AMBIO, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Сен. 24, 2024
Язык: Английский
People and Nature, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 6(3), С. 1355 - 1365
Опубликована: Апрель 29, 2024
Abstract Around the world, people express a variety of values nature based on how they relate and interact with it. These nature, broadly classified as instrumental, intrinsic, relational values, underlie environmental policy decision‐making processes. In this paper, our aim was to assess that are expressed in national documents. We assessed National Biodiversity Strategies Action Plans (NBSAPs), key framework for biodiversity conservation, from 11 countries, representing five regional United Nations groups. used qualitative content analysis identify value orientation statements NBSAPs main themes under each. Across NBSAPs, unspecified were most common (40%), followed by instrumental (38%), intrinsic (14%) (9%) statements. identified follows: (1) sustainability, (2) natural resources (3) ecosystem services. The present recognizing value, endangered species habitats, conservation programmes (4) threats nature. Relational referenced duty responsibility protect pride heritage, Indigenous peoples local community's (IP&LCs) relationships (5) protecting future generations (6) equity use access Our findings indicate respond directive Convention Biological Diversity. They primarily only rarely considering other ways which is valuable people. This can reinforce unjust outcomes human well‐being since policies may not reflect diverse matter population. an increasingly interconnected called incorporate multiple achieve positive both conservation. Read free Plain Language Summary article Journal blog.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
4
Ecosystem Services, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 69, С. 101655 - 101655
Опубликована: Авг. 27, 2024
Ecosystem services justice is an emergent research field.Over the past decade, on ecosystem has increasingly developed a perspective and incorporated it into its conceptual empirical frameworks.This aims at providing review of strands addressing justice, creating outlook future needs frontiers.The departs from central critiques to service approach, which have been foundational for field justice.To be precise, we address three different issues arise.First, production, considering (increasing) commodification services, concentration production assets role trade-offs in capacities.Second, distribution benefits under aspects unequal vulnerabilities, consideration accessibility individual's capabilities obtain services.Third, recognition pluralisms, including socially differentiated forms wellbeing, plural values knowledge concerning services.While ES strongly advanced scientific perspective, are still lacking stronger reflection these advances practice.Future research, argue, develop holistic procedural frameworks integrating complexity historic inequalities, with respect people's diverse needs, capabilities, as well wellbeing-, value-, knowledge-systems.The socialecological understanding co-production, recognizes dynamic reciprocal relationship between humans ecosystems, identified crucial framing this endeavor.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
4
AMBIO, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 13, 2025
Abstract Despite the numerous benefits we derive from ecosystems as ecosystem services (ES), negative impacts on human health and well-being also occur disservices (ED). To study ED, researchers box them into classes create conceptual frameworks to support their identification, assessment, communication. It is unclear what now exist for relative uptake in literature, potential application across socio-ecological contexts. We conduct a systematic literature review of ED classification systems take stock synthesize this growing but scattered body research. find strong several influential articles persisting inconsistency classifications oversimplification processes within frameworks. Aggregating existing frameworks, draw lessons learned propose Composite Ecosystem Disservices (CED) framework. call increased research, greater comparability replicability allowing transdisciplinarity, underpinnings that recognize social-ecological interconnections.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Wildlife Biology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 2024(6)
Опубликована: Июль 22, 2024
This article presents our recent experience studying public perceptions, discourses, and social values in Park Beverin, a Regional Nature Switzerland. We applied four research methods (news media analysis, survey with micro‐narratives, go‐along interviews, focus groups), delved into the subject of wolf Canis lupus adapting triangulation protocol systematic process from health sciences. observed recurring perceptions ‘wolf' throughout three methods; however, depictions, values, prominence, presence varied by method. Social were mostly silent when compared to other topics, ‘wolf amplification' fatigue' point need rethink aspects management, conservation, policy. The findings also show for diverse revealing on sensitive topics that otherwise use one method may be masking or amplifying.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
3
Agriculture and Human Values, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 19, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
People and Nature, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 4, 2025
