Ecosystem services in environmental policy: Barriers and opportunities for increased adoption DOI
Rodney J. Keenan,

Greg Pozza,

James Fitzsimons

и другие.

Ecosystem Services, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 38, С. 100943 - 100943

Опубликована: Июнь 25, 2019

Язык: Английский

When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning DOI Creative Commons
Francis Turkelboom, Michael Leone, Sander Jacobs

и другие.

Ecosystem Services, Год журнала: 2017, Номер 29, С. 566 - 578

Опубликована: Ноя. 27, 2017

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

300

Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach DOI
Paula A. Harrison, R. W. Dunford, David N. Barton

и другие.

Ecosystem Services, Год журнала: 2017, Номер 29, С. 481 - 498

Опубликована: Окт. 23, 2017

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

216

Organic and conservation agriculture promote ecosystem multifunctionality DOI Creative Commons
Raphaël Wittwer, S. Franz Bender, Kyle Hartman

и другие.

Science Advances, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 7(34)

Опубликована: Авг. 20, 2021

Considering agroecosystem multifunctionality is essential for designing sustainable cropping systems.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

204

A performance-based planning approach integrating supply and demand of urban ecosystem services DOI Creative Commons
Chiara Cortinovis, Davide Geneletti

Landscape and Urban Planning, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 201, С. 103842 - 103842

Опубликована: Май 15, 2020

Performance-based planning is advocated as a promising alternative to more common prescriptive approaches (e.g., traditional zoning), manage the complexity of current urban development in flexible and effective way. The aim this paper develop test an innovative performance-based approach built around assessment ecosystem service supply demand. moves from overall objective enhancing provision relevant services city. Accordingly, proposed transformations are subject performance aimed at limiting negative impact on promoting integration ecosystem-based actions. loss defines required level performance, while type (i.e. what should be targeted) depends To support implementation approach, we developed two operational tools: "combined ES supply" map "integrated demand" map. A scoring system links indicators maps assesses balance between positive impacts. tested city Trento, Italy, considering seven three different types transformations. application reveals strengths limitations, offers proof-of-concept that can further refined adapted other contexts. study demonstrates how assessments design technical policy instruments, thus contributing filling blindspot roles knowledge decision-making processes.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

128

Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational DOI
Kurt Jax, Eeva Furman, Heli Saarikoski

и другие.

Ecosystem Services, Год журнала: 2017, Номер 29, С. 415 - 427

Опубликована: Дек. 9, 2017

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

110

Integrating green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning. Results from two Finnish case studies DOI
Mina Di Marino, Maija Tiitu, Kimmo Lapintie

и другие.

Land Use Policy, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 82, С. 643 - 656

Опубликована: Янв. 15, 2019

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

105

Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners DOI
Angélica Valencia Torres, Chetan Tiwari, Samuel F. Atkinson

и другие.

Ecosystem Services, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 49, С. 101267 - 101267

Опубликована: Апрель 15, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

91

Practical applications of ecosystem services in spatial planning: Lessons learned from a systematic literature review DOI Creative Commons
Davide Longato, Chiara Cortinovis, Christian Albert

и другие.

Environmental Science & Policy, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 119, С. 72 - 84

Опубликована: Фев. 26, 2021

The integration of ecosystem service (ES) knowledge into decision-making processes is increasingly endorsed by various policies and initiatives, with spatial planning targeted as one the most relevant fields. Learning feeding back from existing experiences therefore a fundamental step to ensure appropriate useful support ES science. This paper aims gather critically analyse how science contributes practices. Through systematic review literature about use in planning, we map level knowledge, scale case studies, type addressed; identify studies real-world applications. Studies explicitly aimed at supporting have increased over last decade, but are still scarce. reveal advantages integrating processes, mainly concerning practical aspects such synthesizing complex socio-environmental information promoting participation. Windows opportunity offered regulatory frameworks innovative instruments, marine plans strategic environmental assessments, key factors triggering integration. However, supportive contextual conditions necessary, including science-policy collaborations across entire process awareness among policy-makers stakeholders.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

83

Ecosystem services-based decision-making: A bridge from science to practice DOI
Zihan Xu, Jian Peng

Environmental Science & Policy, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 135, С. 6 - 15

Опубликована: Май 2, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

62

Recognizing ecosystem service's contribution to SDGs: Ecological foundation of sustainable development DOI Creative Commons
Zihan Xu, Jian Peng

Geography and sustainability, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 5(4), С. 511 - 525

Опубликована: Май 16, 2024

There is less than half the time left to achieve United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and progress toward SDGs obviously insufficient. The contribution of ecosystem services (ES) realization has received extensive attention, but systematic generalization recognition are still lacking. Based on a review challenge sustainable development, this study summarized ES's potential 17 SDGs, systematically reviewed empirical researches focused based RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES). results found that from 1960s 2020s, gradually become more important in development. ES all different varies. In study, SDG2, SDG6, SDG13, SDG15 were strongly focused. SDG4, SDG5, SDG10, SDG16, SDG17 weakly Most explored supply at single scale, with lacked attention demand scale differences, insufficient intervention factors affecting SDGs. Faced above deficiencies, future research could deepen exploration following four perspectives: clarifying true contributions, exploring leverage point, integrating multi-scale focusing factors.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

11