Research Square (Research Square),
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 8, 2024
Abstract
Background
The
Arab
world
is
one
of
the
global
regions
most
directly
concerned
by,
and
suffering
from
climate
change’s
adverse
consequences.
As
such,
there
appears
to
be
a
strong
need
for
an
understanding
how
people
may
emotionally
respond
change.
Providing
valid
reliable
measures
change
anxiety
(CCA)
can
help
gain
clear
overview
situation
in
countries,
allow
intervene
timely
effectively
mitigate
any
effects
on
people’s
mental
health.
To
this
end,
present
study
sought
validate
Arabic
language
version
Climate
Change
Anxiety
Scale
(CCAS)
sample
native
Arabic-speaking
adults
general
population
Lebanon.
Methods
This
adopted
cross-sectional
approach
enrolled
763
between
July
September
2023.
Results
A
confirmatory
analysis
one-factor
model
showed
poor
fit
indices
as
follows:
CFI
=
.90,
GFI
.83,
SRMR
.048
RMSEA
.131
[90%
CI
.123,
.138).
two-factor
satisfactory
with
high
0.91
0.04
0.05
0.04,
0.06].
Both
McDonald’s
omega
Cronbach
alpha
values
were
overall
CCAS
score
(α
.96
ω
.96)
whole
sample.
Configural,
metric
scalar
invariance
across
gender
was
demonstrated.
No
significant
difference
found
males
females
terms
total
scores
(24.53
±
10.59
vs
26.03
11.17,
t(761)
-1.82,
p
.069).
Higher
CCA,
functional
impairment
cognitive
significantly
associated
higher
depression,
stress.
Conclusion
reliability
validity
its
proven.
availability
self-report
measure
could
offer
chance
assess
CCA
among
Adults
speaking
Arabic,
spread
future
use
screening
research
purposes.
The Journal of Climate Change and Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
9, С. 100186 - 100186
Опубликована: Ноя. 4, 2022
Climate
change
affects
both
mental
and
physical
health.
Besides
limiting
the
extent
consequences
of
climate
change,
mitigation
adaptation
measures
can
have
additional
potentially
unintended
health
impacts.
This
scoping
review
outlines
how
effects
been
studied
in
scientific
literature.
We
conducted
a
systematic
literature
search
databases
PubMed,
Scopus
Web
Science
without
time
restriction.
All
peer-reviewed
articles
reporting
quantified
impacts
linked
to
specific
were
included.
Overall,
89
included
considered
only
narrow
range
determinants
outcomes.
Adaptation-
mitigation-related
most
frequently
investigated
environmental
air
temperature
pollution,
respectively.
Non-communicable
diseases
predominantly
while
other
relevant
outcome
categories,
such
as
health,
food-
nutrition-related
issues,
communicable
rarely
reported.
The
scarcity
studies
focusing
on
social
providing
stratified
among
vulnerable
population
groups
assessments
points
an
inadequate
consideration
equity
aspects.
Increased
efforts
quantify
more
comprehensively
identify
underlying
vulnerability
factors
seem
needed.
information
could
provide
policymakers
with
accurate
evidence
address
aspects,
limit
adverse
promote
co-benefits
measures.
Climate
anxiety
refers
to
the
negative
emotional
reactions
that
a
person
can
experience
in
response
climate
change
irrespective
of
prior
direct
with
it.
Research
suggests
this
reaction
ranges
from
successful
coping
and
adaptation
clinical-level
psychological
impairment.
The
Change
Anxiety
Scale
(CCAS)
was
designed
measure
person’s
level
However,
inconsistent
results
when
testing
relationship
between
CCAS
scores
wellbeing
measures
have
raised
questions
about
scale’s
validity
usefulness
for
assessing
change’s
mental
health
impacts.
Our
goal
quantitatively
direction
strength
correlations
(as
indexed
by
CCAS)
wellbeing.
We
identified
25
studies
60
effect
sizes
inclusion,
meta-analytic
indicated
strong
correlation
overall
(r
=
-.296,
95%
CI
[-.360;
-.230],
p
<
.001).
estimates
were
consistent
across
subscales
diagnosis-specific
Multilevel
meta-regressions
used
estimate
influence
potential
moderators
stronger
sample’s
mean
environmental
identity
higher,
indicative
unwellness
used.
discuss
implications
nature
general,
use
clinical
broader
contexts.
Environment International,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
183, С. 108413 - 108413
Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2023
With
climate
change
Northern
areas
of
the
globe
are
expected
to
have
less
daylight
during
winters
due
snow
and
more
cloudiness.
While
wintertime
has
been
linked
mental
health
problems,
role
scarcely
studied.
We
examined
longitudinal
associations
for
objective
exposure
global
radiation
self-reported
with
symptoms
depression
sleep
problems.
Our
analytical
sample
included
15,619
respondents
from
three
Swedish
Longitudinal
Occupational
Surveys
Health
(2012,
2014
2016).
Objective
was
(MJ/m2,
November-January
November-February).
Subjective
based
on
time
outdoors
in
(<1
hour
vs.
≥1
hour,
November-January).
Symptoms
were
evaluated
using
a
six-item
subscale
(Hopkins)
Symptom
Checklist.
Fixed-effects
method
conditional
logistic
regression
controlled
time-invariant
participant
characteristics
by
design
time-varying
covariates
added
into
models.
One
unit
increase
four-month
averaged
associated
lower
odds
depressive
(OR
0.69,
95%
CI
0.52-0.91).
These
findings
confirmed
cumulative
0.91,
0.85-0.98).
Individuals
reporting
winter
months
likely
report
0.72,
0.60-0.82)
compared
when
their
<1
hour.
Higher
three-month
suggested
protective
association
suggest
that
higher
may
contribute
likelihood
symptoms.
Research Square (Research Square),
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 8, 2024
Abstract
Background
The
Arab
world
is
one
of
the
global
regions
most
directly
concerned
by,
and
suffering
from
climate
change’s
adverse
consequences.
As
such,
there
appears
to
be
a
strong
need
for
an
understanding
how
people
may
emotionally
respond
change.
Providing
valid
reliable
measures
change
anxiety
(CCA)
can
help
gain
clear
overview
situation
in
countries,
allow
intervene
timely
effectively
mitigate
any
effects
on
people’s
mental
health.
To
this
end,
present
study
sought
validate
Arabic
language
version
Climate
Change
Anxiety
Scale
(CCAS)
sample
native
Arabic-speaking
adults
general
population
Lebanon.
Methods
This
adopted
cross-sectional
approach
enrolled
763
between
July
September
2023.
Results
A
confirmatory
analysis
one-factor
model
showed
poor
fit
indices
as
follows:
CFI
=
.90,
GFI
.83,
SRMR
.048
RMSEA
.131
[90%
CI
.123,
.138).
two-factor
satisfactory
with
high
0.91
0.04
0.05
0.04,
0.06].
Both
McDonald’s
omega
Cronbach
alpha
values
were
overall
CCAS
score
(α
.96
ω
.96)
whole
sample.
Configural,
metric
scalar
invariance
across
gender
was
demonstrated.
No
significant
difference
found
males
females
terms
total
scores
(24.53
±
10.59
vs
26.03
11.17,
t(761)
-1.82,
p
.069).
Higher
CCA,
functional
impairment
cognitive
significantly
associated
higher
depression,
stress.
Conclusion
reliability
validity
its
proven.
availability
self-report
measure
could
offer
chance
assess
CCA
among
Adults
speaking
Arabic,
spread
future
use
screening
research
purposes.