A decision-making algorithm with circular complex intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application in cognitive wireless communications DOI Creative Commons
Harish Garg, Zeeshan Ali, Walid Emam

и другие.

Alexandria Engineering Journal, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

A novel intuitionistic fuzzy best-worst method for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations DOI
Shu‐Ping Wan, Jiu-Ying Dong, Shyi‐Ming Chen

и другие.

Information Sciences, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 666, С. 120404 - 120404

Опубликована: Март 5, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

41

Inaccuracies in Expert Judgment: Comparative Analysis of RANCOM and AHP Methods in Housing Location Selection Problem DOI Creative Commons
Jakub Więckowski, Jarosław Wątróbski, Wojciech Sałabun

и другие.

IEEE Access, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12, С. 142083 - 142100

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

10

Integrating the group-based fuzzy best-worst method and fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution for selecting contractors for heritage building renovation projects DOI

LiuMing Long

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 142, С. 109928 - 109928

Опубликована: Янв. 5, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Partitioned Hamy mean aggregation for multi-criteria group decision-making in the MAIRCA framework with $${\textsf {q}}$$-rung orthopair fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic information DOI
Fatima Abbas, Jawad Ali, Wali Khan Mashwani

и другие.

Granular Computing, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 9(3)

Опубликована: Май 21, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Application of Z-number based fuzzy MCDM in solar power plant location selection problem in Spatial planning DOI Creative Commons
Ömer Ünsal, Gülay Demir, Can Bülent Karakuş

и другие.

Energy Reports, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12, С. 4034 - 4054

Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Advancing Urban Healthcare Equity Analysis: Integrating Public Participation GIS with Fuzzy Best–Worst Decision-Making DOI Open Access

Zeinab Neisani Samani,

Ali Asghar Alesheikh, Mohammad Karimi

и другие.

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 16(5), С. 1745 - 1745

Опубликована: Фев. 20, 2024

This study provides an innovative collaborative spatial decision support system (SDSS) that aims to ensure equitable distribution of healthcare services. Evaluating the equality access health services across different geographical areas is important, as it requires analysis various criteria such proximity centres and hospitals (HCHs), quality offered, connectivity primary roads, availability public transportation hubs, density patterns HCHs. purpose accomplished via use geographic information systems (GIS) multi-criteria (MCDA) methods. The proposed model includes weights criteria, which are determined through ordered weighted average (OWA) evaluated based on their ORness, ranges from 0 1. Furthermore, this improved by best–worst fuzzy method (F-BWM). approach produces a map clearly shows equity in urban environments. findings show maximum score observed was 0.38% (with ORness value 1), whilst minimum recorded 0.28%. In most severe scenario (ORness = 0), over 70% region degrees fairness, ranging moderate suitable very conditions. Governments authorities can strategically allocate resources address inequities facilities.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5

An α-cut intervals based Fuzzy Best–Worst Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making DOI

Harshit Ratandhara,

Mohit Kumar

Applied Soft Computing, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 159, С. 111625 - 111625

Опубликована: Апрель 21, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

The intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic assessment of forest soil quality with multi-granularity qualitative information DOI
Junzhe Zhang, Tao Wu, Jian Lin

и другие.

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 197(2)

Опубликована: Янв. 31, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Evaluating Energy Management Investments for Sustainable Transition of Smart Cities through a New Intuitionistic Fuzzy Consensus-based CoCoSo Methodology DOI
Fatih Ecer, Abhijit Saha, Hasan Dınçer

и другие.

Renewable Energy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 122655 - 122655

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Research on power purchase risk measurement and grading evaluation of grid enterprises based on improved BWM–Cloud model under agency mode DOI Creative Commons

Qian Huang,

Ming Jiang,

Mingde Bi

и другие.

International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 20, С. 568 - 579

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Abstract Grid enterprises need to assess the risk caused by multiple uncertainties such as market trading volume and price fluctuations when acting a proxy for customers purchase electricity in multitimescale markets. To this end, paper constructs measurement grading evaluation model power grid agency purchase. First of all, multidimensional risks corresponding uncertainty factors agent participation transactions are analyzed. Based on this, three-dimensional multilevel system is established evaluate Then, values three-level indicators calculated metric method input standardized into constructed improved Best–Worst Method–Cloud (BWM–Cloud) indicators. Finally, simulation analysis carried out through actual data agents province A China. The results show that can effectively measure provide management references subsequent business companies.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0