The potential economic impact of the updated COVID-19 mRNA fall 2023 vaccines in Japan DOI Creative Commons

K Fust,

Kedar Joshi, Ekkehard Beck

и другие.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Год журнала: 2023, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 4, 2023

Abstract This analysis estimates the economic and clinical impact of a Moderna updated COVID-19 mRNA Fall 2023 vaccine for adults ≥18 years in Japan. A previously developed Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model with 1-year analytic time horizon (September 2023-August 2024) consequences decision tree were used to estimate symptomatic infections, COVID-19–related hospitalizations, deaths, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) versus no additional vaccination, Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The is predicted prevent 7.2 million 272,100 hospitalizations 25,600 related deaths In base case (healthcare perspective), ICER was ¥1,300,000/QALY gained ($9,400 USD/QALY gained). Sensitivity analyses suggest results are most affected by incidence, initial effectiveness (VE), VE waning against infection. Assuming relative between both bivalent vaccines apply vaccines, suggests version will an 1,100,000 27,100 2,600 compared expected be highly cost-effective at ¥5 willingness-to-pay threshold across wide range scenarios.

Язык: Английский

Association of SARS-CoV-2 BA.4/BA.5 Omicron lineages with immune escape and clinical outcome DOI Creative Commons
Joseph A. Lewnard, Vennis Hong,

Jeniffer S. Kim

и другие.

Nature Communications, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 14(1)

Опубликована: Март 14, 2023

Abstract Expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron subvariants in populations with prevalent immunity from prior infection vaccination, associated burden severe COVID-19, has raised concerns about epidemiologic characteristics these lineages including their association immune escape or clinical outcomes. Here we show that BA.4/BA.5 cases a large US healthcare system had at least 55% (95% confidence interval: 43–69%) higher adjusted odds documented than time-matched BA.2 cases, as well 15% (9–21%) 38% (27–49%) having received 3 ≥4 COVID-19 vaccine doses, respectively. However, after adjusting for differences among each lineage, was not differential risk emergency department presentation, hospital admission, intensive care unit admission following an initial outpatient diagnosis. This finding held sensitivity analyses correcting potential exposure misclassification resulting unascertained infections. Our results demonstrate reduced severity (BA.1 BA.2) lineages, relative to Delta variant, persisted BA.4/BA.5, despite increased breakthrough previously vaccinated infected individuals.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

31

Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE Framework DOI Creative Commons
S Kavikondala, Katrin Haeussler, Xuan Wang

и другие.

Infectious Diseases and Therapy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(4), С. 779 - 811

Опубликована: Март 18, 2024

The mRNA vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 demonstrated high efficacy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in phase 3 clinical trials, including among older adults. To inform disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine selection, this systematic literature review (SLR) meta-analysis assessed the comparative effectiveness of versus We systematically searched for relevant studies reporting COVID-19 outcomes with adults aged ≥ 50 years by first cross-checking published SLRs. Based on cutoff date from a previous similar SLR, we then WHO Research Database articles between April 9, 2022, June 2, 2023. Outcomes interest were SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic COVID-19–related hospitalization, death following doses. Random effects models used to pool risk ratios (RRs) across studies. Heterogeneity was evaluated using chi-square testing. Evidence certainty per GRADE framework. Twenty-four non-randomized real-world individuals included meta-analysis. Vaccination associated significantly lower (RR 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64‒0.80]), CI 0.62‒0.83]), 0.67 0.57‒0.78]), hospitalization 0.65 0.53‒0.79]) but not 0.80 0.64‒1.00]) compared BNT162b2. There considerable heterogeneity all (I2 > 75%) except = 0%). Multiple subgroup sensitivity analyses excluding specific generally consistent results. Certainty evidence rated as low (type 3) or very 4), reflecting lack randomized controlled trial data. Meta-analysis 24 observational asymptomatic, symptomatic, infections hospitalizations years.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

13

Globally approved vaccines for COVID-19: a systematic review DOI

Bárbara Magalhães,

Jéssica Medeiros Minasi, Rubens Cáurio Lobato

и другие.

Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Янв. 9, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

The Potential Economic Impact of the Updated COVID-19 mRNA Fall 2023 Vaccines in Japan DOI Creative Commons

Kelly Fust,

Keya Joshi, Ekkehard Beck

и другие.

