Gender Differences in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Higher Education: Characteristics and Consequences DOI Creative Commons
Anja Møgelvang, Camilla Bjelland, Simone Grassini

и другие.

Education Sciences, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(12), С. 1363 - 1363

Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024

Student gender differences in technology acceptance and use have persisted for years, giving rise to equity concerns higher education (HE). To explore if such extend generative artificial intelligence (genAI) chatbot use, we surveyed a large Norwegian HE student sample (n = 2692) using fully mixed concurrent equal status design. Our findings show that men exhibit more frequent engagement with genAI chatbots across broader spectrum of applications. Further, demonstrate heightened interest as tools their relevance future career prospects. Women primarily utilize text-related tasks express greater regarding critical independent thinking. also stronger need learn how determine when it is wise trust chatbots. Consequences are discussed the individual, society, institutions terms social reproduction, diversity competence, equitable teaching practices.

Язык: Английский

Improving Annual Plans Developed through Traditional Methods with ChatGPT: The Experiences of Doctoral Students DOI Open Access
Emine Aruğaslan, Hanife Çivril

Sınırsız Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 10(1), С. 56 - 122

Опубликована: Март 15, 2025

The aim of this study is to evaluate the contributions AI tool, ChatGPT, used by doctoral students improve their annual plans, and examine advantages challenges that arise throughout process. research was conducted using a qualitative case approach carried out with 13 students. data were analyzed content analysis, themes obtained from analysis result explained in detail student quotes. identified related ChatGPT's plan improvement, its disadvantages education, barriers usage. Additionally, students' perspectives on ChatGPT examined. findings reveal generally have positive outlook although some expressed cautious critical attitudes, voicing concerns about While offers such as addressing shortcomings, generating new ideas, clarifying learning outcomes, saving time, it also presents disadvantages, including reduction teacher-student interaction, issues objectivity, potential stifling thinking skills. Furthermore, access limitations, language barriers, technical infrastructure found restrict effective use technology.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Assessing Institutional Reputation Beyond Quality Rankings DOI

Marianne Haddad-Adaimi,

Roy Abi Zeid Daou, Yves Ducq

и другие.

Corporate Reputation Review, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 22, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

“ChatGPT 4.0 Ghosted Us While Conducting Literature Search:” Modeling the Chatbot’s Generated Non-Existent References Using Regression Analysis DOI
Dharel P. Acut, Nolasco K. Malabago,

Elesar V Malicoban

и другие.

Internet Reference Services Quarterly, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 26

Опубликована: Ноя. 13, 2024

The integration of AI technologies like ChatGPT has transformed academic research, yet substantial gaps exist in understanding the implications AI-generated non-existent references literature searches. While prior studies have predominantly focused on medical and geography fields using descriptive statistics, a systematic investigation into 4.0's effectiveness generating accurate within realm science technology education remains unexplored, highlighting significant dearth research this critical area. This study, therefore, investigates reliability writing utilizing 4.0. Employing non-experimental correlational design, examines impact prompt specificity citation accuracy across various types prompts, including general, specific, methodological, review, interdisciplinary prompts. findings indicate that prompts correlate positively with references, while general frequently result references. Visualizations, confusion matrix precision-recall curve, illustrate model's performance. Ultimately, study underscores necessity well-structured to enhance reference quality cautions against AI-induced hallucinations produce which can significantly undermine credibility.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Assessing Biases in the Names Generated by Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots DOI Creative Commons
Jaime E. Mirowsky

Journal of Chemical Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 16, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is becoming more prevalent in higher education, and with that comes opportunities challenges. One opportunity using this technology to help create educational material, but one challenge the output of these tools might produce biased content. Thus, for work, three text-based GenAI (ChatGPT-4o, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini) were used develop an activity analytical chemistry laboratory course. In each response, student names provided by chatbots quantified respect gender broadly assessed cultural representation. All generated equal percentage female ("she/her") male ("he/him") names, none "they/them" pronouns, signaling a lack inclusivity nonbinary, gender-neutral, or gender-nonconforming individuals. The dominated those popular English-speaking countries, highlighting diversity provided. Both biases could be mitigated asking provide gender-inclusive represent diverse backgrounds. As educators begin utilize classroom materials have students use their assignments, it important think about potential emerge, share limitation tools, work not perpetuate them.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Gender Differences in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Higher Education: Characteristics and Consequences DOI Creative Commons
Anja Møgelvang, Camilla Bjelland, Simone Grassini

и другие.

Education Sciences, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(12), С. 1363 - 1363

Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024

Student gender differences in technology acceptance and use have persisted for years, giving rise to equity concerns higher education (HE). To explore if such extend generative artificial intelligence (genAI) chatbot use, we surveyed a large Norwegian HE student sample (n = 2692) using fully mixed concurrent equal status design. Our findings show that men exhibit more frequent engagement with genAI chatbots across broader spectrum of applications. Further, demonstrate heightened interest as tools their relevance future career prospects. Women primarily utilize text-related tasks express greater regarding critical independent thinking. also stronger need learn how determine when it is wise trust chatbots. Consequences are discussed the individual, society, institutions terms social reproduction, diversity competence, equitable teaching practices.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0