The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review DOI Creative Commons
Bernhard Guetz, Sonja Bidmon

Health Policy, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 132, С. 104821 - 104821

Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2023

Increasingly, the credibility of online reviews is drawing critical attention due to lack control mechanisms, constant debate about fake and, last but not least, current developments in field artificial intelligence. For this reason, aim study was examine extent which assessments recorded on physician rating websites (PRWs) are credible, based a comparison other evaluation criteria.Referring PRISMA guidelines, comprehensive literature search conducted across different scientific databases. Data were synthesized by comparing individual statistical outcomes, objectives and conclusions.The chosen strategy led database 36,755 studies 28 ultimately included systematic review. The review yielded mixed results regarding PRWs. While seven publications supported PRWs, six found no correlation between PRWs alternative datasets. 15 reported results.This has shown that ratings seem be credible when relying primarily patients' perception. However, these portals inadequate represent comparative values such as medical quality physicians. health policy makers our show decisions perceptions may well data from all decisions, however, do contain sufficiently useful data.

Язык: Английский

A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research DOI Creative Commons
Shannon M. Smith, Melissa Tate, Keri Freeman

и другие.

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 20

Опубликована: Май 23, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Detecting multi-modal GAI-manipulated tourism review DOI
Jianqiang Li, Weimin Zheng, Xin Guo

и другие.

Tourism Management, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 111, С. 105220 - 105220

Опубликована: Май 26, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Advancing Semantic Classification: A Comprehensive Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Analyzing Russian-Language Patient Reviews DOI Creative Commons
Irina Kalabikhina, Vadim Moshkin, Anton Vasilyevich Kolotusha

и другие.

Mathematics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12(4), С. 566 - 566

Опубликована: Фев. 13, 2024

Currently, direct surveys are used less and to assess satisfaction with the quality of user services. One most effective methods solve this problem is extract attitudes from social media texts using natural language text mining. This approach helps obtain more objective results by increasing representativeness independence sample service consumers being studied. The purpose article improve existing test a method for classifying Russian-language reviews patients about work medical institutions doctors, extracted resources. authors developed hybrid tested machine learning various neural network architectures (GRU, LSTM, CNN) achieve goal. More than 60,000 posted on two popular doctor review sites in Russia were analysed. Main results: (1) classification algorithm highly efficient—the best result was shown GRU-based architecture (val_accuracy = 0.9271); (2) application searching named entities messages after their division made it possible increase efficiency each classifiers based use artificial networks. study has scientific novelty practical significance field demographic research. To classification, future, planned expand semantic object appeal sentiment take into account resulting fragments separately other.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Examine the enablers of generative artificial intelligence adoption in supply chain: a mixed method study DOI

Ashish Jagdish Sharma,

Bhawana Rathore

Journal of Decision System, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 33

Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2024

Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) is a burgeoning subfield of artificial intelligence that focuses on creating new content which poised to revolutionise different industries by 2028. This study aims first identify key enablers for the successful integration Gen-AI into supply chain with help Delphi and AHP techniques. Then, we screened these categories identified seven enabler using method. We computed weights those ranked them basis their Ethical Fair AI Practices Public Trust Societal Impact among most significant. Second, this categorised tweet positive, neutral, negative sentiments sentiment analysis fifteen topics from secondary data. The research concludes actionable strategies practitioners outlines significance ethical trust-related in adoption chain.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review DOI Creative Commons
Bernhard Guetz, Sonja Bidmon

Health Policy, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 132, С. 104821 - 104821

Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2023

Increasingly, the credibility of online reviews is drawing critical attention due to lack control mechanisms, constant debate about fake and, last but not least, current developments in field artificial intelligence. For this reason, aim study was examine extent which assessments recorded on physician rating websites (PRWs) are credible, based a comparison other evaluation criteria.Referring PRISMA guidelines, comprehensive literature search conducted across different scientific databases. Data were synthesized by comparing individual statistical outcomes, objectives and conclusions.The chosen strategy led database 36,755 studies 28 ultimately included systematic review. The review yielded mixed results regarding PRWs. While seven publications supported PRWs, six found no correlation between PRWs alternative datasets. 15 reported results.This has shown that ratings seem be credible when relying primarily patients' perception. However, these portals inadequate represent comparative values such as medical quality physicians. health policy makers our show decisions perceptions may well data from all decisions, however, do contain sufficiently useful data.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4