Vaccines, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12(4), С. 434 - 434

Опубликована: Апрель 18, 2024

This analysis estimates the economic and clinical impact of a Moderna updated COVID-19 mRNA Fall 2023 vaccine for adults ≥18 years in Japan. A previously developed Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model with one-year analytic time horizon (September 2023–August 2024) consequences decision tree were used to estimate symptomatic infections, related hospitalizations, deaths, quality-adjusted life (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) versus no additional vaccination, Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine. The is predicted prevent 7.2 million 272,100 hospitalizations 25,600 deaths In base case (healthcare perspective), ICER was ¥1,300,000/QALY gained ($9400 USD/QALY gained). Sensitivity analyses suggest results are most affected by incidence, initial effectiveness (VE), VE waning against infection. Assuming relative between both bivalent vaccines apply vaccines, suggests version will an 1,100,000 27,100 2600 compared expected be highly cost-effective at ¥5 willingness-to-pay threshold across wide range scenarios.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

Early Omicron infection is associated with increased reinfection risk in older adults in long-term care and retirement facilities DOI Creative Commons
Jessica A. Breznik,

Ahmad Rahim,

Ali Zhang

и другие.

EClinicalMedicine, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 63, С. 102148 - 102148

Опубликована: Авг. 21, 2023

Older adults are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection and severe disease, especially those in congregate living settings, despite high vaccine coverage. It is unclear whether hybrid immunity (combined vaccination infection) after one provides protection against subsequent reinfection older adults.Incidence was examined 750 vaccinated residents long-term care retirement homes the observational cohort COVID Long-Term Care Study Ontario, Canada, within a 75-day period (July to September 2022). Risk assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Serum anti-spike anti-RBD IgG IgA antibodies, microneutralization titres, spike-specific T cell memory responses, were subset 318 preceding three months.133 participants (17.7%) had PCR-confirmed during observation period. Increased associated with prior (at 9-29 days: 47.67 [23.73-95.76]), this not attributed days since fourth (1.00 [1.00-1.01]) or residence outbreaks (>6 compared ≤6: 0.95 [0.37-2.41]). Instead, reinfected lower serum neutralizing antibodies ancestral BA.1 SARS-CoV-2, their initial infection.Counterintuitively, homes. Less robust humoral immune responses may contribute reinfection.COVID-19 Immunity Task Force Public Health Agency Canada.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

9

A response to: A letter to the editor in response to: Indirect comparison of the relative vaccine effectiveness of mRNA-1283 vs. BNT162b2 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19 among US adults DOI
Ekkehard Beck,

Mihaela Georgieva,

Nicolas Van de Velde

и другие.

Current Medical Research and Opinion, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 5

Опубликована: Май 15, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Early humoral and cellular responses after bivalent SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA‐1273.214 vaccination in long‐term care and retirement home residents in Ontario, Canada: An observational cohort study DOI Creative Commons
Jessica A. Breznik,

Ahmad Rahim,

Hina Bhakta

и другие.

Journal of Medical Virology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 95(10)

Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2023

Abstract Immunogenicity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) bivalent mRNA‐1273.214 vaccine (Original/Omicron B.1.1.529 [BA.1]) is underreported in vulnerable older adults congregate care settings. In residents 26 long‐term and retirement homes Ontario, Canada, humoral (i.e., serum anti‐spike anti‐receptor binding domain [anti‐RBD]) IgG IgA antibodies live SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralization) cellular CD4 + CD8 activation‐induced marker spike‐specific T cell memory) responses were assessed 7–120 days postvaccination with four monovalent mRNA vaccines ( n = 494) or subsequent vaccination (fifth vaccine) 557). Within 4 months, anti‐RBD antibody levels similar after infection‐naïve individuals. Hybrid immunity natural infection) generally increased responses. After vaccination, compared to hybrid had elevated antibodies. Omicron BA.1 antibody‐mediated neutralization, memory spike protein, also higher vaccination. Humoral were, therefore, noninferior within months Waning but not was particularly evident individuals without immunity. Continued monitoring vaccine‐associated against emerging variants concern necessary assess longevity protection.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5

Clinical and Economic impact of updated Fall 2023 COVID-19 vaccines in the Immunocompromised Population in Canada DOI Creative Commons
Amy S. Lee, Kavisha Jayasundara, Michele Kohli

