Nature Without the State: An Anarchist Critique of ‘Animalistic Evil’ DOI Creative Commons
Jason K. Day

Studia z Historii Filozofii, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 13(3), С. 63 - 79

Опубликована: Дек. 19, 2022

I here present an anarchist critique of the idea ‘animalistic evil’ and its common use as a justification for State’s existence force. On this view, ‘evil’ is privation morality, justice, civilised behaviour. It then identified with ‘animalistic’ since animals are often thought to be defined by aforesaid privation. first clarify animalistic evil within history philosophy science. Aristotle (384–322 BCE), Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), H. Huxley (1825–1895) prominently argue that all prevents humanity from devolving into evil, state violent individualistic struggle bare survival, power State government forcibly control drives citizens. subsequently pose two questions. (1) Is it justified associate animal life when (a) understood justice society (b) characterised survival? (2) If not justified, what political harm doing so? Building on work thinker Peter Kropotkin (1842–1921), any conception unjustifiable, false force, State, upon making empty threat both violently harms individuals impedes socially beneficial practice mutual aid.

Язык: Английский

Peer Review #4 of "When aggressiveness could be too risky: linking personality traits and predator response in superb fairy-wrens (v0.2)" DOI Creative Commons

A Robinson

Опубликована: Сен. 28, 2022

Personality syndromes in animals may have adaptive benefits for survival.For example, while engaging predator deterrence, reactive individuals tend to prioritise their own survival, proactive engage riskier behaviours.Studies linking animal personality measured captivity with individual fitness or behaviours the wild are sparse, which is a gap knowledge this study aims address.We used playback experiments superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus), common Australian songbird cooperative breeding system, assess whether three traits during short-term correlated behavioural responses perceived nest and adult predator, grey currawong (Strepera versicolor).We standard measures of birds: struggle human handling (boldness), exploration novel environment test, aggressiveness mirror presentation.Superb showed significantly stronger response than control (willie wagtail, Rhipidura leucophyrys) playback, suggesting that they recognised as threat without any accompanying visual stimulus.Birds attacked image presentation those spent moderate amount time close responded more strongly (by approaching speaker faster closer, spending near speaker, being likely alarm call) compared low very short long durations mirror.Neither boldness nor test predicted response.Our results align growing number studies across species showing importance personalities factors survival.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Peer Review #1 of "When aggressiveness could be too risky: linking personality traits and predator response in superb fairy-wrens (v0.2)" DOI Creative Commons
Jack Bilby, Diane Colombelli‐Négrel, Andrew C. Katsis

и другие.

Опубликована: Сен. 28, 2022

Personality syndromes in animals may have adaptive benefits for survival.For example, while engaging predator deterrence, reactive individuals tend to prioritise their own survival, proactive engage riskier behaviours.Studies linking animal personality measured captivity with individual fitness or behaviours the wild are sparse, which is a gap knowledge this study aims address.We used playback experiments superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus), common Australian songbird cooperative breeding system, assess whether three traits during short-term correlated behavioural responses perceived nest and adult predator, grey currawong (Strepera versicolor).We standard measures of birds: struggle human handling (boldness), exploration novel environment test, aggressiveness mirror presentation.Superb showed significantly stronger response than control (willie wagtail, Rhipidura leucophyrys) playback, suggesting that they recognised as threat without any accompanying visual stimulus.Birds attacked image presentation those spent moderate amount time close responded more strongly (by approaching speaker faster closer, spending near speaker, being likely alarm call) compared low very short long durations mirror.Neither boldness nor test predicted response.Our results align growing number studies across species showing importance personalities factors survival.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Peer Review #2 of "When aggressiveness could be too risky: linking personality traits and predator response in superb fairy-wrens (v0.1)" DOI Creative Commons
Jack Bilby, Diane Colombelli‐Négrel, Andrew C. Katsis

и другие.

Опубликована: Сен. 28, 2022

Personality syndromes in animals may have adaptive benefits for survival.For example, while engaging predator deterrence, reactive individuals tend to prioritise their own survival, proactive engage riskier behaviours.Studies linking animal personality measured captivity with individual fitness or behaviours the wild are sparse, which is a gap knowledge this study aims address.We used playback experiments superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus), common Australian songbird cooperative breeding system, assess whether three traits during short-term correlated behavioural responses perceived nest and adult predator, grey currawong (Strepera versicolor).We standard measures of birds: struggle human handling (boldness), exploration novel environment test, aggressiveness mirror presentation.Superb showed significantly stronger response than control (willie wagtail, Rhipidura leucophyrys) playback, suggesting that they recognised as threat without any accompanying visual stimulus.Birds attacked image presentation those spent moderate amount time close responded more strongly (by approaching speaker faster closer, spending near speaker, being likely alarm call) compared low very short long durations mirror.Neither boldness nor test predicted response.Our results align growing number studies across species showing importance personalities factors survival.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Peer Review #1 of "When aggressiveness could be too risky: linking personality traits and predator response in superb fairy-wrens (v0.1)" DOI Creative Commons
Jack Bilby, Diane Colombelli‐Négrel, Andrew C. Katsis

и другие.

Опубликована: Сен. 28, 2022

Personality syndromes in animals may have adaptive benefits for survival.For example, while engaging predator deterrence, reactive individuals tend to prioritise their own survival, proactive engage riskier behaviours.Studies linking animal personality measured captivity with individual fitness or behaviours the wild are sparse, which is a gap knowledge this study aims address.We used playback experiments superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus), common Australian songbird cooperative breeding system, assess whether three traits during short-term correlated behavioural responses perceived nest and adult predator, grey currawong (Strepera versicolor).We standard measures of birds: struggle human handling (boldness), exploration novel environment test, aggressiveness mirror presentation.Superb showed significantly stronger response than control (willie wagtail, Rhipidura leucophyrys) playback, suggesting that they recognised as threat without any accompanying visual stimulus.Birds attacked image presentation those spent moderate amount time close responded more strongly (by approaching speaker faster closer, spending near speaker, being likely alarm call) compared low very short long durations mirror.Neither boldness nor test predicted response.Our results align growing number studies across species showing importance personalities factors survival.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Nature Without the State: An Anarchist Critique of ‘Animalistic Evil’ DOI Creative Commons
Jason K. Day

Studia z Historii Filozofii, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 13(3), С. 63 - 79

Опубликована: Дек. 19, 2022

I here present an anarchist critique of the idea ‘animalistic evil’ and its common use as a justification for State’s existence force. On this view, ‘evil’ is privation morality, justice, civilised behaviour. It then identified with ‘animalistic’ since animals are often thought to be defined by aforesaid privation. first clarify animalistic evil within history philosophy science. Aristotle (384–322 BCE), Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), H. Huxley (1825–1895) prominently argue that all prevents humanity from devolving into evil, state violent individualistic struggle bare survival, power State government forcibly control drives citizens. subsequently pose two questions. (1) Is it justified associate animal life when (a) understood justice society (b) characterised survival? (2) If not justified, what political harm doing so? Building on work thinker Peter Kropotkin (1842–1921), any conception unjustifiable, false force, State, upon making empty threat both violently harms individuals impedes socially beneficial practice mutual aid.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0