Abstract Negotiating the many, often conflicting, values of biodiversity held by different stakeholders is a key endeavour in terms integrating into policy, co‐producing sustainable knowledge and achieving solutions. This negotiation affected stakeholders' agonistic identification processes, which they express negative attributions linked to other groups relation nature. Negative are an incremental part processes stabilise defend own nature‐related identity through devaluing relations Although might negatively affect deliberative currently barely recognised value integration research. To address this gap, we carried out interviews with experts context conflict between insect conservation conventional agriculture Germany. We based our study theory analysed using qualitative content analysis focus on how interviewees expressed towards parties. focused articulations utilization wardship human–nature relational models. These cognitive models shape actors' interaction nature as components contribute actors prioritize them differently. found that each model. highlight five most salient ones for data, example ‘picture book nature’, ‘business strategy’ or ‘economic priority’, ‘alienation’, well their relationship positive respective explained. While can have effects such be adapted increase robustness against reactivation processes. Read free Plain Language Summary article Journal blog.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Ecological Economics, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 206, С. 107758 - 107758
Опубликована: Фев. 2, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
7
People and Nature, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 5(5), С. 1526 - 1538
Опубликована: Июль 13, 2023
Abstract In the pathway toward environmental sustainability, it is important that we understand how individuals can make a difference through diverse types of engagement. Theories suggest transformative change sustainable future requires to engage in not only private actions (e.g. household energy saving, recycling) but also social‐signalling and system‐changing civic opinion sharing, voting, petition signing protesting). Yet, past research on pro‐environmental behaviour has primarily focused actions, while overlooking individual contributions facilitating widespread actions. We use exotic pet trade as focal case may act promote sustainability different patterns engagement what factors might explain these distinct patters action. Results from an online survey about behavioural intentions United States ( n = 527) revealed three action could transform trade. Private clustered separately Within category distinction emerged between lower social‐commitment higher based perceived level social personal efforts involved. found each type was associated with unique factors, highlighting importance attitudes, norms, relational values for variously promoting among U.S. public. Our findings should be treated differently when designing wildlife conservation campaigns interventions. Read free Plain Language Summary this article Journal blog.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
6
People and Nature, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 5(6), С. 2026 - 2047
Опубликована: Окт. 17, 2023
Abstract Multiple crises, including climate change, ecosystem degradation, economic, political and social upheavals, severely impact people's well‐being. Ecosystem services (or nature's contributions to people) play a key role during crisis that needs be further elucidated. Most research focusses on the material benefits ecosystems provide in times of crisis, paying less attention intertwined intangible, nonmaterial dimensions. Yet, these intangible are often crucial for resilience well‐being need. We examine nature plays through case study Greece's back‐to‐the‐land movement European economic crisis. conducted semistructured interviews with 76 households had gone understand why people sought reconnect what their experiences were. Our results show reconnecting provided such as food income from previously undervalued (e.g. abandoned orchards) well mental health, feelings safety, calm independence helped cope adapt transform new socio‐ecological contexts. Participants reported also changed relational values. People mentioned gaining perspectives, meanings relationships others natural world. While significantly affected well‐being, but prompted profound reevaluation constitutes good life, leading changes subjective This enhanced capacity act plan future (their agency). Overall, our emphasizes how its multidimensional crises can have transformative effects individuals' resilience, environment. shows not only need valued affect material, dimensions resilience. Read free Plain Language Summary this article Journal blog.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
6
Ecosystems and People, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 20(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 15, 2024
Maintaining a resilient and sustainable agro-production system is replete with challenges, because management practices designed to enhance productivity can overlook the range of values derived from ecosystems concerns about their future. Further complicating decisions being made agricultural settings variation in social-ecological stressors that shape how diverse community members interpret landscape change. We engaged residents Kaskaskia River Watershed Illinois, USA discussions agroecosystems through participatory mapping exercises focus groups. The spatially explicit data were this process then modeled relation changes watershed hydrology simulated using Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. observed four most salient 'values' associated recreation, erosion protection, crop production, flood control. Erosion, siltation sedimentation, increased flooding, invasive species considered relevant 'disvalues' they represented greatest concern. Respondents believed more clustered than disvalues, main river corridor was at greater risk degradation tributaries despite these second order streams biologically diverse. use coupled SWAT simulate systemic responses provided basis for identifying high low-priority locations regional scale. Our results therefore aim spatial prioritize guide evidence-based anchored social ecological complexities Midwestern watershed.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2