How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries DOI Creative Commons
Nicholas Apergis, Mehmet Pinar, Emre Unlu

и другие.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 30(6), С. 14680 - 14692

Опубликована: Сен. 26, 2022

Abstract Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from developed to developing countries may increase carbon emissions in as are seen pollution havens due their lenient environmental regulations. On the other hand, FDI world improve management practices and advanced technologies countries, an reduces emissions. Most of existing studies examine relationship between by using aggregate flows; however, this paper contributes literature analyzing impact on Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) 1993 2012 bilateral eleven OECD countries. According our empirical results, which country BRICS matters for Our results confirm that Denmark UK confirming haven hypothesis. France, Germany, Italy reduced halo effect. Austria, Finland, Japan, Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland have no significant The should promote clean reducing damages, investing be rated based damage host

Язык: Английский

Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist? DOI
Atif Jahanger, Mohammad Razib Hossain, Muhammad Usman

и другие.

Resources Policy, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 81, С. 103382 - 103382

Опубликована: Фев. 21, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

103

Do globalization and nuclear energy intensify the environmental costs in top nuclear energy-consuming countries? DOI
Muhammad Sadiq, Riazullah Shinwari, Fenghua Wen

и другие.

Progress in Nuclear Energy, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 156, С. 104533 - 104533

Опубликована: Дек. 15, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

102

Do Institutional Quality, Financial Development, and Economic Growth Improve Renewable Energy Transition? Some Evidence from Tunisia DOI
Haifa Saadaoui,

Nouri Chtourou

Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 14(3), С. 2927 - 2958

Опубликована: Март 12, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

101

The impact of economic uncertainty, economic growth and energy consumption on environmental degradation in MENA countries: Fresh insights from multiple thresholds NARDL approach DOI Open Access
Hicham Ayad, S Hassoun, Muhammad Usman

и другие.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 30(1), С. 1806 - 1824

Опубликована: Авг. 3, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

100

How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries DOI Creative Commons
Nicholas Apergis, Mehmet Pinar, Emre Unlu

и другие.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 30(6), С. 14680 - 14692

Опубликована: Сен. 26, 2022

Abstract Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from developed to developing countries may increase carbon emissions in as are seen pollution havens due their lenient environmental regulations. On the other hand, FDI world improve management practices and advanced technologies countries, an reduces emissions. Most of existing studies examine relationship between by using aggregate flows; however, this paper contributes literature analyzing impact on Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) 1993 2012 bilateral eleven OECD countries. According our empirical results, which country BRICS matters for Our results confirm that Denmark UK confirming haven hypothesis. France, Germany, Italy reduced halo effect. Austria, Finland, Japan, Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland have no significant The should promote clean reducing damages, investing be rated based damage host

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

99