
Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 11, С. 101252 - 101252
Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024
Язык: Английский
Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 11, С. 101252 - 101252
Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024
Язык: Английский
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 6, 2024
Abstract
Teachers
need
technology-related
knowledge
to
effectively
use
technology
in
the
classroom.
Previous
studies
have
often
used
self-reports
assess
such
knowledge.
However,
it
is
questionable
whether
are
valid
measures
for
this
purpose.
This
study
investigates
how
mathematics
teachers’
correlate
with
their
scores
a
paper–pencil
test
regarding
TPCK
(technological
pedagogical
content
knowledge),
CK
(content
(PCK),
and
technological
(TK).
Participants
were
$$N
=
173$$
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 45(2)
Опубликована: Ноя. 19, 2024
Abstract Digital competence is an increasingly important component of teacher competence. So far, self-reports are a commonly used, efficient, but potentially problematic assessment method. Standardized and valid assessments to measure digital for teachers—particularly concrete subject—and proximally performance lacking. To address this, we developed performance-based pre-service mathematics teachers based on the TPACK DigCompEdu frameworks, both widely used in education. The test focuses related tools such as computer algebra systems, dynamic geometry, spreadsheet software, where technical-mathematical pedagogical competences required. This report presents design provides validity evidence regarding internal structure test, its sensitivity intervention, relation scores external variables, like affective-motivational aspects or prior experiences with study N = 118 teachers. First, confirmed two-dimensional through confirmatory factor analysis. Second, expectations variables were partially confirmed. Third, identified intervention. Especially expected, relations between self-assessment results mixed. Our indicate that suitable measuring teachers’ two close performance. We discuss possible uses evaluate learning opportunities
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Educational Studies in Mathematics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2024
Abstract Teachers need technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for teaching with technology, and its assessment is crucial research practice. Previous literature reviews on TPACK were not specific to a area (e.g., mathematics), although, by definition, the framework includes content-specific facets. Consequently, requirements could differ depending content. Further, reliable of mathematics-specific depends quality test instruments used, but there no consensus type used in past studies. This systematic review adds existing focusing mathematics, investigating study characteristics , instrument operationalizations TPACK. Regarding characteristics, findings reveal an increase number studies conducted across various countries worldwide. As researchers frequently self-developed assess TPACK, often without providing information reliability or validity measures. operationalizations, more than half self-report scales followed observations material analyses, while tests hardly used. Additionally, assessments typically referred domain mathematics as whole instead subdomains mathematics. The results raise questions regarding comparability
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Computers and Education Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 100236 - 100236
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 11, С. 101252 - 101252
Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0