Journal of risk and financial management,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
17(7), С. 308 - 308
Опубликована: Июль 18, 2024
As
global
warming
progresses,
implementing
green
finance
to
redirect
resources
into
sustainable
initiatives
has
emerged
as
a
crucial
strategy
for
governments
develop
financial
systems
that
are
carbon-free,
green,
and
(Jin
et
al
[...]
Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
17(2), С. 434 - 434
Опубликована: Янв. 8, 2025
With
the
strategic
background
of
accelerating
transformation
low-carbon
economy
in
China,
how
to
better
help
new
energy
automobile
industry
realize
green
and
high-quality
development
under
goal
“dual-carbon”
with
strengthening
science
technology
has
become
one
most
important
issues
nowadays,
it
is
great
significance
explore
relationship
between
financial
(fintech)
environmental,
social,
governance
(ESG)
performance
(NEV)
industry.
Using
panel
data
from
NEV
companies
listed
on
Shanghai
Shenzhen
A-share
markets
2011
2022,
this
study
applies
text
mining
techniques
construct
a
fintech
index
analyze
transmission
mechanisms
through
which
influences
ESG
performance.
The
findings
show
that
directly
improves
outcomes
for
companies,
result
remains
robust
across
series
validation
tests.
analysis
reveals
reduces
financing
constraints
enhances
corporate
environmental
information
disclosure,
turn
drives
Furthermore,
impact
particularly
pronounced
state-owned
enterprises,
large-scale
firms,
technologically
advanced
as
evidenced
by
heterogeneity
analysis.
This
provides
empirical
insights
into
fintech’s
role
advancing
sustainable
sector,
offering
guidance
policymakers
stakeholders
aiming
align
technological
progress
social
objectives.
Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
17(5), С. 2296 - 2296
Опубликована: Март 6, 2025
This
study
examines
the
mutual
relationships
among
ESG
performance,
total
factor
productivity
(TFP),
and
energy
efficiency
(EE)
in
a
sample
of
Chinese
A-share
listed
firms
from
2010
to
2022.
shows
that
has
significant
promotional
effect
on
TFP.
Reducing
financing
constraints
inefficient
investment
are
mediating
mechanisms,
latter
plays
greater
role.
Heterogeneity
analyses
suggest
state-owned
enterprises
(SOEs)
heavy-polluting
(HPEs)
should
be
consistently
committed
responsibility
fulfillment.
Formal
environmental
regulation
(FER)
can
complementary
ESG,
but
informal
(IER)
opposite
effect.
TFP
was
instead
suppressed
by
triple
combined
with
these
two.
The
results
threshold
effects
EE
indicate
positive
impact
becomes
more
pronounced
as
performance
improves.
However,
varies
across
subdimensions.
As
green
technology
research
development
(GRDE)
transformation
(GTTE)
improve,
stronger
promotes
EE.
also
exhibits
heterogeneity
respect
ownership
structure.
Moreover,
there
is
bidirectional
causality
between
TFP,
These
findings
reveal
optimal
paths
potential
risks
for
moving
toward
sustainability
firms.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Март 18, 2025
ABSTRACT
Accurate
reporting
on
the
sustainability
of
business
value
propositions
must
be
supported
by
reliable
data
sources
and
sound
methodologies
such
as
life
cycle
assessment
(LCA).
Showing
commitment
to
more
responsible
activity
without
quantifying
impacts,
or
them
only
partially,
could
fall
into
greenwashing
practices.
This
research
aims
analyze
what
extent
thinking
tools
are
widespread
in
global
companies'
reports
determine
whether
companies
practicing
greenwashing.
The
was
done
through
a
review
non‐financial
statements
all
Global
Fortune
500
companies,
with
results
showing
that
they
rarely
refer
LCA.
More
detail,
80%
sample
does
not
quantify
their
environmental
impacts
LCA,
almost
remaining
20%
small
portion
impacts.
Only
two
use
Social
Life
Cycle
Assessment.
Accordingly,
large
still
reluctant
show
actual
emissions,
might
contradict
narratives.
leads
reinforcing
belief
many
making
significant
efforts
engage
strategies
but
increasingly
greenwashing,
products
operations
appear
sustainable
than
are.