In
the
field
of
climate
change
adaptation,
future
matters.
Amongst
others,
river
futures
justify
way
adaptation
projects
materialize
in
rivers.
this
paper,
we
challenge
ways
which
dominant
paradigms
and
expert
claims
monopolise
truth
concerning
policies
designs
futures,
side-lining
delegitimizing
alternative
futures.
Currently,
limited
work
is
done
to
critically
reflect
on
power
context
adaptation.
We
conceptualized
through
imaginaries:
collectively
performed
publicly
envisioned
reproductions
riverine
socionatures,
mobilized
social
life
order.
Through
Border
Meuse
project
case
study,
a
stretch
south
Netherlands
proclaimed
success
story
Dutch
water
management,
elucidated
how
three
modern
imaginary,
market-driven
imaginary
an
eco-centric
merged
materialized
as
eco-modern
imaginary.
Importantly,
not
only
merged,
also
their
aligned
regimes
merged.
To
end,
argue
that
George
Orwell’s
famous
quote
“Who
controls
past,
future:
who
present,
past”
can
be
extended
‘Who
future,
see
act
rediscover
past’.
Abstract
During
rapid
urban
expansion,
historic
districts
that
are
overtaken
by
the
core
can
experience
divergent
fates.
Some
have
catered
to
tourism
and
commercial
real
estate
undergone
architectural
lifestyle
changes,
thus
resulting
in
loss
of
folk
culture.
Additionally,
as
a
result
funding
shortages
or
property
disputes,
other
appear
decayed
but
regained
attention,
collective
memory
these
is
valued.
This
paper
uses
Shiqiao
Town
Chengdu,
China,
case
study
explore
redevelopment
districts,
with
focus
on
preserving
revitalising
during
expansion.
Via
participant
observations,
semistructured
interviews,
netnography,
natural
language
processing,
policy
content
reviews,
this
investigated
memories
based
everyday
lives
public
perceptions
residents,
aim
facilitating
interactions
between
social
groups,
city.
Unlike
previous
practices
related
creative
destruction,
current
offer
opportunities
for
physical
preservation
representation
memory,
thereby
attaining
mutually
beneficial
outcome
both
economic
development
heritage
conservation.
The
goal
initiative
promote
continuous
reconstruction
forming
framework
focused
‘Original
Memories’,
‘Stable
Linkages’,
‘Continuous
Reconstruction’.
also
highlights
potential
issues
delayed
redevelopment,
such
authenticity,
accuracy
cultural
promotion,
resident
participation,
offering
insights
future
similar
districts.
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Май 27, 2025
Urban
place
offers
potential
to
disrupt
municipal
bureaucratic
cultures—conceptualized
as
organizational
traps
in
public
administration
theory—that
stymie
policy
formulation,
implementation,
and
innovation.
Drawing
on
17
in-depth
interviews
with
actors
survey
responses
from
103
urban
households,
this
paper
three
interventions
the
diffusion
literature.
First,
I
demonstrate
that
leaders
workers
engage
multiple
outside
of
organization,
those
also
interact
amongst
themselves
at
times
magnify
different
ideas
advocacy.
These
activities
occur
realm,
which
overlaps
realm
is
thus
informed
by
features
an
way
life.
Second,
complex
intertwined
involves
lateral
learning
transfer
through
city
a
broadly
defined
set
varying
levels
formal
connection
bureaucracy.
The
occurs
not
only
advancement:
external
learn
about
internal
development
implementation.
Third,
respondents
offered
place-based,
or
“hyper-localized”
methods,
deficits
known
managerialism.
In
the
field
of
climate
change
adaptation,
future
matters.
Amongst
others,
river
futures
justify
way
adaptation
projects
materialize
in
rivers.
this
paper,
we
challenge
ways
which
dominant
paradigms
and
expert
claims
monopolise
truth
concerning
policies
designs
futures,
side-lining
delegitimizing
alternative
futures.
Currently,
limited
work
is
done
to
critically
reflect
on
power
context
adaptation.
We
conceptualized
through
imaginaries:
collectively
performed
publicly
envisioned
reproductions
riverine
socionatures,
mobilized
social
life
order.
Through
Border
Meuse
project
case
study,
a
stretch
south
Netherlands
proclaimed
success
story
Dutch
water
management,
elucidated
how
three
modern
imaginary,
market-driven
imaginary
an
eco-centric
merged
materialized
as
eco-modern
imaginary.
Importantly,
not
only
merged,
also
their
aligned
regimes
merged.
To
end,
argue
that
George
Orwell’s
famous
quote
“Who
controls
past,
future:
who
present,
past”
can
be
extended
‘Who
future,
see
act
rediscover
past’.