Tradeoffs among ecosystem services under ecological engineering construction: Donor and receiver evaluation of 25 soil and water conservation projects in China DOI

Yuanxiang Yang,

Lang Huang,

Shihuai Deng

и другие.

Ecological Engineering, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 219, С. 107685 - 107685

Опубликована: Май 28, 2025

Язык: Английский

Enhancing ecological sustainability in ion-adsorption rare earth mining areas: A multi-scale model for assessing spatiotemporal dynamics and ecological resilience DOI

Yaoyao Jiang,

Hengkai Li, Zhiwei Zhang

и другие.

Ecological Modelling, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 502, С. 111038 - 111038

Опубликована: Фев. 8, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Success Indicators of Progressive Ecological Rehabilitation of Sites around a Tropical Highland Open Pit Mine DOI Open Access

Lefranc Busane Basima,

Jean-Berckmans Muhigwa,

Alfred Kabagale Cubaka

и другие.

Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 13(04), С. 415 - 454

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

On the Ecological Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Under the “Separation of Three Rights”: From the Perspective of Contract Rights DOI Creative Commons
Nan Wang,

Kaisheng Long,

Wenke Liu

и другие.

Land, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14(5), С. 1003 - 1003

Опубликована: Май 6, 2025

Contracting farmers are the main entities in cultivated land protection. From perspective of contractual rights, improving ecological compensation standards for under “Separation Three Rights” system helps coordinate interest relationships and serves as key to benefit distribution among multiple right-holders. Reasonable contracting facilitates dual consideration food security safety land. The study starts from connotation incorporates both opportunity cost losses values into criteria based on membership attributes rights nature use rights. Employing equivalent factor method, replacement it calculates transferred non-transferred farmers, using prefecture-level cities Jiangsu Province case examples. (1) Land-transferring contracted farmers: standard is calculated loss basis. (2) Non-transferring value generated through agricultural production. Research Findings: average farmland transfer 6275.79 CNY/hm2, primarily implemented government mechanisms. 40,604 a government–market–community collaborative mechanism. tiered criteria, by accounting differential contributions participants non-participants agro-ecosystem services, effectively reconcile imperatives arable preservation livelihood enhancement farmers.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Tradeoffs among ecosystem services under ecological engineering construction: Donor and receiver evaluation of 25 soil and water conservation projects in China DOI

Yuanxiang Yang,

Lang Huang,

Shihuai Deng

и другие.

Ecological Engineering, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 219, С. 107685 - 107685

Опубликована: Май 28, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0