Dupilumab improves clinical and histologic features of eosinophilic esophagitis prior to 12 weeks of treatment DOI Creative Commons
Twan Sia,

Amanda Miller,

Leeon Bacchus

и другие.

Clinical and Translational Allergy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(1)

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024

Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-4 receptor alpha subunit. an approved treatment for inducing remission of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).1 EoE histologic with dupilumab has only been demonstrated in patients after at least 12 weeks treatment.2-6 Current guidelines recommend waiting re-evaluation until 20–24 dupilumab.1 It unknown if increasing length improves its efficacy. Because requires invasive biopsies, and important to prevent progressive esophageal damage, research investigating the effects on prior warranted. We conducted retrospective study single medical clinic. The electronic record was searched between 2017 2023 using International Classifications Disease, 10th revision code K20.0 esophagitis. excluded who had (1) never started dupilumab; (2) no confirmation defined by ≥ 15 eos/hpf; or (3) while dupilumab. Histologic evaluation assessed 2 biopsies each proximal, middle, distal esophagus. Endpoints were peak eosinophil counts (eosinophils per high-power field; eos/hpf), endoscopic reference scores (EREFS), composite symptom score which (dysphagia, food impaction/choking, regurgitation/vomiting, heartburn/chest pain, abdominal pain) graded (0 = absent, 1 mild, moderate, 3 severe) summed. This deemed exempt from institutional review board approval WCG IRB. From record, 658 identified, 534 initiated dupilumab, 6 did not have EoE, 39 repeat initiation. Therefore, 79 included this study. median age 27.6 years (Q1 Q3, 21.8–36.1), 48 (60.8%) male, (15.2%) pediatric (Table 1). Sixty (75.9%) atopic comorbidity, including allergic rhinitis (43 patients, 54.4%), asthma (27 34.2%), dermatitis (13 16.5%), allergies (30 38.0%). Patients 22.7 16–26.7). Dosages 300 mg every week (71 89.9%), other loading dose 600 (7 8.9%), 200 400 (1 patient, 1.3%). Of 0–12 weeks. 5.5 4–6), significantly decreased 0 0–1; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, p 0.000488) Median 44.5 eos/hpf 32.5–53.5) baseline 0–15.5; 0.000977) Endoscopic available (19%) our cohort. In weeks, EREFS decrease (median, 2; Q1 1–4) versus 0; 0–1.5; 0.25). However, change also insignificant 12–24 (p 0.13), greater than 24 0.25), suggesting insignificance may be due low n. induce clinical benefit treatment. There significant differences changes 0.1350), count 0.0746); 0.8771) 12, 12–24, terms response, 9 (75%) histologically responsive group, 28 (73.7%) 26 (89.7%) longer group. difference proportion response groups (Fisher's exact 0.2569). Subanalysis 7 >1 evaluations summarized Figure 1. Three unresponsive early timepoints (Patient 4 Patient 5 weeks) without addition combination therapy. contrast, remained over therapy omeprazole mometasone, respectively. their Our subanalysis suggests that certain are EGDs respond later timepoints. Further needed predict EGDs. Swimmer plot multiple * indicates mometasone 1.6 twice daily. ** 20 once *** mg, as opposed week. conclusion, induced before treatment, there clinical, histologic, 2–24 beneficial identify earlier previous indicate.1 should investigate appropriate window performed. Twan Sia: Conceptualization (equal); data curation formal analysis investigation methodology validation visualization writing—original draft writing—review editing (equal). Amanda Miller: Data Leeon Bacchus: Jennie Young: Aditya P. Narayan: Rachel Solecki: Investigation Jerry Fu: Yuting Jiang: Raisa Khuda: Stanley Liu: Kathleen Love: Shibani Mallik: Amina Sara Matmatte: Paige McDonald: Tanvi Telukunta: Alyssa Roby: Saad Shami: Michelle Zheng: Madison Headen: John Leung: project administration resources supervision None. consultant Devine; Millimet Branch Professional Education; Sanofi; Huron Consulting Services LLC; Takeda; Ribon Therapeutics; Tegus; Slingshot; Guidepoint; Cowen; AstraZeneca; Regeneron; AbbVie. None authors relevant conflicts interests disclose. received specific grant any funding agency public, commercial, not-for-profit sectors. All de-identified materials stored HIPPA-compliant, password-protected, cloud-based storage. Access these files will provided upon reasonable request corresponding author, Leung.

Язык: Английский

Mepolizumab for treatment of adolescents and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial DOI
Evan S. Dellon, Kathryn A. Peterson,

Benjamin Mitlyng

и другие.

Gut, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 72(10), С. 1828 - 1837

Опубликована: Июль 9, 2023

We aimed to determine whether mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 antibody, was more effective than placebo for improving dysphagia symptoms and decreasing oesophageal eosinophil counts in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

47

New insights into the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis DOI Creative Commons
Ilja Střı́ž, Korneliusz Golebski, Zuzana Střížová

и другие.

