The Peace Imperative for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction DOI Creative Commons
Laura E. R. Peters

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 3, 2024

Abstract Disasters disproportionately affect conflict-affected regions, where approximately two billion people reside, posing significant challenges for disaster risk reduction (DRR). This reality has increasingly spurred calls violent conflict to be included in the global DRR agenda. However, consideration of peace been lacking, despite that can distinctly impact capacities set, pursue, and achieve objectives. study investigated how Sendai Framework Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR) engages with through a document analysis, revealing three key findings. First, SFDRR does not mention “peace,” mirroring its lack reference conflict. Second, while peace-related terms appear throughout themes related partnership all-of-society approaches, this engagement is superficial. Third, SFDRR’s approach fundamentally problematic advancing due avoidance complex social political dynamics inherent reduction. The united United Nations Member States ambition “leave no one behind,” but taken approaches smooth over diversity rather than strengthen pluralistic connections. A radical, integrated DRR-peacebuilding agenda must take as new starting point carve pathways toward including diplomacy environmental peacebuilding. By embracing ambiguity between war addressing root causes risk, societies cultivate peaceful interactions collectively advance safety. concludes recommendations policy only implicitly relies on actively contributes peacebuilding world’s diverse divided societies.

Язык: Английский

De-escalation and diplomacy: disasters as drivers of reduced conflict risks in the Indo-Pacific DOI Creative Commons
Tobias Ide,

Ali Hayes,

Indah Larasati

и другие.

Australian Journal Of International Affairs, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 19

Опубликована: Фев. 3, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways DOI Creative Commons
Xiaolan Xie, Mengmeng Hao, F. Ding

и другие.

Environmental Research Communications, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 6(11), С. 112002 - 112002

Опубликована: Окт. 22, 2024

Abstract The potential impacts of climate change on violent conflict are high the agenda scholars and policy makers. This article reviews existing literature to clarify relationship between risk, focusing roles temperature precipitation. While some debate remains, substantial evidence shows that increases risk under specific conditions. We examine four key pathways through which affects conflict: (i) economic shocks, (ii), agricultural decline, (iii) natural resources competition, (iv) migration. Key gaps include limited long-term data, insufficient integrated studies, inadequate understanding causal mechanisms, necessitating transdisciplinary research addresses social vulnerability underlying pathways.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1
The Peace Imperative for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction DOI Creative Commons
Laura E. R. Peters

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 3, 2024

Abstract Disasters disproportionately affect conflict-affected regions, where approximately two billion people reside, posing significant challenges for disaster risk reduction (DRR). This reality has increasingly spurred calls violent conflict to be included in the global DRR agenda. However, consideration of peace been lacking, despite that can distinctly impact capacities set, pursue, and achieve objectives. study investigated how Sendai Framework Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR) engages with through a document analysis, revealing three key findings. First, SFDRR does not mention “peace,” mirroring its lack reference conflict. Second, while peace-related terms appear throughout themes related partnership all-of-society approaches, this engagement is superficial. Third, SFDRR’s approach fundamentally problematic advancing due avoidance complex social political dynamics inherent reduction. The united United Nations Member States ambition “leave no one behind,” but taken approaches smooth over diversity rather than strengthen pluralistic connections. A radical, integrated DRR-peacebuilding agenda must take as new starting point carve pathways toward including diplomacy environmental peacebuilding. By embracing ambiguity between war addressing root causes risk, societies cultivate peaceful interactions collectively advance safety. concludes recommendations policy only implicitly relies on actively contributes peacebuilding world’s diverse divided societies.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1