Ability of a passive back support exoskeleton to mitigate fatigue related adaptations in a complex repetitive lifting task
Emma J Ratke,
Hannah McMaster,
Chris L. Vellucci
и другие.
Journal of Biomechanics,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 112553 - 112553
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Influence of varied assistance levels provided by a dual-joint active back-support exoskeleton on spinal musculoskeletal loading and kinematics during lifting
Ergonomics,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 13
Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2025
An
active
dual-joint
back-support
exoskeleton
with
motors
at
both
lumbar
and
hip
level
was
designed
to
reduce
spinal
musculoskeletal
loading
preserve
flexibility
during
lifting.
A
subject-specific
controller
estimated
the
moment
actively
generated
by
back
muscles
counteract
gravitational
forces
on
upper
body,
minimising
a
counter-productive
abdominal
muscle
contraction.
Eight
subjects
lifted
15
kg
load
using
free
technique
four
assistance
levels,
i.e.
0%,
30%,
50%,
70%
of
moment.
Time-averaged
L5S1
compressive
force
an
EMG-driven
biomechanical
model,
decreased
5.5–9.3%
14.9–28.6%,
respectively,
non-zero
assistance.
Higher
did
not
yield
larger
compression
reduction
but
gain
further
in
time-averaged
No
significant
changes
activity
minor
flexion
were
observed
suggesting
design
achieved
their
objectives.
Язык: Английский
Assessment of active back-support exoskeleton on carpentry framing tasks: Muscle activity, range of motion, discomfort, and exertion
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
107, С. 103716 - 103716
Опубликована: Март 6, 2025
Язык: Английский
The perceptual and biomechanical effects of scaling back exosuit assistance to changing task demands
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
15(1)
Опубликована: Март 29, 2025
Back
exoskeletons
are
gaining
attention
for
preventing
occupational
back
injuries,
but
they
can
disrupt
movement,
a
burden
that
risks
abandonment.
Enhanced
adaptability
is
proposed
to
mitigate
burdens,
perceptual
benefits
less
known.
This
study
investigates
the
and
biomechanical
impacts
of
SLACK
suit
(non-assistive)
controller
versus
three
controllers
with
varying
adaptability:
Weight-Direction-Angle
adaptive
(WDA-ADPT)
scales
assistance
based
on
weight
boxes
using
chest-mounted
camera
machine
learning
algorithm,
movement
direction,
trunk
flexion
angle,
standard
Direction-Angle
(DA-ADPT)
Angle
(A-ADPT)
controllers.
Fifteen
participants
performed
variable
(2,
8,
14
kg)
box-transfer
task.
WDA-ADPT
achieved
highest
score
(88%)
across
survey
categories
reduced
peak
extensor
(BE)
muscle
amplitudes
by
10.1%.
DA-ADPT
had
slightly
lower
(76%)
BE
reduction
(8.5%).
A-ADPT
induced
hip
restriction,
which
could
explain
lowest
(55%)
despite
providing
largest
reductions
in
activity
(17.3%).
Reduced
scores
DA
were
explained
too
much
or
little
actual
task
demands.
These
findings
underscore
scaling
demands
improves
perception
device's
suitability.
Язык: Английский