и другие.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Год журнала: 2023, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 11, 2023

ABSTRACT Background Immunocompromised (IC) individuals are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection-related severe outcomes. Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines available in Canada, differences vaccine effectiveness (VE) have been found between the two IC individuals. The objective this analysis was to compare clinical economic impact a XBB.1.5 updated Fall 2023 Canadian aged ≥18 years. Methods A static decision-analytic model estimated number infections, hospitalizations, deaths, resulting quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over one-year time horizon (September 2023-August 2024) adult population (n=894,580). Costs associated with infection were from health care societal perspectives. predicted VE based on prior variant versions, which well-matched circulating variant. calculated meta-analysis comparative both (relative for vaccine: infection=0.85 [95%CI 0.75-0.97], hospitalization=0.88 0.79-0.97]). combined estimates incidence probability related Sensitivity analyses tested uncertainty surrounding incidence, hospitalization mortality rates, costs, QALYs. Results Given expected higher against hospitalizations vaccine, its use is prevent an additional 2,411 infections (3.6%), 275 (3.7%), 47 deaths (4.0%) compared 330 QALYs gained, savings $7.4M treatment $0.9M productivity loss costs. most sensitive variations parameters, specifically relative vaccines, waning rates. Conclusions If protect similar previous using would result substantial public benefits individuals, as well provide cost savings.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

A Letter to the Editor Regarding ‘Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis Using the GRADE Framework’ DOI Creative Commons
Hannah R. Volkman, Jennifer L. Nguyen, Luis Jódar

и другие.

Infectious Diseases and Therapy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(10), С. 2203 - 2206

Опубликована: Авг. 24, 2024

incorrect estimates that not only greatly exaggerated the numerical differences in VE between two vaccines but also led to conclusions directly contradicted those of original study authors many instances.As a brief example this (see Supplementary Appendix for additional details), wherein one studies concluded "there was no difference BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 recipients [3]" based on their reported adjusted results, Kavikondala et al. instead calculated and used 63% crude relative as point estimate meta-analysis.This mistake-where found these vaccines, yet random effects risk ratios by significantly favored mRNA-1273-occurred 20/54 (37%) all (from 24 included studies) Fig. 3a-e.In addition, there were eligible missed systematic review (i.e., at least 14 extensive errors data extraction.These concerns are described detail Appendix.Second, set out compare BNT162b2, so they should have head-to-head estimates.Comparative better account potential brand-specific population characteristics vaccine (e.g., age or COVID-19 status) timing

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE Framework DOI Open Access
S Kavikondala, Katrin Haeussler, Xuan Wang

и другие.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Год журнала: 2023, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 22, 2023

ABSTRACT Background The mRNA vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 demonstrated high efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection in phase 3 clinical trials, including among older adults. To inform COVID-19 vaccine selection, this systematic literature review (SLR) meta-analysis assessed the comparative effectiveness of versus Methods We systematically searched for relevant studies reporting outcomes with adults aged ≥50 years by first cross-checking published SLRs. Based on cutoff date from a previous similar SLR, we then WHO Research Database articles between April 9, 2022 June 2, 2023. Outcomes interest were infection, symptomatic severe COVID-19‒related hospitalization, death following ≥2 doses. Random-effects models used to pool risk ratios (RRs) across studies. Heterogeneity was evaluated using chi-squared testing. Evidence certainty per GRADE framework. Results 24 non-randomized real-world individuals included meta-analysis. Vaccination associated significantly lower (RR 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64‒0.80]), CI 0.62‒0.83]), 0.67 0.57‒0.78]), hospitalization 0.65 0.53‒0.79]) 0.80 0.64‒0.99]) compared BNT162b2. There considerable heterogeneity all (I 2 >75%) except =0%). Multiple subgroup sensitivity analyses excluding specific generally consistent results. Certainty evidence rated as low (type 3) or very 4), reflecting lack randomized-controlled trial data. Conclusion Meta-analysis observational asymptomatic, symptomatic, infections; hospitalizations; deaths years. SUMMARY POINTS pandemic has disproportionately affected adults, population is more susceptible due immune senescence underlying comorbidities. available settings. homologous primary booster (including infections), than vaccination

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2