"Human or artificial intelligence?": an empirical study of respondents' declared preferences in digital graphics

Человек и культура, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 1, С. 37 - 49

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Currently, technologies based on the use of artificial intelligence are being integrated into most spheres life in modern society, which determines relevance research topic. The initial stages this movement were associated with solving problems optimizing routine processes, but recently there has been a tendency to introduce innovative neural network practices such areas as culture and art, considered prerogative man. purpose work is experimentally identify respondents' declared preferences between digital graphic works created by humans intelligence. This will allow us give an objective assessment potential generative technologies, their ability compete copyrighted works, well degree influence vectors further development field artistic creativity creative design. A target group 62 respondents skills was formed for empirical study. data collected method using Google Forms. methods quantitative statistical analysis used during performance stage. no formalized criteria evaluating quality images. scientific novelty study lies fact that, results opinions qualified survey participants, emotional perception existing practical experience, announced determined first time. In general, demonstrated commitment author projects score 55.5% (the answer "yes" – 20.3%, "rather yes" 35.2%), while illustrations developed received 44.5% 13.5%, 31.0%). obtained can be theoretical importance artists designers, researchers teaching staff educational institutions providing training training. timely response large-scale changes when basic concepts art undergoing transformation, rethinking algorithms creating introducing new forms organizing process.

Язык: Английский

Teachers' perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) educational learning tools: An exploratory study on AI literacy for young students

Future in Educational Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 23, 2024

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy education for young students is gaining traction among researchers and educators. Researchers are developing courses attempting to teach AI younger students, using age‐appropriate educational learning tools. Although teachers play a crucial role in education, their perceptions attitudes have received little attention. This study explores the of 60 regarding use tools, examines factors influencing relation implementing education. The technological acceptance model technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (CK) (TPACK) framework inform research design, mixed method, combining statistical package Social Science thematic analysis, employed data analysis. reveals that positive usefulness ease tools teaching. paper also embrace an arts‐based approach teaching literacy. qualitative reveal face challenges such as insufficient CK experience with AI; TPACK. five affecting are: (a) teachers' (technological knowledge); (b) technical stakeholder acceptance; (c) attributes tools; (d) school infrastructure budget constraints; (e) potential distraction negative emotional responses. offers insights policymakers professional development initiatives support mechanisms, thereby facilitating more effective implementation.

Язык: Английский

STEAM in practice and research in primary schools: a systematic literature review

Research in Science & Technological Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 25

Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2024

Background STEAM education, which involves integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) with the arts, has gained popularity in recent years. While arts education promote 21st-century skills such as creativity offer new ways of thinking knowing, there is currently a lack empirical guidelines for primary schools to formulate STEAM-based learning content assessment. This makes it challenging educators implement integrated disciplines practice evaluate their educational potential.

Язык: Английский