Impacts of Soil Health Practices on Hydrologic Processes DOI Open Access
Briana M. Wyatt, Antonio Arenas Amado, Hannah E. Birgé

и другие.

Deleted Journal, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Май 1, 2024

This paper explores the growing interest in soil health, emphasizing its importance optimizing crop production, ecosystem function, and biodiversity. Defined by USDA-NRCS as soil’s capacity to function a vital ecosystem, health involves filtering contaminants, cycling nutrients, supporting infrastructure, regulating water movement. Traditional approaches quantifying focus on chemical, physical, or biological properties, often calling for more integrated measurement method. While practices enhancing such no-tillage, cover crops, biodiversity, have long been promoted, their broader impacts hydrologic cycle are less documented. aims fill this gap reviewing literature practices’ effects providing evidence guidelines policy- decision-makers. It highlights benefits of improved including increased infiltration, higher yields, reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Язык: Английский

Spatial–Temporal Correlation Considering Environmental Factor Fusion for Estimating Gross Primary Productivity in Tibetan Grasslands DOI Creative Commons

Qinmeng Yang,

Ningming Nie,

Yangang Wang

и другие.

Applied Sciences, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 13(10), С. 6290 - 6290

Опубликована: Май 21, 2023

Gross primary productivity (GPP) is an important indicator in research on carbon cycling terrestrial ecosystems. High-accuracy GPP prediction crucial for ecosystem health and climate change assessments. We developed a site-level method based the GeoMAN model, which was able to extract spatiotemporal features fuse external environmental factors predict Tibetan Plateau. evaluated four models’ behavior—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Belief Network (DBN), GeoMAN—in predicting at nine flux observation sites The model achieved best results (R2 = 0.870, RMSE 0.788 g Cm−2 d−1, MAE 0.440 d−1). Distance vegetation type of influenced prediction, with latter being more significant. different grassland types exhibited sensitivity (Ta, PAR, EVI, NDVI, LSWI) prediction. Among them, site located alpine swamp meadow insensitive changes factors; accuracy steppe decreased significantly Kobresia also varied factor changes, but lesser extent than former. This study provides good reference that deep learning achieve simulation when considers spatial, temporal, factors, judgement made by conforms basic knowledge relevant field.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Structure, Functions, and Interactions of Dryland Ecosystems DOI Creative Commons
Xiubo Yu, Yü Liu, Shuli Niu

и другие.

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024

Abstract Understanding the interactions between structures and functions underlying regime shifts in dryland social-ecological systems (SESs) how they respond to climate change is critical for predicting managing future of these ecosystems. Due high spatiotemporal variability sensitivity drylands ecosystem natural anthropogenic disturbances, it challenging predict state SESs. This theme delves into mechanisms geographical heterogeneity resilience maintenance stability SESs that involve threshold behaviors. We emphasized importance considering both biotic abiotic factors identify drive evolution drylands. The research frontier involves understanding ecohydrological socioeconomic processes a geographically diverse scale-dependent context, developing comprehensive indicators, models, multivariable approaches, development effective management strategies can maintain sustainability face ongoing global environmental changes.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Predictive Production Models for Mountain Meadows: A Review DOI Creative Commons

Adrián Jarne,

Asunción Usón,

R. Reiné

и другие.

Agronomy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(4), С. 830 - 830

Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2024

Meadows are the most important source of feed for extensive livestock farming in mountainous conditions, as well providing many environmental services. The actual socioeconomic situation and climate change risk its conservation. That is why finding optimal management important. To do so, predictive models a useful tool to determine impact different practices estimate consequences future scenarios. Empirical good analytical tool, but their applications limited. Dynamic can better newer scenarios, even if there dynamic models, adaptation into grassland production estimation scarce. This article reviews suitable grass mountain meadows when data on agricultural (mowing, grazing, fertilization) forage value available, considering conservation plant biodiversity.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

How do short-term and long-term factors impact the aboveground biomass of grassland in Northern China? DOI Creative Commons
Xiaoyu Zhu, Yi An,

Yifei Qin

и другие.

Carbon Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 3(1)

Опубликована: Июнь 6, 2024

Abstract The aboveground biomass (AGB) of grassland, a crucial indicator productivity, is anticipated to widespread changes in key ecosystem attributes, functions and dynamics. Variations grassland AGB have been extensively documented across various spatial temporal scales. However, precise method disentangle long-term effects from short-term on assess the attribution explanatory factors for change remains elusive. This study aimed quantify impact climatic factors, soil properties, grazing intensity changes, utilizing data spanning 1980s 2000s Northern China. Co-regression model was explored separate AGB, while Generalized Linear Model (GLM) utilized analyze contributions variables AGB. approach effectively avoids issues related regression mean mathematical coupling. results revealed that influence variables, texture could be decomposed into long-term, random effects. Long-term explained 73.6% variation, whereas effect only accounted 5.9% change. Additionally, divided direct indirect effects, with explaining 1.3% 4.6% relative importance assessed, identifying parameters precipitation as main driving area. introduces robust methodology enhance performance distinguishing contributing sustainable development ecology similar regions.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Impacts of Soil Health Practices on Hydrologic Processes DOI Open Access
Briana M. Wyatt, Antonio Arenas Amado, Hannah E. Birgé

и другие.

Deleted Journal, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Май 1, 2024

This paper explores the growing interest in soil health, emphasizing its importance optimizing crop production, ecosystem function, and biodiversity. Defined by USDA-NRCS as soil’s capacity to function a vital ecosystem, health involves filtering contaminants, cycling nutrients, supporting infrastructure, regulating water movement. Traditional approaches quantifying focus on chemical, physical, or biological properties, often calling for more integrated measurement method. While practices enhancing such no-tillage, cover crops, biodiversity, have long been promoted, their broader impacts hydrologic cycle are less documented. aims fill this gap reviewing literature practices’ effects providing evidence guidelines policy- decision-makers. It highlights benefits of improved including increased infiltration, higher yields, reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0