Revisiting the bounded generalized reciprocity model: Ingroup favoritism and concerns about negative evaluation DOI Open Access
Yutaka Horita,

Shun Hamada

Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2023

The bounded generalized reciprocity (BGR) model, grounded in reputation management, predicts that the motivation underlying ingroup favoritism (favoring one’s own group over other groups) is driven by avoiding a negative within group. This research conducted two economic games with minimal groups which reputational concerns (partners’ knowledge of participants’ membership) were manipulated. We aimed to verify replicability experimental results support BGR model. A study (N = 394) using dictator game (in participants unilaterally determined their partners’ payoffs) indicated following: (1) more likely behave cooperatively partners than outgroup partners, regardless whether knew membership; and (2) individual differences fear evaluation others not associated cooperation toward ingroup. Similar found another 429) prisoner’s dilemma payoffs partners). However, while sharing about membership facilitated game, no such tendency was observed game. These findings suggest bad may play relatively important role favoritism, generosity members influenced presence or absence interdependence (i.e., partner’s behavior affects participant’s payoffs). proposes reconsideration motivations behind between groups.

Язык: Английский

The impact of group membership on punishment versus partner rejection DOI Creative Commons
Trystan Loustau,

Jacob Glassman,

Justin W. Martin

и другие.

Scientific Reports, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(1)

Опубликована: Сен. 27, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

Introduction to the special issue on gossip and group processes DOI
Bianca Beersma, Kim Peters, Daniel Balliet

и другие.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 104733 - 104733

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Understanding the impact of informative contact in Pay-What-You-Want pricing: a sequential mediation analysis DOI Creative Commons
Oktay Güzel, Emili Vizuete–Luciano

Cogent Business & Management, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 12(1)

Опубликована: Фев. 11, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

The evaluation of negative gossipers: testing the role of group membership and social anxiety DOI Creative Commons
Bruce W. Patton, Hirotaka Imada

Cogent Psychology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 12(1)

Опубликована: Апрель 8, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Ingroup favoritism in cooperation in a dynamic intergroup context: Data from Israeli professional volleyball players DOI Creative Commons
Hirotaka Imada,

Rebecca Kopilovitch,

Ro’i Zultan

и другие.

Judgment and Decision Making, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 20

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Abstract Past research has documented ingroup favoritism, the tendency to cooperate more with members than outgroup members, in a wide range of intergroup contexts, and extensively discussed conditions under which favoritism emerges. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on simplistic context, for instance, where group boundaries are static, one membership is present. To fill gap, we leveraged data from professional volleyball players investigated influence (1) varying levels conflict salience, (2) past present memberships, (3) national team cooperation. Contrary our hypotheses social identity perspective, found that salience former did not Additionally, there ingroup, cooperative those who play leading increased favoritism.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Group-bounded indirect reciprocity and intergroup gossip DOI Creative Commons
Hirotaka Imada, Nobuhiro Mifune,

Hannah Zibell

и другие.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 115, С. 104657 - 104657

Опубликована: Июнь 25, 2024

Gossip, the exchange of information about absent others, is ingrained in system indirect reciprocity, which participating members selectively interact and cooperate with others a good reputation. Previous psychological theorizing suggests that reciprocity perceived to be bounded by group membership. We aimed examine whether group-bounded perspective explains intergroup gossip. thus explored how membership shapes expectations gossip used willingness within across boundaries. conducted three studies (total N = 986) re-analyzed published dataset (N 690) comprehensively investigated willing people expect engage within- between-group as well they themselves are both types gossip, minimal university contexts. found consistent perspective, expected more likely than In addition, context, we were, general, towards in-group rather out-group members. However, were members, respectively, suggesting may utilize for strategic reasons. Our research was first experimentally elucidate role shaping offers promising starting point future work on reciprocity.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Dynamic indirect reciprocity: The influence of personal reputation and group reputation on cooperative behavior in nested social dilemmas DOI
Xiaoming Wang,

Fancong Kong,

Hongjin Zhu

и другие.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 112, С. 104599 - 104599

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Revisiting the bounded generalized reciprocity model: Ingroup favoritism and concerns about negative evaluation DOI
Yutaka Horita,

Shun Hamada

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 113, С. 104618 - 104618

Опубликована: Апрель 15, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Intergroup cooperation in the United States and Japan: Revisiting Yuki's (2003) theory on the cultural difference in the conceptualization of group boundaries DOI Creative Commons
Hirotaka Imada, Gen Tsudaka, Nobuhiro Mifune

и другие.

Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 7, С. 100200 - 100200

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024

Social identity theory posits that individuals perceive the in-group as a homogenous entity comprised of depersonalized individuals, and this has provided foundation to understand intergroup processes for many years. Cross-cultural research suggested social may not apply East Asians, who conceptualize their in-groups differently than those in from Western cultures. Specifically, Yuki colleagues contend Asians networks wherein each individual is connected through personal ties, rather individuals. Furthermore, prior shown are more likely trust out-group members with potential connections, similarly how they actual members. This reflects group boundary perception based on linkages categorical membership. Conversely, cultures tend members, regardless connections. Our preregistered study (N = 332 Japanese 345 American university students) aimed conceptually replicate key findings support Yuki's account expand upon context cooperation. Overall, we failed find evidence network-based category-based cooperation among Americans, respectively. Consequently, our results highlight need further experimental investigation validation colleagues' theoretical framework.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Cooperation and crossed categorization in a minimal group context: testing the bounded generalized reciprocity and social identity accounts DOI Creative Commons
Hirotaka Imada, Atsuki Ito, Tim Hopthrow

и другие.

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 23

Опубликована: Авг. 13, 2024

Individuals display the tendency to cooperate more with in-group members than they do out-group (i.e. favoritism) across diverse contexts. While previous studies have thoroughly investigated favoritism when a single social category is salient, understudied how individuals others multiple categories are simultaneously salient. To bridge this gap, we conducted study examine cooperation under crossed categorization, in which two dichotomous orthogonally crossed. We then examined psychological mechanisms potentially underlying intergroup cooperation, including reputational concern, expected and identification, drawn from theoretical perspectives of bounded generalized reciprocity identity theory. Overall, found that memberships additively increased cooperation. That is, double member (a person memberships) was higher partial one membership membership). also larger memberships). In addition, some evidence partially mediated relationship between

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1