
Ali M. Ali, Ahmed M. Saudi, S. Ibrahim

и другие.

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 16

Опубликована: Дек. 10, 2024

Excessive and inappropriate nitrogen (N) fertilizer applications on calcareous soils result in significant losses, necessitating a targeted approach for improved efficiency yield. Field experiments were conducted over two seasons to develop strategy root-zone (RZ) N fertilization wheat. In the first season, three methods of application used: surface (SF), RZ at depth 10 cm (RZF10), 20 (RZF20). The was applied range 0–280 kg ha−1. second another experiment carried out validate results. data showed that achieve maximum yield levels, rates 264 ha−1 SF, 218 RZF10, 183 RZF20 required. findings also revealed relocating from depths resulted an increase recovery by 11.2% 31.2%, respectively. A linear equation established relationship between response index harvest (RI-Harvest) corrective rate RZF20. in-season normalized difference vegetation effectively predicted RI-Harvest, leading development empirical predict rate. validation demonstrated effectiveness proposed adjusting based crop-specific needs. This allows growers optimize profits carefully applying RZ, eliminating both excessive inadequate use.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Lysimeter Deep N Fertilizer Placement Reduced Leaching and Improved N Use Efficiency DOI Creative Commons
Katrin Rychel, Katharina Meurer, Gizachew Tarekegn Getahun

и другие.

Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2022, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 13, 2022

Abstract Deep fertilization has been tested widely for nitrogen (N) use efficiency but there is little evidence of its impact on N leaching and the interplay between climate factors crop use. In this study, we effect three fertilizer placements greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leaching, growth in a lysimeter experiment over 33-month period comprised years with spring-sown cereals (S1, S2, S3) preceding 11-month (F1) subsequent 15-month (F2) fallow period. addition to control no (Control), 100 kg ha − 1 year ammonium nitrate was placed at 0.2 m (Deep), 0.07 (Shallow), or halved (Mixed). reduced leachate amount each except F1, significant reductions (p < 0.05) drought (S2) cumulatively S1-S3. Overall, water flow by 22, 25 34% compared Shallow, Mixed Control, respectively. across S1-S3 further loads 15% significantly lowest among fertilized treatments S1 S2. S3, increased grain yields 28 22% Shallow Mixed, respectively, while maintaining high content nearly doubling agronomic (AE ) recovery (RE ). placement promising mitigation practice that should be investigated.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0