Understanding the values that inform regenerative ranching in the Northern U.S. Great Plains DOI Creative Commons
Timothy Pape, Gwendŵr R. Meredith,

David Sandahl

и другие.

Agriculture and Human Values, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 13, 2024

Abstract The effects of environmental degradation and climate change are propelling a discourse shift towards regenerative agriculture, yet understanding motivations for implementing practices on private agricultural lands is still challenge. We study that challenge within the realm ranching, subcategory agriculture. By examining frequency values articulated by respondents, valuation typology stemming from 24 semi-structured interviews with ranchers in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota revealed. Instrumental valuations dominated studied region connection to ranching practices, although some respondents relational intrinsic tied their practices. While this focuses we posit better interplay between diverse as they relate land management vital promoting more resilient thoughtful ecosystem governance.

Язык: Английский

An inclusive typology of values for navigating transformations towards a just and sustainable future DOI Creative Commons
Christopher M. Raymond, Christopher B. Anderson, Simone Athayde

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101301 - 101301

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

Achieving the intertwined goals of justice and sustainability requires transformative changes to meaningfully engage diverse perspectives. Therefore, scholars policymakers need new ways recognising addressing nature's multiple values across cultures, disciplines other knowledge traditions. By reviewing academic publications, policy documents Indigenous local community sources, we developed an inclusive typology clarify value concepts guide their consideration in decisions. Through case studies, illustrate how navigating 'horizontal' 'vertical' interactions within this can help confront plural-value challenges, such as enhancing participation environmental research practice, effective management socio-environmental conflicts. We conclude by exploring further leverage change decision-making contexts.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

48

Editorial overview: Leveraging the multiple values of nature for transformative change to just and sustainable futures — Insights from the IPBES Values Assessment DOI Open Access
Unai Pascual, Patricia Balvanera, Mike Christie

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101359 - 101359

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

24

The role of value(s) in theories of human behavior DOI
Rachelle K. Gould, Thais Moreno Soares, Paola Arias‐Arévalo

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101355 - 101355

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

24

Whose conservation, revisited: how a focus on people–nature relationships spotlights new directions for conservation science DOI Creative Commons
Belinda Reyers, Elena M. Bennett

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 380(1917)

Опубликована: Янв. 9, 2025

Georgina Mace introduced a compelling perspective on the major shifts in conservation science’s framing and purpose from 1960 to 2010. A decade ago, she proposed that community had begun move into new of ‘people nature’ based changes perspectives relationships between people nature interdisciplinary concepts methods used conservation. Progress using this frame is clear as ‘two-way dynamic have since taken centre stage science, practice policy. Now, responding concerns raised current approaches are still not meeting scale complexity challenges Anthropocene, we explore newly emerging with nature’—an inextricably intertwined people–nature relationships. This builds Mace’s recognition interconnections change, well directions offered by conservation’s recent transdisciplinary engagements, go beyond notion two-way flows connecting emphasize inseparability nature’. suggests for science make visible, improve reimagine degraded needed bend curve biodiversity loss. article part discussion issue ‘Bending towards recovery: building Mace's legacy biodiverse future’.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Toward an intersectional equity approach in social–ecological transformations DOI Creative Commons
Paula Andrea Sánchez García, Krisztina Jónás, Kara E. Pellowe

и другие.

Global Sustainability, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 8

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Abstract Non-technical summary Ensuring more equitable transformations requires addressing how different contextual dimensions of identity, such as gender and class, hinder equity. However, previous analyses on equity have addressed these separately. We suggest advancing beyond methods by integrating intersectional analysis into the distributive, procedural, recognition aspects when examining social–ecological transformations. A review 37 studies transformation shows that scholars commonly social, spatial, environmental In contrast, few gone depth in analyzing reasons for power imbalances. encourage to use critical questions reflect collectively. Technical involves understanding identity – gender, age, class affect experiences path sustainability. Previous often focused one dimension difference, but an intersectionality framework is essential recognizing interconnected identities. this paper, we empirical transformations, identifying key assets transformation, including economic, cultural, political, environmental, knowledge-based assets. apply analytical based equity, incorporating analysis, which examines dynamics contribute inequities distribution, procedure, recognition. Our findings show are most frequently mentioned our sampled literature, together with benefits, costs, inclusiveness, knowledge dimensions. Power imbalances occurred often, while were only two-thirds studies. believe approach will help better conceptualize concerning (in)equity. Based reflections, encouraging evaluate them iteratively interdisciplinary group. Social media An just why.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Sustainable finance, biodiversity, and greenwashing: how contested values, metrics, and causation facilitate information distortion, information omission, and information pollution DOI
Job de Grefte, Boudewijn de Bruin

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 74, С. 101522 - 101522

Опубликована: Март 25, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Transformation for inclusive conservation: evidence on values, decisions, and impacts in protected areas DOI
Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Rachel Neugarten, David Gonzalez-Jimenez

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101347 - 101347

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

19

Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice DOI Creative Commons
Marije Schaafsma,

Seongho Ahn,

Antonio Arjona Castro

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101350 - 101350

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods approaches exist to assess diverse value types. evidence is based largest review academic studies nature date, developed for (IPBES). We evaluate according environmental justice criteria. results suggest although types indicators are assessed across studies, few individual plural, fail provide distributive score low procedural indicators. a set recommendations incorporating issues in design studies.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

18

Embedding local values in Payments for Ecosystem Services for transformative change DOI
Leah L. Bremer, Sara Nelson, Sue Jackson

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101354 - 101354

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

15

Plural values of nature help to understand contested pathways to sustainability DOI Creative Commons
Adrian Martin, Erik Gómez‐Baggethun, Martin F. Quaas

и другие.

One Earth, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 7(5), С. 806 - 819

Опубликована: Май 1, 2024

Despite globally agreed sustainability goals, advocacy for specific pathways of action remains highly contested. Disagreement about how best to advance can produce constructive debate but also lead marginalization, conflict, and inaction. This review uncovers different "values nature" underpin allegiance sustainability. It analyzes four selected pathways: (1) Green Economy, (2) Nature Protection, (3) Earth Stewardship Biocultural Diversity, (4) Degrowth Post-Growth. We identify these diverge in the values they prioritize are inseparable from kind knowledge solutions advocate resolve environmental crises. The reveals underlying that differentiate (and connect) competing argues transparency reflection on differences is a step toward more use diversity. Looking forward, we promising directions involving deliberative governance, institutional reforms, disruption dominance.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6