Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2024
Язык: Английский
Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2024
Язык: Английский
Nature Human Behaviour, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Сен. 2, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
7Scientific Reports, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(1)
Опубликована: Март 19, 2025
Social media misinformation has become a serious societal problem, and recent research focused on developing effective ways to counter its harmful impacts. This work investigates user-level countermeasures, or how individuals who see the respond it directly, possibly help stop spread in their online communities. Using registered report design, we conducted an survey of 1010 American social users use at least once weekly. Participants were asked they think others should unintentionally post posted by others, responses differ depending relationship with person that misinformation. Overall, results revealed difference between respondents' beliefs actions: participants reported expecting exert more effort when responding than level themselves reported. Additionally, average, likely say intervened was someone close them rather acquaintance stranger. Understanding current behavioral patterns public opinion can inform efforts elicit participation countering increase effectiveness platform-level countermeasures.Protocol registration: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report accepted principle March 13th, 2024. protocol, as journal, be found at: https://figshare.com/s/683b1e7c2f2bad96f604 .
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Опубликована: Ноя. 11, 2023
Warning labels from professional fact-checkers are one of the most widely used interventions against online misinformation. But fact-checker warning effective for those who distrust fact-checkers? In a first correlational study (N=1,000), we validate measure trust in fact-checkers. Next, conduct meta-analyses across 21 experiments (total N=14,133) which participants evaluated true and false news posts were randomized to either see no or on high proportion posts. average at reducing belief (27.6% reduction), sharing (24.7% headlines. While effects smaller with less fact-checkers, nonetheless significantly reduced (12.9% (16.7% even distrusting These results suggest broadly tool combatting
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
8Journal of Health Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Ноя. 28, 2024
The rapid expansion of the Internet and social media has intensified spread health misinformation, posing significant risks, especially for older adults. This meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on prevalence interventions misinformation among Our findings reveal a high rate 47% (95% CI [33%, 60%]), surpassing recent estimates. Offline research settings have higher misinformation. Despite methodological variances, remains consistent across different measures development levels. Interventions show effectiveness (Hedges’ g = 0.76, 95% [0.25, 1.26]), with graphic-based approaches outperforming video-based ones. These results underscore urgent need tailored, large-scale to mitigate adverse impacts Further should focus refining intervention strategies extending studies underrepresented regions populations.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1Telematics and Informatics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 95, С. 102197 - 102197
Опубликована: Окт. 16, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0