Clinical Science, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 137(9), С. 727 - 753

Опубликована: Май 1, 2023

Abstract Asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) are respiratory diseases. These two disorders often co-exist based on common anatomical, immunological, histopathological, pathophysiological basis. Usually, asthma comorbid CRSwNP is driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation which predisposes to more severe, intractable, disease. In the past decades, innovative technologies detection techniques in combination newly introduced targeted therapies helped shape our understanding of immunological pathways underlying inflammatory airway diseases further identify several distinct clinical subsets enhance development effective personalized treatments. Presently, a number biologics has shown efficacy patients refractory T2 inflammation, including anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab)/anti-IL5R (benralizumab), anti-IL-4R-α (anti-IL-4/IL-13, dupilumab), anti-TSLP (tezepelumab). non-type-2 endotypes, no have consistently so far. multiple therapeutical targets being explored cytokines, membrane molecules intracellular signalling expand current treatment options for severe CRSwNP. this review, we discuss existing biologics, those under share some views new horizons.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

33

Real-World Efficacy of Dupilumab in Severe, Treatment-Refractory, and Fibrostenotic Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis DOI Open Access
Chris Lee, Evan S. Dellon

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 22(2), С. 252 - 258

Опубликована: Сен. 3, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

32

Identifying Children at Risk of Growth and Nutrient Deficiencies in the Food Allergy Clinic DOI
Carina Venter, Rosan Meyer,

Maureen Bauer

и другие.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12(3), С. 579 - 589

Опубликована: Янв. 25, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

14

The 1st EoETALY Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis–Current Treatment and Monitoring DOI
Nicola de Bortoli, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Roberto Penagini

и другие.

Digestive and Liver Disease, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 56(7), С. 1173 - 1184

Опубликована: Март 22, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

14

Decisions With Patients, Not for Patients: Shared Decision-Making in Allergy and Immunology DOI Creative Commons
Douglas P. Mack, Matthew Greenhawt, Don A. Bukstein

и другие.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12(10), С. 2625 - 2633

Опубликована: Июнь 6, 2024

Shared decision-making (SDM) is an increasingly implemented patient-centered approach to navigating patient preferences regarding diagnostic and treatment options supported decision-making. This therapeutic prioritizes the patient's perspectives, considering current medical evidence provide a balanced clinical scenarios. In light of numerous recent guideline recommendations that are conditional in nature scenarios defined by preference-sensitive care options, there tremendous opportunity for SDM validated decision aids. Despite expansion literature on SDM, formal acceptance among clinicians remains inconsistent. Surprisingly, significant disparity exists between clinicians' self-reported adherence principles patients' perceptions its implementation during encounters. discrepancy underscores fundamental issue delivery health care, where may overestimate their integration while experiences suggest otherwise. review critically examines factors contributing this inconsistency, including barriers within system, clinician attitudes behaviors, expectations preferences. By elucidating these fields food allergy, asthma, eosinophilic esophagitis, other allergic diseases, aims insights into bridging gap perception experience SDM. Addressing discordance crucial advancing ensuring not merely theoretical concept but tangible reality the.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

9

The New Therapeutic Frontiers in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Biological Drugs DOI Open Access
Erminia Ridolo, Alessandro Barone,

Martina Ottoni

и другие.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 25(3), С. 1702 - 1702

Опубликована: Янв. 30, 2024

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a multifaceted disease characterized by wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, endoscopic and histopathologic patterns, responsiveness to therapy. From the perspective an effective approach patient, different inflammatory mechanisms involved in pathogenesis EoE biologics, particular monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), targeting these pathways are needed. Currently, most relevant dupilumab, which interferes with both interleukin (IL)-4 IL-13 binding IL-4 receptor α, only mAb approved European Medicine Agency US Food Drug Administration for treatment EoE. Other mAbs investigated include mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab (interfering IL-5 axis), cendakimab dectrekumab (anti-IL-13s), tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), lirentelimab (anti-SIGLEG-8), many others. Despite undeniable economic impact biologic therapies, near future, there will be room further reflection about opportunity prescribe agents, not as last-line therapy selected cases such patients comorbidities involving common pathways. Although recent findings very encouraging, road permanent success still long, studies needed determine long-term effects discover new potential targets.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

7

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis DOI Creative Commons
Amiko M. Uchida, Caitlin M. Burk, Marc E. Rothenberg

и другие.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 11(9), С. 2654 - 2663

Опубликована: Июнь 28, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

13

Pediatric asthma comorbidities: Global impact and unmet needs DOI Creative Commons
Elham Hossny, Yuichi Adachi,

Eleni Anastasiou

и другие.

World Allergy Organization Journal, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 17(5), С. 100909 - 100909

Опубликована: Май 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

Eosinophilic esophagitis in the era of biologics DOI Creative Commons
Carlo Maria Rossi, Giovanni Santacroce, Marco Vincenzo Lenti

и другие.

Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 18(6), С. 271 - 281

Опубликована: Июнь 2, 2024

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory, disabling disorder characterized by prominent eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms including dysphagia and food impaction. The natural history EoE poorly known, but it may lead esophageal strictures. therapeutic armamentarium expected grow in near future, especially due availability novel biological therapies targeting crucial inflammatory pathways EoE.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4