Separation and Purification Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 131123 - 131123
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Separation and Purification Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 131123 - 131123
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Molecular & Cellular Toxicology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 21, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Environmental and Climate Technologies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 29(1), С. 51 - 67
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Abstract Infectious healthcare waste (iHCW), after microbial inactivation treatment, primarily ends up in landfills. Although the morphological composition of iHCW depends on type health facility, predominantly HCW consists plastic and textile waste. Furthermore, treatment is cleaner from a microbiological contamination perspective than household waste, making it highly valuable resource. Recycling has environmental economic benefits by valorising iHCW, would be possible to reduce amount landfilled use as The aim research understand consequences potential treated valorisation scenarios through ‘gate-to-gate’ (from generation at medical facilities end-of-life or recovery) life cycle assessment framework compare with existing practice – landfilling functional unit 1 ton using ReCiPe 2016 (Midpoint, Hierarchist perspective) method. Valorisation (VS) analysed substitute feedstock for reinforced asphalt, cement, RDF, syngas, acoustic panel components used hydroponics. results LCA demonstrate that impact perspective, best are syngas production (VS4) cumulative result −11Pt −237 kg CO 2 eq global warming category RDF (VS3) −5Pt −195 category, entire flow recycled into energy. However, when recycling most product must created, then hydroponics (VS6) 50Pt 1181 asphalt (VS1) 53 Pt 1246 category. From panels (VS5) 55 598 cement (VS2) 603 Therefore, additional scenario was created where plastic, residual streams fully eliminating landfilling. show BAU 75 1509 greatest compared any VS considered this research. Of total impacts, largest caused disposal, followed transport, which similar all due assumptions about distance transported, also scenarios, but bigger difference benefit Based results, recommendations stakeholders developed.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Processes, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 13(4), С. 1139 - 1139
Опубликована: Апрель 10, 2025
Life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the environmental impacts and health risks associated with four thermochemical conversion technologies: incineration, gasification, pyrolytic liquefaction, hydrothermal liquefaction. Results revealed that all processes yielded positive net benefits (3.8–8.2 kg CO2-eq/kg AR reduction), liquefaction exhibiting lowest emissions (GWP-5.71 CO2-eq/kg). However, its widespread application has been hindered by process limitations, enhancing catalytic efficiency identified as a critical area for future research. Incineration ranked second in terms of remains most favorable method according existing studies. In contrast, gasification did not demonstrate significant advantages, primarily due high energy consumption required drying. Consequently, optimizing drying highlighted key focus research efforts. This study provided valuable insights safe disposal resource recovery antibiotic residue.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Journal of Environmental Management, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 384, С. 125519 - 125519
Опубликована: Апрель 29, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Biology and Fertility of Soils, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Окт. 29, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
3Separation and Purification Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 131123 - 131123
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1